Pape 1 Topic 3: Attachment Flashcards
Define attachment
an emotional bond between two people. A two-way process developed over time. It leads to certain behaviours e.g clinging and proximity seeking, and serves the function of protecting an infant
Especially between infant and caregiver
Define caregiver
Any person who is providing care for a child such as a parent.
Define interactional synchrony
When two people interact they tend to mirror eachother such as their facial and body movements, and imitating emotions and behaviours in the same or similar pattern
Infant mirrors and imitates the actions or emotions of another person. The infant moves their body or carry’s out the same act as their caregiver simultaneously and so they’re in sync. This interaction serves to sustain communication between two individuals
Define reciprocity
When a person (baby) responds to the action of another (care giver) with a similar action in the form of taking turns.
Who researched reciprocity in relate to caregivers and infants and how
Brazelton(1979) deserves this interaction as a ‘dance’ as couples response to eachother movements and rhythm. Interaction flows back and forth.
Feldman suggested from 3 months old, reciprocity increases in frequency as the infant and caregiver pays an increasing amount of attention to each others verbal and facial communications. This sensitive responsiveness lays the strong foundations for attachment to develop
Why is attachment important for the caregiver - infant interaction
Human babies are altricial
Meaning they’re born at a relatively early stage of development compared to other animals
Infants must form bonds with adults who will protect and nurture them
Describe key study: Meltzoff and Moore
Aim: examine interactional synchrony in infants
Method:
-controlled observation
- adult displayed 1/3 facial expressions or hand gesture
-child had dummy to prevent facial response
-dummy was removed and Childs expressions were filmed
Results: assossiation between infants behaviour and adult model. They repeated experiment with 3 day olds and results were replicable and reliable.
Conclusion:
Findings suggest interactional synchrony is innate and supports theory that imitative behaviour is learnt
Strengths of Carer-infant interactions - Meltzoff and Moores research
A strength of the research in this area is that it is usually highly controlled and therefore has good validity.
Observations of mother-infant interactions are generally well-controlled procedures, with both mother and infant being filmed, often from multiple angles. This ensures that very fine details of behavior can be recorded and later analysed.
Furthermore, babies don’t know or care that they are being observed so their behavior does not change in response to controlled observation which is generally a problem for observational research.
Therefore, it could be argued that the research in this field has good internal validity.
Limitation of caregiver-infant interactions
A limitation of Meltzoff and Moore’s research is that recent research has suggested there are individual differences involved in interactional synchrony.
Isabella et al. (1989) found that the more securely attached the infant, the greater the level of interactional synchrony.
This suggests that not all children engage in interactional synchrony the same way and that Meltzoff and Moore’s original findings may have overlooked this mediating factor.
Therefore, maybe researchers cannot take a nomothetic approach to studying caregiver-infant interactions.
A limitation of Meltzoff and Moore is that the results may lack reliability due to the methodological problems with studying interactional synchrony using observational methods.
Recent research by Koepke et al. (1983) failed to replicate the findings of Meltzoff and Moore. There is the possibility of observer bias where the researchers consciously or unconsciously interpret behaviour to support their findings.
To address this problem more than one observer should be used to examine the inter-observer reliability of the observations.
This lack of research support suggests that the results of Meltzoff and Moore are unreliable and more research is required to validate their findings
State the Stages of attachment
Asocial
Indiscriminate attachments
Discriminate (specific) attachments
Multiple attachments
Explain the first stage of the stages of attachment
Asocial:
-reciprocity and interactional synchrony play a role in establishing the infants relationship with others
-from 0-2 months
-shows similar responses to objects and people
-towards end of the this stage they do display a preference for faces/eyes
Beginning to show preference for social stimuli vs inanimale objects.
Explain the second stage of the stages of attachment
Indiscriminate attachments:
-from 2 to 6 months
-prefers company of human other objects.
-but are comforted indiscriminately by anyone and shows little to no stranger anxiety yet
Explain the third stage of attachment
Discriminate (specific) attachments
From 7-12 months
Infant shows a preference for one caregiver, displaying seperation and stranger anxiety.
Infant looks to primary caregiver giver for protection and security
In 65% this was the mother, a further 27% had joint attachment to mother and father.
Explain the fourth stage of attachment
One year onwards.
Attachment behaviours shown to multiple people in secondary attachments like siblings and grandparents.
Typically form in the first month after primary attachment is formed and number of multiple attachment which develops on the social circle to whom the infant is exposed.
Within 1 month 29% of infants had at least one other attachment, within 6 months this rose to 78%. Depends on how many consistent relationships there are.
Describe the key study: Schaffer and Emerson
Aim: examine formation of early attachments
Method:
Sample: 60 babies from working class families in Glasgow. Aged between 5-23 weeks.
Observed every 4 weeks until 1 year old
• Observed again at 18 months
• At each visit mother reported infant’s separation protest in seven everyday situations (e.g. being left alone in a room, being left with other people).
• Mother rated intensity of protest on a 4-point scale and identified to whom the protest was directed.
• Stranger anxiety measured by assessing infant’s response to the interviewer at each visit
Findings: Within one month of first becoming attached 29% of infants had multiple attachments
• Within 6 months this had risen to 78% of infants having multiple attachments
• Most infants maintained one principle object of attachment
• The primary object of attachment was not always the one who fed and bathed the infant as 39% of infants attached to someone else
Conclusion:
Responsiveness appeared to be the key to attachment
• Intensely attached infants had mothers who responded quickly to their demands
and, interacted with their child
• Infants who were weakly attached had mothers who failed to interact
Schaffer and Emerson reported that there was little relationship between the time spent together and attachment
Infants can create multiple attachments once a primary attachment has been established
Evaluation of Schaffer and Emerson research of stages of attachment
Strength:
A strength of the study is that is has useful practical applications.
For example, if a baby is in a child care setting in the early stages (asocial and indiscriminate attachments) babies can be comforted by any skilled adult.
However, if a child starts day care later such as in the specific stages of attachment they would benefit from a key worker as they may get distresses with an unfamiliar adult.
Therefore the findings have practical value in the real world and can help with childcare decisions for parents and day care settings so increases validity
A criticism of Schaffer’s research is that it lacks population validity due to the limited sample in the research.
The sample consisted of only 60 working class mothers and babies from Glasgow, who may form very different attachments with their infants when compared with wealthier families from other countries.
For example, there may be specific issues associated with social deprivation e.g. poverty and mental health that may mean the results are not generalisable to other populations.
Therefore, we are unable to generalise the results of this study to mothers and babies from other social backgrounds or other regions as their behaviour might not be comparable. So low populational validity
A limitation of Schaffer & Emerson is that the results may have been affected by social desirability bias.
For example, Shaffer and Emerson interviewed the mothers about their children and some of them may not have reported accurate details about their children in order to appear like ‘better’ mothers with secure attachments.
This could cause a bias in the data that would reduce the validity of the findings since natural behaviour will not have been recorded about the stages of attachment.
However, there are always methodological issues with collecting data on infants as researchers are limited to observations and self-reports
Define multiple attachments
attachments to two or more people. Research has shown that most babies are able to form multiple attachments once they have formed a specific attachment to their main caregiver.
What’s the role of the father in attachemnt
Traditionally, the role of the father in attachment would have been limited, as they would go to work to provide resources for the family whilst the mothers took care of the children. Although recently the role of the father has changed significantly.
How can we use Schaffer and Emerson to talk about the role of the father in multiple attachments?
Schaffer and Emerson has taught us that a baby can have multiple attachments which could include the father.
-they found that the father is rarely the primary attachment figure (only in 3% of cases)
- 75% of babies in S&E had formed an attachment with their father by 18 months (noted by separation anxiety when he left)
Babies are attached to the adult that is most responsive to their needs (this does not need to be the mother).
What are the biological and social differences
-hormonal differences: men lack emotional sensitivity as testosterone promotes aggression. Female hormones estrogem and oxytocin promote caring and empathy behaviour so may mean men are not psychologically equipped to form an intense attachment
Mammals have evolved for women to take this role.
Cultural expectations: affect male behaviour, such as it being thought of as “feminine” to be sensitive towards the needs of others.
Social stereotypes: early and wood argued gender role division is social and not biological
Most men may be constrained to labelsm
What’s the distinct role of the father
Research suggests father take on different role to mothers and act
more a s a play mate
• Fathers are more physically active, playful and provide more challenging situations which help develop problem solving skills
• The mother is more likely to be more conventional in their activities e.g. read a book together
Strengths of the role of the father
-able to form secure attachments with their children if they’re in an intimate marriage
-research evidence that provides support of the role of the father as a ‘playmate’
P: Research suggests that fathers are able to form secure attachments with their
children if they are in an intimate or close marriage.
E - Belsky et al. (2009) found that males who reported higher levels of marital intimacy also displayed a secure father–infant attachment, whereas males with lower levels of marital intimacy displayed insecure father–infant attachments.
E - males can form secure attachments with their children; but strength of the attachment depends on the father and mother relationship.
L - Therefore, while fathers may be biologically determined to form a different relationship with their children, this relationship is mediated by their environment (the intimacy of their marriage) suggesting that while a father’s role may be determined, it is only determined to an extent and therefore a softer view of determinism is more appropriate.
P - There is research evidence that provides support for the role of the father as a ‘playmate’.
E - Research by Geiger (1996) found that fathers’ play interactions were more exciting in comparison to mothers’. However, the mothers’ play interactions were more affectionate and nurturing.
E - This suggests that the role of the father is as a playmate and not as a sensitive parent who responds to the needs of their children.
L - These results also confirm that the mother takes on more of a nurturing role and shows there may be biological explanations between the genders of the role they take with their children.
Limitation of the role of the father
P - Evidence suggests that fathers don’t provide a sensitive and nurturing attachment.
E - Hrdy (1999) found that fathers were less able to detect low levels of infant distress, in comparison to mothers. These results appear to support the biological explanations; the lack of oestrogen in men means that fathers are not biologically equipped to form close attachments with their children.
E - This suggests that the role of the father is, to some extent, biologically determined and that a father’s role is restricted because of their biological makeup.
L - This provides further evidence that fathers are not able to provide a sensitive and nurturing type of attachment, as they are unable to detect stress in their children and are therefore less likely to the primary caregiver.
Some researchers believe that caregiver-infant interactions influence the development of attachemnt
Explain one reason why it is difficult to draw conclusions about the role of caregiver-infant interactions in the development of attachment.
cannot ever show cause and effect because it is ethically impossible to manipulate the amount / quality of caregiver-infant interaction;
Define ethology
Studying animals in their natural environment
Define animal experiment
Studying animals in a controlled setting with an IV
What’s the link between rhesus and humans genes
Rhesus monkeys share 93% of their genes with humans and are seen to experience the most ‘human like’ emotion amongst animals
Which zoologist studied imprinting
Lorenz
one of the founders of modern ethology
Describe Lorenz procedure study into imprinting
Procedure:
-split a large clutch of greylag goose eggs into two batches. One batch hatched naturally with the mother, the other batch hatched in an incubator with Lorenz making sure that he was the first moving object the goslings encountered.
•He placed all the goslings under and upturned box. The box was then removed and the gosling’s behaviour was recorded.
Describe Lorenz findings study into imprinting
After birth, the naturally hatched baby goslings followed their mother about whilst the incubator hatched goslings followed Lorenz around.
•When released from the upturned box, the naturally hatched goslings went straight to their mother whereas the incubator hatched goslings went straight to Lorenz (showing no bond to their natural mother).
•Lorenz noticed how the process of imprinting occurred only a short period of time after birth (between 4 and 25 hours – critical period)
Describe Lorenz conclusion into imprinting
found that certain animals had an innate tendency to respond immediately to specific forms of stimuli.
•Imprinting is a form of attachment whereby close contact is kept with the first large moving object encountered.
•These bonds proved to be irreversible (the naturally hatched goslings would only follow their mother; the incubator hatched goslings would only follow Lorenz).
Who inspired Bowley and what did Bowley argue
Lorenz
Bowlby argued there is an ‘innate pre-programming’ to stay close to primary care givers. Lorenz’s work can also be used as evidence to support the concept of a critical period and monotropy.