Reconstructive memory & schemas Flashcards

1
Q

Who proposed the idea of reconstructive memory?

A

Bartlett (1932)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a schema?

A

A mental framework of beliefs and expectations based off previous experiences which allow us to make sense of things and fill in gaps in our knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by input in terms of reconstructive memory?

A

Perception of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is meant by processing in terms of reconstructive memory?

A

Interpretation of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is effort after meaning?

A

When people try to make sense of a situation in terms of what they already know by using schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does information get distorted?

A

Our schemas reconstruct our memories by filling in gaps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by rationalisation?

A

Getting rid of something from a memory to help it make sense using our schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by confabulation?

A

Making something up in a memory to help it make sense using our schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a strength of Bartlett’s reconstructive memory?

War of the ghosts study - PEE

A

P - Supporting evidence from Bartlett’s war of the ghosts study
E - He tested British ppts’ recollection of a Native American folk tale and found that they altered the story, such as people dying at sunset or missing out parts completely such as the ghosts.
E - Therefore, this shows that rationalisation and confabulation are used to make sense of something unfamiliar, using our schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a weakness of Bartlett’s reconstructive memory?

Treyan and Brewer (1989) - PEE

A

P - Opposing evidence from Treyan and Brewer (1989)
E - They placed objects in an office that are not commonly associated with that environment and told ppts to sit there for a number of minutes before being called in for a ‘job interview’ in which they were asked to recall the objects. They found that the majority recalled the unusual items such as the skull.
E - This is not what is predicted using the schema theory as ppts would have disregarded unusual items with rationalisation otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a strength of Bartlett’s reconstructive memory?

Application EWT - PEE

A

P - Can be used to explain problems with eye-witness testimonies
E - Research on EWT (e.g Loftus and Palmer, 1974) have subsequently shown that people do not always recall what they see or hear accurately
E - Therefore, we can provide solutions such as informing juries of the inaccuracies of EWT and not convicting on EWT alone due to its unreliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly