remembering complex event - memory errors and autobio memory Flashcards
memory error example
1922 cargo plane lost power to 2 engines and crashed into side of building in amsterdam
193 participants interviewed 10 months later
more than half reported seeing on TV
no recording of crash, no film or reenactment was ever shown on tv
when pressed for details, many provide info about speed, direction etc
also particiaptns often report seeing books or other typical items in an office when they are not there
memory networks
hypothesis regarding memory errors
if memory is a network as previously described then events are not filed away separately
instead memory for a single node involves many nodes or many pieces of highly interconnected info
these connections which can aid in retrieval can also lead us to remember incorrectly
intrusion errors
errors in which other knowledge intrudes into the remembered event
better memory = more intrusions, worse memory = fewer intrusions
bransford and johnson study = More errors were made by participants in the experimental group because they identified more sentences as being originally presented, even though they were not. to do with hammers and nails
DRM procedure
deese-roediger-mcdermott
zaps lab one
read list of words
participants recall words not on the list that would make sense to be on the list = intrusions of mistaken theme words
shema
plural schemata
knowledge about what is involved in a particular experience
can also involve scripts - conception of a seqence of actions tat occur during a particular experience eg restuarant or dentist trip
are schemata helpful in remembering stuff
can help us when remembering an event
-memory can include info not actually experience but inferred because it is expected / consistent with the schema
but schemata can also cause us to make errors when remembering an event
- you might remember seeing magazines in a denstis office even if there were none
-memories are regularised
war of ghosts experiment
had participants attempt to remember a story from a different culture
repeated reproduction
over time reproduction became shorter, contained omissions and inaccuracies
changed to make story more consistent with their own culture
misinformaiton effect
misleading information presented after a person witnesses an event can change how that person describes the event later
loftus and palmer car hit, bumbed, colided, smashed = increasing estimates of speed
loftus et al stop and yield experiment
series of slides showing a traffic accident with one of two signs = stop or yield
participants in each group were asked about whether they saw another car pass by when the red car stopped at stop (gp 1) or at yield sign (gp 2)
consistent saw sign and asked about that sign but inconsistent if sign didn’t match what they saw
what are the three hypotheses about the misinformation effect
memory trace replacement (loftus) - MPI replaces original memory
retroactive interferecne - MPI interferes but does not elimate original meomry
source monitoring error - MPI mistakenly identified as what was originally experienced. failure to distingish source of original memory
bekerian and bowers re-created loftus with one difference.. explain
loftus = slides in random order B&B = pairs of slides in chronological order - no significant effect of MPI, enough context cues to disentangle real from MPI memory. could not have happened if memory simply overwritten (goes against memory trace replacement hypothesis)
autobio memory errors
can implant false autobio memories eg eating an egg salad as children and becoming ill
also loftus got participants parents to give descriptions of childhood experiences, experimenter then chats about it with child adding new events. when discussing it later, participant remembered the new events as actually happening
can a picture recreate a memory
yes
whole hot airballon rides for example
misbeahving in class from class photo
importance of eyesitness testimony
one of the most convincing types of evidence to a jury
but can be inaccurate - mistaken identity, constructive nature of memory
ronald cotton eyewitness testimony
convicted of rape based on eyewitness account
served 11 years then exonerated by DNA evidence