Receptors: Binding to Response Flashcards
Two properties of a receptor
Recognition and Transduction
Recognition
binds ligands reversibly with high affinity and specificity
Transduction
structural-dependent conversion of this binding into a cellular response, reflected in “activity” or “efficacy”
with in cell mechanism to propagate signal -> response
Receptor location
usually located in membrane communicates between outside and inside of cell; allows specific binding that turns into specific response
receptor binds
and responds to that binding -> cell response -> organ response -> binding response
Receptor vs enzyme
both bind with specificity but enzyme only convert substrate to product, this is not reversible except at binding site; receptors bind reversibility but aren’t converted, receptors leads to response
ligand
the thing binding to the receptor
3 criteria for receptor binding interaction
- Specificity
- Saturability
- Reversibility
Specificity
ligand should be structurally complimentary to receptor, producing a structurally specific and high affinity interaction
Saturabilty
finite number of receptors per cell should be present as revealed by saturable binding curve (only certain number of sites for ligand)
reversibility
after binding to receptor the ligand must dissociate in an unchanged form; concentration of drug decreases drug can dissociate and receptor can relax until next round
slower the rate the ___ the Kd
slower the rate the smaller the Kd and larger the on rate
If [L]= 0
not bound increase this to infinity; [RL] = tot # of receptors
Kd is when
1/2 of receptors are occupied
low Kd
high affinity
high Kd
low affinity
Saturation Isotherm Direct Plot
Concentration of bound ligand plotted as a function of concentration of free ligand producing rectangular hyperbola; Maximum binding approached asymptomatically as ligand concentration increases and is equal to concentration of receptors [R1]; concentration free ligand at which 50% binding sites occupied equal to Kd
Saturation Isotherm: Log Plot
concentration of bound ligand plotted as function of logarithm of free ligand concentration; this gives you a nice curve
Inhibition of Binding
competitive inhibition; ligands that bind to receptor at same site will inhibit each other’s binding competitively; if 1 is binding other can’t but this is reversible just increase concentration of one in the presence of other and get to saturation and compete out the other one
effect of competitive inhibition
decrease apparent affinity of measured ligand (L1) but have no effect on maximum binding of saturation ([Rt]); in presence of competitive inhibitor (L2) the apparent dissociation constant of the measured ligand (L1) increases (bc high Kd low affinity); magnitude or response directly proportional to amount of ligand bound; assumes Ed50= Kd
Kd’
apparent Kd this is what changes not actual Kd when there is presence of competitive inhibitor, this leads to a shift R; the Kd as in the property of the thing itself does not change
Binding to Response: Classical Theory
It was thought that response was directly related to agonist occupation of receptor but this is not the case for a lot of systems where things similar in structure to RA not enough to make response bc structural dependence to binding that can lead to conformational change in receptor that leads to response
Competitive inhibitor binding
can have competitive inhibitor that binds and doesn’t lead to conformational change but blocks to things that would
Classical Theory EC50
EC50 (concentration of agonist that produces 50% of maximum response) is = to KDapp (concentration of agonist at which 50% of receptors are occupied)
Classical theory true for
activated receptor (response and binding follow) but if you go downstream of this will cause depolarization and will curve at lower concentration
Binding to Response: Modified classical theory
Response can occur at much lower concentrations than binding and apparent affinity for response can be much higher than for binding b/c of amplification fo signal that produces “spare receptors” (ie there are more receptors than we need to produce max response bc if you knock out receptors you still get max response); cell amplifies stimulus so get response in cell that is shifted L so can get max response with less than 100% of receptors occupied