Representation: Gender As A Perfomance - Judith Butler Flashcards
Butlers gender revolution
- Male and female identities are not naturally configured
- Gender does not exist inside the body
- Gender is not solely determined by primary experiences during childhood
Butlers alternative gender model
An alternative view of gendered identities
- Our genders are culturally rather than naturally formed
- Our genders are not stable but are constructed through repeated actions
Media processes that commonly marginalise female power and non-heteronormativity
- Absent representations
- Abjected representations - ‘deviants’
- Parodic representations
Abjection
The process of constructing an object or person as repulsive. Abjection is used, Butler infers, to suggest that non-heteronormative identities are unnatural
Compulsory heterosexuality
A phrase used by butler to describe the deeply entrenched social expectation that we assume male/female identities and that we engage in heterosexual relationships
Gender/sex
Butler differentiates between gender and sex. Gender, she argues, is the socially constructed identity that we assume, whilst sex refers to the body we are born with
Gender trouble
A representation or identity that falls outside of heteronormativity. Gender trouble might be inferred through; homosexuality etc.
Butler suggests that performance of gender trouble us a difficult and sometimes painful process
Gender performance
The repeating acts or rituals that continuously define our gender. Butler agues that our gender is not innate but constructed through the continuous repetitions of micro-rituals
Gender subversion
A represational process that undermines heteronormativity
Heteronormativity
The dominance of heterosexuality as a normal or preferred identity - usually accompanied by a view that gender is binary (either male or female)
Parodic representation
An initiative gender representation usually constructed using exaggeration or dissonance. Used to subjugate marginalised identities, but they also simultaneously sketch the performative nature of gender for all of us and are the fore subtly subversive
David Gauntlett hypothetical criticism evaluated
Acknowledges much of their work, but would suggest that contemporary media practices mean that heteronormativity does not completely dominate and that the media allows for diverse or fluid identity construction. He suggests that society has adopted a much more view of gender subversion than is presented by Butler.
C: Only 8.8 per cent of American prime time television shows regularly broadcast non-heterosexual characters
One of the media processes which marginalise non-heteronormativity = Absent representations
Van Zoonen hypothetical argument evaluated
Would agree with Butlers assesment that gender is a social construct but would suggest that the media reinforces male power as a result of women internalising male power and assuming the same passivity that on screen depictions of femininity construct
C: This aligns with Butlers belief that Gender, like ‘femininity’ is a socially constructed identity which we assume, while sex refers to the body we are born with.
CC: Arguably, both are Gender and our sex is subjected to social construction. Men are portrayed as physically stronger in media, and women as the antithesis of that - our sex is directly linked to our gender and how we perceive it.
Basically arguing the same thing