RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE: Logical Positivism and Verification Flashcards

1
Q

What does supernatural mean?

A

Literally above what is natural; what can’t be described by science/laws of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are metaphysical claims?

A

Claims to do with a general interpretation of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is logical positivism?

A

The philosophical approach taken by the Vienna circle. They claimed that metaphysical and theological language are meaningless because they are neither matters of logic nor provable by empirical evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who is Moritz Schlick?

A

German philosopher and physicist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do logical positivists claim about meaningful language?

A
There are only 2 types of meaningful language: Synthetic propositions (based on evidence) 
Analytic propositions (true by definition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the verification principle?

A

Schlick argued that the meaning of a statement is its method of verification. A statement’s truth must be verified through sense experience to be meaningful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who is A. J. Ayer?

A

British philosopher who developed the VP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Ayer say about the meaning of religious statements?

A

The statements ‘God exists’ and ‘God does not exist’ are both meaningless because there is no sensory evidence to support them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quote from Ayer in Language, Truth and Logic

A

‘A sentence is factually significant … if he knows how to verify the proposition’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strength of the VP: Straightforward

A

Meaningful statements are either true by definition or else verifiable by sense experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strength of the VP: Allows ‘verification in principle’

A

It is enough to know how in theory a statement can be verified to render it meaningful. The Bible can supply verification in principle for religious statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weakness of the VP: It is itself not verifiable in principle

A

The VP is not a tautology (true by definition) and is not verifiable in principle. By its own criteria it is meaningless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weakness of the VP: The demands of the VP are too narrow

A

It rules out all language as being meaningless, including moral, aesthetic, historical statements. The VP doesn’t work when discussing matters of interpretation, hopes, fears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does cognitive mean?

A

Fact

Synthetic (depends on evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does non-cognitive mean?

A

Non-factual

Emotions, moral claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly