RE: Religious Pluralism and Theology Flashcards

1
Q

what are some arguments in favour of religious pluralism (all religions equally correct)?

A
  • john stuart mill said that religions are like different paths up a mountain that all lead to the same place.
  • religions have the same ideas of God and same ideas of right and wrong.
  • ‘in my father’s house are many rooms’ - John 14:2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are some arguments in favour of inclusivism (one religion fully true, others partially true)?

A
  • some don’t know about Jesus.
  • others who do good will also be included in God’s kingdom.
  • people are unknowingly included in christ’s salvation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are some arguments in favour of exclusivism (other religions false)?

A
  • if you don’t believe in Jesus as the Lord savour, you cannot enter heaven as it’s the one saving truth.
  • 3 things in place to enter heaven: faith in christ, share the gospel, be a member of the christian church.
  • st. Cyprian said ‘outside the church there’s no salvation’.
  • supported by the doctrine of the justification of faith. Martin Luther used st. Paul’s teachings from Romans, you’re rejecting God if you don’t have faith in Jesus.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what do exclusivists believe about God?

A

believe in an immanent God who intervenes in the world through visions and miracles. this is to make himself known as he desires people to come and know him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the arguments in favour of christians being religous exclusivists?

A
  • you must have faith in christ, share the gospel and be a member of the church to enter heaven.
  • st cyprian - ‘there’s no salvation outside the church’.
  • supported by the doctrine of justification of faith.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the arguments against christians being religious exclusivists?

A
  • why should people who’ve lived good lives be punished?
  • not all christians share the same opinion.
  • john stuart mill (pluralist) argues that all religions are equally true.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were Karl Ranher’s views as an inclusivist?

A
  • agrees that christ alone can save people from salvation.
  • however, this faith in jesus can be invisible/not obvious. religion may be distorted in a way but they still have a desire to be with christ.
  • defends the ‘solus christus’ principle but thinks there can be salvation outside the church.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the catholic church’s inclusivist views?

A
  • no salvation ouside the church, but argues that what counts as being a christian isn’t known to us.
  • God will not condemn anyone unfairly, he knows what’s going on inside people’s hearts and consciences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did Tim Barnett argue against inclusivism?

A
  • every religion has a part of the truth.
  • uses the elephant fable, refers to the Raja as being a religious inclusivist. inclusivism is arrogant.
  • significant elements of different religions contradict eachother.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the benefits of a multi-faith society?

A

`-more tolerant

  • remove prejudice.
  • educational
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the problems of a multi faith society?

A
  • different ideologies could cause conflict.

- can reduce social cohesion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are arguments in favour of the scriptural reasoning movement?

A
  • gives people a way to discuss different religious views informally.
  • more understanding of different religions as well as your own.
  • not threatened by others.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are arguments against the scriptural reasoning movement?

A
  • might not work
  • ‘preaching to the converted’
  • involves just ordinary people, not academics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the aims or the ALPHA Anglican Christian organisation?

A
  • set up by the church of England to teach non-Christians the basics of the Christian faith.
  • since 1990 it’s been offered as a series of introductory sessions to non-Christians, who can learn about Christianity and the Christian meaning of life.
  • has since been adopted by Christian denominations worldwide.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why should Christians seek to convert people?

A
  • Human rights: we have the right to practice our religion, this can include preaching/evangelisation.
  • jesus tells us to ‘make disciples of all nations’.
  • if atheists have the same rights to convert Christians so we should have the same right.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why shouldn’t Christians seek to convert people?

A
  • doesn’t help social cohesion
  • violence can be a result of an attempt at conversion, can be perceived as an assault on someone’s faith.
  • pluralists would believe that all religions are equally true.
  • can be seen as forcing beliefs on someone else.
17
Q

what is relativism?

A

the doctrine that knowledge, truth and morality exist in relation to culture, society or historical context, and are not absolute.

18
Q

how does the scriptural reasoning movement relativise religious beliefs?

A
  • everyone has to agree with eachother
  • impossible to say that contradictory claims are both true.
  • must be some kind of absolute truth.
19
Q

how does the scriptural reasoning movement not relativise religious beliefs?

A
  • god is beyond human understanding anyway.

- many messages in scripture remain similar.

20
Q

How is Christianity the only means in which a person can achieve salvation?

A
  • Christianity is different to other religions because Jesus is God incarnate, as opposed to a prophet. Christ is the only means whereby we can be saved and enjoy the beatific vision in heaven.
  • bible teachings such as ‘no one comes to the Father except through me’- Jesus John 14:16
  • protestant reformers argued that there must be faith in Christ in order for salvation to happen.
  • Karl Rahner and inclusivism: he said that faithful followers of other religions have an implicit desire to be with Christ. they don’t know Christ through no fault of their own.
21
Q

How isn’t Christianity the only means in which a person can achieve salvation?

A
  • pluralists believe that there are other equally valid ways of achieving salvation.
  • John Hick, salvation should be based on God rather than Jesus. Society should be theocentric instead of Christocentric.
  • John Hick: universalism - everyone will be saved.
  • John Hick also said that religion varies based on birthplace. if someone was born in India, they’d likely be Hindu, Christian in Europe etc.
22
Q

what were Karl Ranher’s 4 thesis, explain each.

A

first thesis:
Christianity is the one true religion. this is because it has the doctrine of incarnation whereas other religions do not. This is the basis of God’s relationship with humanity.

second thesis:
a non-Christian religion can mediate salvation, so non-Christians can contain God’s grace. However, alongside knowledge of God, they also contain ‘depravity’. he also states his reasons for inclusivism

third thesis:
faithful members of other religions can be ‘anonymous Christians’

fourth thesis:
the Christian church makes the implicit explicit through missionaries etc.

23
Q

How has inter-faith dialogue contributed towards social cohesion?

A

-members of the SRM would argue that