Responding to Crime Part 3 – Prison Population, Youth Justice, & some Alternatives to Prison Flashcards

1
Q

Canada’s incarceration rate

A

118/100,000 population in 2013–14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Remand custody

A

Holding those who await further court appearances in corrections facilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In Prison population how much do males outnumber females: ratio

A

10:1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Indigenous people comprise ___% of the prison population (_% of the Canadian population).

A

Indigenous people comprise 23.2% of the prison population (4% of the Canadian population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

African Canadians comprise % of the federal prison population (% of the Canadian population).

A

African Canadians comprise 9% of the federal prison population (3% of the Canadian population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

African Canadians males comprise __% of the Ontario provincial prison population (__% of the Ontario population).

A

African Canadians males comprise 22% of the Ontario provincial prison population (5.2% of the Ontario population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Those incarcerated generally

A
  1. lack of formal education
  2. have poor employment histories
  3. suffer from substance abuse, fetal alcohol syndrome, and other mental health problems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Youths:
seen to be in a “state of ____”
not considered to be “criminals”
considered more amenable to ________
required _________.

A

seen to be in a “state of delinquency”
not considered to be “criminals”
considered more amenable to reform
required specific treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What court system established for juveniles?

A

separate court systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Youth Criminal Justice Act (ycja), 2003

A

12–17 year olds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Extra-judicial measures

A

Youth are diverted away from the criminal justice system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Police can give (3) to youth

A
  • warning
  • charge them
  • invoke an extra-judicial measure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(YCJA) has ____ the rates in the use of court and custody without increasing recorded youth crime.

A

reduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conditional sentences is ____ sentencing

A

intermediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When was Conditional sentences introduced

A

1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Goal of Conditional sentences

A

reduce prison populations

17
Q

Example of conditions in conditional sentencing

A
  1. Drug/ Alcohol treatment programs
  2. Curfew
  3. House Arrest
  4. Electronic monitering
18
Q

General principals behind Conditional sentences

A
  1. Denunciation
  2. Individual deterrence
  3. Rehabilitation
19
Q

Alternatives to Incarceration

A

Boot camp: inmates are treated like army cadets.

20
Q

Project Turnaround 1997-2004

A

Project Turnaround was a private youth detention centre for male young offenders between 16 and 18 years of age that operated from 1997 to 2004 in Hillsdale, Ontario, Canada. The facility held up to 32 high-risk youths at a time who were serving sentences for crimes such as assault, robbery, forcible confinement, escape, and weapons charges.[3] Youth serving sentences for crimes such as murder, arson, and sexual assault were not eligible for admission to Project Turnaround. The program had an annual budget of $2.3 million.

21
Q

recidivism

A

the tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend.

22
Q

Research by Doob and Cesaroni (2004)—reported ________ recidivism differences between boot camp participants and comparison group.

A

no significant