Research Methods Flashcards
What is a lab experiment?
Research is conducted in a tightly controlled way and controls the variables and conducted in artificial settings.
Advantages and disadvantages of lab experiments?
-high in validity due to controlled variables
- can check reliability by redoing
- show direct cause and effect
- lack ecological validity
- may show demand characteristics and decrease validity.
What’s a field experiment?
Similar to lab except conducted in real world settings.
Advantages and disadvantages of field experiments?
-greater ecological validity than lab
-show cause and effect because IV is still manipulated
- less likely to show demand characteristics.
-researcher doesn’t have full control making it less valid
-extraneous or confounding variables.
- issues with consent.
What is a natural experiment?
IV cannot be manipulated often due to ethical reasons so the researcher takes advantage of a naturally occurring event.
Advantages and disadvantages of a natural experiment?
-make it possible to study topics that would be unethical to artificially design.
-bc the event happens naturally it’s hard to say whether the event caused the outcome.
- many extraneous variables could effect the outcome.
What is a quasi-experiment?
The researcher is not able to use random allocation to put participants in diff conditions bc the IV is a feature of the participant like gender.
Advantages and disadvantages of quasi-experiment?
-controlled conditions so more than a natural experiment.
-less artificial than a lab study so results are easier to generalise to real life and high in ecological validity,
-as IV isn’t being directly manipulated it is hard to establish cause and effect
-may be confounding variables
what it the Dependent variable?
Measured and dependent on the IV
What is the independent variable
Manipulated by a researcher to investigate whether it causes change to another variable
what is the Control variable?
Thé thing that stays the sams
what is correlational analysis?
-investigation in which they are trying to find out if theres a relationship between two variables. e.g age and intelligence.
advantages and disadvantages of correlational analysis?
-allows you to explore topics that would usually be unethical
-gives an indication as to whether there is a connection between two variables which could then be investigated further.
-cannot prove a cause and effect between two variables ie its likely that more cigs cause ill health but there could be extraneous variables.
what is a naturalistic observation?
observer simply observes what happens in a situation without interfering or manipulating variables.
advantages and disadvantages of naturalistic observations?
-less likely to suffer from demand characteristics
-raise ethical concerns
-subject to observer bias
-unreliable if observers are not trained and procedure is not standardised.
what is a controlled observation?
watching and recording behaviour in a structured environment eg variables are managed.
advantages and disadvantages of controlled observation?
-observe patients response to specific situation.
-less generalisable findings as its not in natural context.
what is a covert observation?
participants behaviour is watched and observed without knowledge or consent.
advantages and disadvantages of a covert observations?
-behaviour observed is natural.
-without informed consent.
what is an overt observation?
participants watched with knowledge and consent.
advantages and disadvantages of overt observation?
-allows informed consent.
-may not be natural behaviour.
whats a participant observation?
-researcher becomes member of the group they are watching.
advantages and disadvantages of participants observation?
-increased insight into the situation.
-less objectivity.
what is a non-participant observation?
-researcher remains outside the group they are watching.
advantages and disadvantages of non-participant observation?
- allows researcher to be more objective
-will not have the same level of insight.
what is a questionnaire?
written closed set of questions open closed structured or unstructured.
advantages and disadvantages of questionnaires?
-practical and allow large amounts of data to be collected quickly.
-suffer less from social desirability than interviews.
-leading questions can be an issue.
-participants may not answer honestly or know the answers and will lower the internal validity.
what are interviews?
-researcher speaking directly to the participants and recording their response structured, unstructured and semi-structured.
advantages and disadvantages of interviews?
-more detailed than interviews.
-affected by social desirability bias this will affect their answers and lower the internal validity.
whats a case study?
in detail study of an individual.
advantages and disadvantages of case studies?
-gives detailed and in depth data with high ecological validity.
-case studies cant be generalised to the rest of the population
-may lack validity due to investigator being objective.
what is a content analysis? *
like an observation but using written data. the researcher decides on categories or themes and then reads the text and tallies up how many times particular ideas come up or analyses the meaning of what has been written in more depth.
advantages and disadvantages of content analysis
-less likely subjective to demand characteristics.
-can provide both quantitive and qualitative data.
-may lack internal validity if researcher effects it by their opinions
-time consuming.
what are confounding variables?
-something that did affect or confound the results.
what is a non-directional hypothesis?
-states there will be a difference but or relationship between two conditions but doesnt try to predict what the difference is.
what is a directional hypothesis?
states exactly what difference or the relationship will be between conditions or participants.
what is a repeated measures design?
an experiment that uses one group of participants but exposes them to different conditions.
what are independent groups?
two or more separate groups are tested, one condition for each.
what are matched pairs design?
having two or more groups where you match participants.
evaluation of repeated measures?
-participants may do better on second test because they can practice or become bored and do worse.
- need fewer participants
-can counterbalance to balance the bad.
evaluation of independent groups?
-need twice as many participants compared to repeated measures.
-control extraneous variables that may be due to practice.
-less chance of participants becoming bored.
evaluation of matched participants?
-very time consuming to match participants.
-controls some patient variables.