Reasoning and Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the occurrence of ambiguous terms whose meanings are confused in an argument

A

Fallacies of Ambiguity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

It is committed when several meanings of a word or phrase become confused in the context of one argument

A

Fallacy of Equivocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

It is committed when one reason from the qualities of the parts of a whole to the qualities of the whole itself

A

Fallacy of Composition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

It is committed which is the reverse of composition, is committed when one reason from the qualities of a whole to the qualities of the parts of the whole

A

Fallacy of Division

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the irrelevance of the premise or premises to the conclusion of an argument

A

Fallacies of Relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

It is committed when it is argued that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proven false, or that is false because it has not been proven true. This is a fallacy because our ignorance of how to prove or disprove a proposition does not necessarily establish either its truth or falsehood.

A

Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Committed when one appeals to an authority whose field of expertise does not include the nature of conclusion being established

A

Argumentum Ad Verecundiam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Committed when one evaluates an argument by means of citing something about the person who asserts said argument. In this case, an argument is often claimed to be wrong because of some negative qualities of the person who asserted an argument

A

Argumentum Ad Hominem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Committed when one appeals to pity to cause the acceptance of a conclusion

A

Argumentum Ad Misericordiam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Committed when one appeals to general, common, popular, or stereotypical prejudices or beliefs to cause acceptance of some conclusion

A

Argumentum Ad Antiquitatem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Committed when one appeals to force, often with subtlety, to cause the acceptance of a conclusion

A

Argumentum Ad Baculum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Referring to fallacies in which the error in reasoning is brought about by the occurrence of complex or loaded expressions whose assumptions are questionable or have not yet been proven to be true

A

Fallacies of Presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Committed when one asks a question that contains unproved assumptions. A fallacy is committed when one argues that these assumptions are true just because the answer is given to the complex question

A

The Fallacy of Complex Question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Committed when one attributes wrong cause to something, which is often due to a mere temporal succession of two events

A

The Fallacy of False Cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Committed when reasoning is circular in which the conclusion is already assumed in the premises

A

The Fallacy of Petitio Principii

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Committed when one applies a general rule to individual cases, which, because of their special or accidental nature, the general rule does not properly apply

A

The Fallacy of Accident

17
Q

Committed when one makes a generalization from a special or accidental case, or simply from insufficient number of cases

A

The Fallacy of Dicto Simpliciter

18
Q

This process enables us to justify or prove the truth of a statement or belief on the basis of the truth of another statement or belief

A

Reasoning

19
Q

An end result of reasoning or inference. Since it concern truth, it can only consist of statements

A

Argument

20
Q

Provides a justification for the conclusion

A

Premise

21
Q

What follows from or is proven by the premise

A

Conclusion

22
Q

It is necessary, meaning, we are sure about its truth for there is no possibility that it is false

A

Certain

23
Q

It is only likely to be true for there is a possibility that it is false

A

Probable

24
Q

The truth of the premises is intended to prove that the truth of the conclusion is certain. It is consequently either valid or invalid

A

Deductive argument

25
Q

A deductive argument that is valid and that contains premises that are all true

A

Sound deductive argument

26
Q

Deductive argument that is valid and that contains at least one premise that is false

A

Unsound deductive argument

27
Q

The truth of the premises is intended to prove that the truth of the conclusion is highly probable. It is consequently either strong or weak

A

Inductive argument

28
Q

Errors and the cases of weak inductive reasoning

A

Fallacies

29
Q

Also known as converse accident, is the most typical case of fallacy. It occurs when we make a general conclusion from an insufficient number of cases

A

Hasty generalization

30
Q

Committed when we conclude that two things must have a certain similarity because they already have other similarities but which are either insufficient in number or irrelevant to the conclusion

A

Weak analogy

31
Q

A strong inductive argument in which all premise are true

A

Cogent

32
Q

A strong inductive argument in which at least one premise is false

A

Uncogent

33
Q

Errors in reasoning due solely to an incorrect form or structure of an argument. They thus, correspond to the invalid deductive arguments

A

Formal fallacies

34
Q

Also known as material fallacies, are errors in reasoning due to solely to an anomaly or defect in the content of an argument. They are usually psychological persuasive and that is why there are the ones commonly committed

A

Informal fallacies