research methods Flashcards
what is a correlation
shows a link/relationship between variables, known as co-variable 1 and co-variable 2 and there is no manipulation from the researcher
quasi experiment
positives and negatives
the experiment is based on an IV that already exists between ppts that the researcher has not maniupulated
+ can be in lab/field so use those
- sample bias
correlation coefficient
a number from a statistic test that tells us how strong/weak the corrolation is. they range from +1 to -1 and the closer to 0 the weaker they are
correlation types
strong
weak
positive
zero
negative
sampling methods
random
systematic
stratified
volunteer
opportunity
overt observation
ppts know the observation is being conducted
+ more ethically appropriate
- prone to demand charecteristics
feild experiment
takes place in a natural environment where the researcher maniuplates the IV to see the effect on the DV
+ less prone to demand charecteritics
+ high ecological validity
- ethical issues
- lacks reliablility
behaviour sampling in observations
time
event
experimental methods
lab
field
natural
quasi
naturalistic observation
positives and negatives
natural behaviour in a natural environment where the ppts would usually be and there is no manipulation of variables
+ less prone to demand charecteristics
+ high ecological validity
- ethical issues
- lack of reliability
types of observation
covert
overt
controlled
naturalistic
participant
non-participant
opportunity sample
being there at that moment in time and using the people you find
+ very quick, easy and cheap
- not representative
event sampling
the observer decides on specific events relevant to the investigation, and records every time they happen within a set time period
random sampling
create a list of target population in alphabetical order
put each person on that list on equal sized pieces of paper
put all the paper into a hat
pick out the required number of ppts for condition 1 and codition 2
+ unbaised
- time consuming
controlled observation
the conditions are manipulated by the researcher
+ high in reliability
- lacks ecological validity
- more prone to demand charecterstics
time sampling
the observer tallies specific behaviour at set time intervals and ignores any other behaviour that occurs
systematic sampling
create a sampling frame to organise the targer population into, like alphabetically order all ppts and pick the nth person
+ avoids researcher bias
- may not be representative
stratified sampling
the sample reflects real life proportions of groups in the target population
+ most representative
- most time consuming
natural experiment
the resaercher takes advantage of a natually occuring IV
+ allows for new areas of research that wouldn’t have been experimented due to ethical/practical reasons
+ high ecological validity
- may rarely happen which limits research
- no control over EVs
participant observation
the researcher is involved with the group
+ can gain deep understanding
- increased chance of researcher bias
matched pairs
positives and negatives
ppts are matched together based on a charecteristic
+ no order effects
+ reduces individual differences
- time consuming
- individual differences cannot be fully eliminated
non-participant observation
researcher does not get involved with the group
+ reduced chance of researcher bias
- less likely to gain in-depth understanding