Relational & Collective Efficacy Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Self-Efficacy

A

Myself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Other-Efficacy

A

You

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Relational-Inferred Self-Efficacy (RISE)

A

How confident I think you are in me

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Collective Efficacy

A

The confidence we have in our group as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Group Outcomes of Interpersonal Efficacy

A
  • Team performance
  • Team cohesion
  • Teamwork
  • Goal selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outcome - Team Performance - Source

A

Leo et al., 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outcome - Team Performance - Leo et al., 2013

A
  • Spanish National League u18 soccer players

- Players with higher collective efficacy levels belonged to teams that completed the season at top level classification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outcome - Team Cohesion - Source

A

Heuze et al., 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outcome - Team Cohesion - Heuze et al., 2006

A
  • Professional basketball players
  • Positive relationship between individual-task and group-task & -social cohesion and collective efficacy
  • Players that perform badly should be looked after to prevent cohesion-efficacy downward spiral
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outcome - Teamwork - Source

A

McEwan, 2019

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outcome - Goal Selection - Source

A

Greenlees et al., 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outcome - Goal Selection - Greenlees et al., 2000

A
  • 24 participants - 8 cyclists triads
  • Asked to write goal finishing time and position
  • Low efficacy groups had significantly reduced finishing time and position
  • High efficacy groups maintained their goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Individual Outcomes of Interpersonal Efficacy

A
  • Individual performance (Heuze et al., 2006)
  • Self-efficacy (Jackson et al., 2007; 2014)
  • Effort, desire, determination
  • Satisfaction, commitment (Jackson et al., 2007)
  • Positive affect, enjoyment (Jackson et al., 2014)
  • Participation in sport (Jackson et al., 2014)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Jackson et al., 2007

A
  • 60 doubles pairs junior tennis
  • Self-efficacy
  • Satisfaction, commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jackson et al., 2014

A
  • Interdependent sports teams
  • Undergraduate physical activity
  • Self-efficacy
  • Positive affect, enjoyment
  • Participation in sport
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Antecedents of Interpersonal Efficacy - Source

A

Lent & Lopez, 2002

17
Q

Lent & Lopez, 2002 - Antecedents of Interpersonal Efficacy

A
  • Performance Experiences
  • Verbal persuasion
  • Vicarious experiences
  • Physiological and emotional states
18
Q

Performance experiences

A
  • Strongest predictor of interpersonal efficacy
19
Q

Verbal Persuasion - Source

A

Fransen et al., 2014

20
Q

Fransen et al., 2014 - Verbal persuasion

A
  • Coaches and players from all levels - volleyball

Most predictive of positive efficacy:

  • Athlete leaders expressing belief in team
  • Enthusiastic cheering between rallies
  • A lot of communication
21
Q

Vicarious experiences - Source

A

Bruton et al., 2014

22
Q

Bruton et al., 2014 - Vicarious experiences

A
  • Observation of others
  • University basketball squad - familiar
  • Other interactive sports teams - unfamiliar
  • Showed positive video footage
  • Familiar group had greater increases in collective efficacy
  • Shows importance of model, action and environmental similarity
  • Still increases in unfamiliar group
23
Q

Physiological and emotional states - Source

A

Son et al., 2011

24
Q

Son et al., 2011 - Physiological and emotional states

A
  • Practising self-talk focused on group’s capabilities increased efficacy beliefs
25
Q

Considerations for coaches - Source

A

Fransen et al., 2014

26
Q

Fransen et al., 2014 - Considerations for coaches

A
  • Target 4 antecedents
  • Coaching efficacy athlete/team efficacy
  • Mastery climate
  • Positive, effective communication
  • Fitness important