Research methods Flashcards
4 experimental methods and explain
Lab - takes place in a specific environment, whereby different variables can be carefully controlled
Field - more natural environment, not in a lab but with variable still being well controlled
Natural - the IV it’s not brought about by the researcher, hence would’ve happened even if the researcher had not been there
Quasi - the IV has not been determined by the researcher, instead, it naturally exists eg: gender and age. No rando, allocation can occur
The for non-experimental methods
Self report (questionnaires and interviews)
Observations
Case studies
Correlational studies
Aim define
General statement made by researcher
Tells us what they plan on investigating
The purpose of their study
Aim is developed from theories and develop from reading about other similar research
Hypothesis define
Precise, testable statement of what the researchers predict will be the outcome of the study which clearly states the relationship between the variables being investigated (IV and DV)
What does the experimental method concern
The manipulation (changing) of the IV to have an effect on the DV which is measured and stated in results
Types of hypothesis and types of experimental/alternative hypothesis and what they are
Null hypothesis - predicts no differnce or relationship between the 2 conditions
Alternative hypothesis / experimental hypothesis: predicts a differnce or a relationship between groups/conditions
Non directional (two tailed) - Predicts a difference or a relationship between groups/conditions but does not state the direction of the difference/relationship
Directional (one tailed) - Predicts a difference or a relationship between conditions and states the direction of the difference/relationship. Used when there’s already pre-existing similar research
Independent and dependant variables
IV - been manipulated (changed) by the researcher or simply changes naturally to have an effect on the DV
To test the effect of IV we need different conditions: the experimental and control condition
DV - measured by the researcher and has been caused by a change to the IV
All other variables affecting the DV should be controlled (extraneous variables) so the researcher can conclude that the effect on the DV was caused by just the IV
Operationalisation of variables define
Variables should be defined and measured
make the hypothesis testable and measurable
Control of variables
Extraneous and confounding variables define
Extraneous- any other variable (which is not the IV) that affects the DV and does not very systematically with the IV. aka nuisance variables
EV could affect the results (DV) but a confounding variable has affected the results (DV)
Eg: age and gender of p’s and lighting of lab
Confounding - a variable other than the IV which has an affect on the DV but also does change systematically with the impact of the DV as the confounding variable could have been the cause
Confounding variable is a type of EV that hasn’t been controlled
Control of variables
Demand characteristics and investigator effects
Demand characteristics - any cue the researcher or the research situation may give which makes the participant guess the aim of the investigation and change their behaviour due to participant reactivity and affect the validity of the results
Please you effect - act in a way they think the researcher wants them to
Screw you effect -intentionally and performed to sabotage the studies results
Participant reactivity can lead to investigator effects
Investigator effects:any unwanted influence from the researchers behaviour (conscious or unconscious) on the DV measured (the results) for example facial expressions or over explaining the task to the participants
Includes a variety of factors, such as the design of the study, the selection of participants and the interaction with each participant during the research investigation
Control of variables
Randomisation and standardisation
A way to minimise the effects of extraneous or confounding variables
Randomisation is the use of chance to reduce the effects of bias from investigator effects
Standardisation: using the exact same formalised procedures and instructions for every single participant involved in the research process
This allows there to eliminate nonstandardised instructions as being possible extraneous variables
Strengths and weaknesses of the labatory experiment
-High control over extraneous variables
Experiments is controlled all the variables and Iv has been precisely replicated between conditions so has high internal validity
-Replication - researchers can repeat experiments and check reliability of results due to standardisation
-Experimenters bias
-Low ecological validity - high degree of control and environment makes the situation artificial so has low mundane realism
-ppts know they’re being tested so increases demand charectaristics so lowers internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of field experiments
-Naturalistic environment - natural behaviours therefore high ecological validity whilst still having a Controlled IV
-ppts COMT know they’re in an experiment so reduces demand charectarisitcs
- Ethical considerations - invasion of privacy and no informed consent
-Loss of control over extraneous variables so precise replication Isnt possible and harder to establish cause and effect so lower internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of a quasi experiment
Controlled conditions - replicable so can check for reliable results and have a high internal validity
Cannot randomly allocate participants to conditions- so there may be participant confounding variables, lowers internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of natural experiment
-Provides opportunities: for research that might not otherwise be undertaken for practical or ethical reasons. They offer unique insights.
-High ecological validity as you’re dealing with real life situations
-diffcuilt to establish causality due to lack of controls over variables
-ppts may not be randomly allocated to conditions so increases participant confounding variables so lowers internal validity
Define sampling
The researchers need to decide how they select participants to take part in the investigation
The population is a group of people from whom This sample is drawn.
Define and describe the 5 sampling methods
Opportunity sampling:
Participants happen to be available at the time which the study is carried out so recruited conveniently
Random sampling
Target population has Equal chances of being the one that is selected for the sample
Each member population is assigned a number, then either a random number table or A random number generator or the lottery method is used to randomly choose a partner
Systematic sampling
Participants are chosen from a list of the target population.
Every Nth participant is chosen to form the sample
Stratified sampling
By selecting from within strata, The characteristics of participants within the sample are in the same proportion as found within the target population.
You identify strat then calculate the required proportion needed for each stratum based on target population. Then select sample at random from each stratum using a random selection method
Volunteer sampling
Involve self selection where ppt offers to take part in response to an advert or when asked to
What must studies be in order to trust the results
Reliable and valid
Why is reliable studies important
Methodology – design measure and procedures
Effects – the patterns of results
Reliable methodologies – produced the same/similar results every time they’re used with a particular sample of individuals
Reliable effects – replicated across a number of different studies and individuals
Measures of external reliability:
Test-retest – measures test consistency and reliability over time
Same test on the same person on differnt occasions.
If results achieve a correlation co-efficient of 0.8 or above then we assume it’s reliable
Inter rater / observer – degree of agreement among raters to reduce bias,if there’s a high positive correlation (0.8+) between the observers/raters the measure is reliable
If you have a correlation of 1 it’s 100% prediction of A and B
4 ways of improving reliability
observations – improve training given to raters to increase accuracy, use pilot studies to identify procedural weaknesses
- interviews – structured interviews are more reliable than unstructured
-questionnaires – use closed rather than open questions
-experiments – use standardised procedures use established tests rather than new ones
Validity define
the extent to which something is measuring what it is claiming to measure
Internal validity define and how it’s measured
Internal: extent to which a study establishes a cause and effect relationship between IV and DV
split half method: split test into 2 parts, participants complete both parts, test the strength of correlation,
Correlations shown on a scatter graph
Large positive correction – high + strong correlation
Small negative correlation
Types of extraneous variables
Participant variables – differences between participants
Situational variables – features of the experimental situation
Other EV’s - eg: researcher bias, demand charectaristics (please you or screw you) and order effect (practise or fatigue
External validity define
generalisability – the extent the results can be generalised to other settings like real life
3 Types of external validity
- Ecological (setting) -> whether results is generalisable to the real world, lack mundane realism (task is not realistic of everyday behaviour)
- Populational (people) -> describes how well the sample used can be generalised to the population as a whole
- Temporal (time) -> whether the findings are still valid today. It’s high when research findings successfully apply across time
Types of test validity
Construct – assessment to see the degree to which a test measures what it claims to
Concurrent – whether a measure is in agreement with a pre-existing measure that’s validated to test for the same concept – if your measure agrees with other measures
Predictive – degree to which a test accurately predicts a criterion that’ll occur in the future
Face (logical) – a superficial and subjective assessment of whether your study or test looks like it’s measures what it claims to
Types of demand characteristics
- please-U —> acts the way the researchers wants them to
- screw-U —> intentionally underperform to sabotage the study’s results
These effect validity
What is a pilot study
A small scale version of an investigation which is done belfre the real investigation
Allows researcher to identify problems and procedure to be changed to deal with these.
Allowing money and time to be saved in the long run
Checks the clarity of the study
2 types of procedures
Single-blind procedure: a research method where the researchers don’t tell the participants if they’re being given a test or control treatment. Ensures less bias in the results and avoids demand charectaristics
Double-blind procedures: neither p’s nor the experiment knows who is receiving a particular treatment. Prevents bias in research results due to demand characteristics or the placebo effect. Reduces investigator effects so can’t give unconscious
Neither participants nor the experiment
Control group / condition define
Set a baseline whereby results from the experimental condition can be compared to results from this one.
If there’s a great change in the experimental group compared to control then they can conclude the cause of effect was the IV
Who researched temporal validity
Perrin and Spencer
Types of observational techniques
Naturalistic - observing behaviour in the setting it would usually take place
Controlled - in a structured environment eg: lab
Overt - p’s know they’re being watched
Covert - p’s are unaware they’re being watched and recorded
Participant - observer is part of the observed group
Non-participant -observer does it from a distance
Naturalistic and controlled observational techniques
Strengths and weaknesses
Naturalistic:
Strengths
-high external validity bc it’s in a natural environment
Limitations
-had to replicate
-EV’s are high bc it’s in a natural environment
Controlled:
Strengths
-more control over EV
-easy to replicate
Limits
-unnatural behaviour
-low mundane realism so low ecological validity
-demand charectaristics
Overt and covert observational techniques
Strengths and weaknesses
Overt:
Strengths
-ethically acceptable bc informed consent is given
Limits
-more likely unnatural participant behaviour as they know they’re being watched
Demand characteristics - reduces validity
Covert:
Strengths
-natural behaviour recorded - high internal validity
-removes participant reactivity
Limits
-Ethical issues presented (no informed consent given)
Participant reactivity define
Differnce between it and demand charectaristics
Participants try to make sense of the situation they’re in which makes them more likely to guess the aim of the study
Demand charectaristics are cues made not by the participant but by the researcher / research process
Participant and nonparticipant observational techniques
Strengths and weaknesses
Participant
Strength
-more insightful - increases validity of findings
Limits:
-researcher may lose objectivity as they may identify too strongly with the participants
Nonparticipant
Strength:
-researcher can be more objective
Limit:
-observer bias eg: stereotypes
-researcher may lose some valuable insight
What’s a problem with Observerational designs and it’s solution
Observer bias
When an observers reports are biased by what they expect to see
Solution: inter observer reliability
Having 2+ observers to compare reports and calculate a score with:
Total number of agreements / total number of observations X100
If there’s a correlation higher than 0.8 / 80% then their results are reliable
Types of obervational designs
Unstructured - continuous recordings where researcher writes everything they see during the observation
Structured - researcher qualifies what they are observing with a predetermined list of behaviours and sampling methods
Observational designs (structured and unstructured) strengths and weaknesses
Unstructured:
+richer and more detailed observations recorded
- produces qualitative data which is more difficult to record and analyse
-greater risk of observer bias
Structured:
+easier, more systemic
-quantitive data is collected, easier to record and analyse and compare
-less risk of observer bias
- less depth of richness of infomation, may miss out on valuable info
What can be used whilst conducting observations
Behavioural categories
When a target behaviour which is being observed is broken up into more precise components which are observable and measureable and operationalised
Eg: anger - shouting, punching, swearing
It’s important that the behaviours don’t overlap with other behaviours when forming berhavioural category list. Operationalised
Sampling methods used during structured interviews
Time sampling - recording behaviour within a pre-established timeframe before the observational study
+ reduces no. of observations to be made so less time consuming
-can be unrepresentative of the observation as a whole
Event sampling
Counting of the number of times a particular behaviour is carried out
+ good for infrequent behaviours, less likely to miss behaviours
-important details of behaviour may be overlooked by observer
- hard to judge beginning and ending of a behaviour
The 3 Experimental design methods
Independent groups design - p’s only participant in one condition of the IV
Repeated measures - same p’s take part in all conditions
Matched pairs - pairs of p’s are matched on a confounding variable (one that affects the DV) then one member of each pair does one condition and the other does the other
Strengths weaknesses and solutions to independent groups design
+ No order effects
+ Minimises demand characteristics
-No control over participant variables, between conditions
-need more participants than other designs, so can be more time consuming and expensive
Random allocation solves participant variables. It insures that each participant has the same chance of being in one condition as another, unbias
Strength, limitations and solutions of repeated measures
+Eliminate participant variables
+ fewer participants needed so not as time-consuming
-Order effects presented, e.g. boredom tiredness
So participants may not do as well in the second task/condition
Counterbalancing half of the participants to conditions in one order and the other half do it in an opposite order
Strengths and limitations of matched pairs
+ no order effects
+ minimises demand characteristics
-Time-consuming, and expensive to match participants
-Large pool of potential participants is needed
Difficult to know which variables are appropriate to match p’s
Define mundane realism
Degree to which experimental study, resembles real life situations and experiences
No mundane realism = lacks external validity
Introduced in 1968 by Aronson and Carlsmith
Define demand characteristics
Hints/cues made by the researcher or research method, which made it participants to guess the research is hypothesis or aim, and therefore potentially influencing their behaviour
What type of bias is it called if only males are studied?
Androcentric bias
Eg: Asch line judgement experiment
What type of bias is it called if only females are studied?
Gynocentric bias
What type of bias is it called if only one country is studied?
Ethnocentric / cultural bias
Results can’t be a reliable and valid representative of all the countries
What did bond and Smith propose in 1996?
Collectivist and independent countries
Collectivist - families in these countries are family orientated - conformity rate is higher
Independent - members of the family in these countries are more orientated on themselves and their careers
Relationship between variables with correlation
Positive correlation – as one variable increases so does the other
Negative – as one variable increases the other variable decreases
Strong correlation – closest to line of best fit, more likely to predict other results
Weak – less accurate prediction
Difference between sample and population
Sample - a small group of people who represent the target population and take part in the study
Population - the group of people who the sample of drawn from not all of them take part in the study
Define sampling frame
A complete list of all the members of the target population
Implications of bias and generalisation in sampling
WEIRD
W – western
E – educated
I – industrialised
R – rich
D – democratic
Define a case study
In-depth study of a particular individual or small group or event, usually yielding a large amount of information. Done Over time. Carried out in real world. Idiographic
Gives us insight on or opposes a whole psychological theory
How are case studies used in clinical psychology?
Clinical: Brain damage can cause a change in behaviour
What case study changed theory of critical periods and language development?
Genie Wille
Strengths and weaknesses of case studies
longitudinal-> patient / individual / group can be followed over an extended period of time
-> high level of validity as they go into depth and give a rich insight
- allow multiple methods to be used (triangulation) = increasing validity
- allows researchers to study events or complex psychological areas they could not practically or ethically manipulate
-efficient because it only takes 1 case study to refute (reject) a theory
- enables study of unusual behaviour found in rare cases
researcher bias: researchers become too involved and lose their objectivity – misinterpreting or inflicting outcomes
- lack of controls due to lots of confounding variables that can effect DV
-lack scientific rigour as they’re unique they can be difficult to replicate
Define observations
A non experimental method the researcher watches and records spontaneous / natural behaviour of participants whiteout manipulating levels of Iv
Define participant reactivity
Hawthorne effect
Behaviour changes of the participant USA,y due to demand charectaristics or investigator effects
Define controlled observation
Type of obersvatiom where p’s are observed ina lab
Increases control and reliability but decreases ecological validity
Define correlation
Mathematical technique used to measure the Extent to which 2 covariables are assossiated with eachother
Define covert observation
Type of observation where observer is hidden so p’s don’t know they’re being observed
Reduces demand characteristics but raises ethical issues around consent
Define experiment
Investigation where a hypothesis is tested by manipulating the IV in order to see its effects on the DV
Define interviews
Self report technique where p’s are asked questions by an interviewer which allows for flexibility in the info gathered
Define observation
Type of data collection where p’s behaviour is observed/watched
Define questionnaires
A self report technique where p’s answer pre-decided questions, in form of paper or electronically. Allows for anonymity
Scientific processes:
Define abstract
A part of a scientific report that aims to summarise the report