Raising The Profile Of Civil Rights - Kicking Jim Crow Out Of School Flashcards
In 1949 what did the state of South Carolina spend on educating white and black children?
White child - average of $179
Black child - average of $43
Why did the NAACP target education?
Because it was easy to show that while children were being educated separately they were not being educated equally.
Also improving education of AAs was a vital step to improving their general living standards.
When was Sweatt Vs Painter
1950
What was Sweatt Vs Painter about?
Herman Sweatt was a black student hoping to study law In the southern state of Texas.
Texas education system was segregated, so he was refused admission.
NAACP challenged this and said Sweatt was entitled to equal education of whites as Law School.
The courts in Texas decided to open a new law school for black people.
NAACP took this to supreme court and argued that the new law school was inferior to the whites one. For example it had less books and fewer teachers.
What was the outcome of Sweatt vs Painter?
The supreme court agreed with NAACP and ordered Texas law school to accept Sweatt as a student.
Sweatt registered as a student on 19 September 1950
What is the significance of Sweatt vs Painter?
It was the NAACP’s first successful challenge to segregation in the south.
Also the success gave them the confidence to keep going and keep fighting against the segregation.
When was Brown Vs Board of Education?
1954
What happened in Brown Vs Board of Education?
Oliver Brown took state of Kansas to court for failing to provide his daughter Linda with an adequate education.
She was forced to attend the all black school 20 blocks away, whereas she would be better attending the whites school which was much closer.
What was the outcome of Brown Vs Board of Education?
After 3 years of legal battles (NAACP took case to supreme court). The supreme court decided that segregation was illegal in American schools.
What was the significance of Brown Vs Board of Education?
The court argued that the “separate but equal” of Plessy vs Ferguson 1896 was impossible.
It was impossible for citizens to receive services that were both equal and separate. It ended the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’
Why did the supreme court make this decision? (5)
- they argued that segregation had a negative effect on black people
- supreme court recognised that America was changing. Between 1945-1954 AA middle class had undergone lots of growth. Middle class AAs had better knowledge of legal system and were more likely the challenge racial inequality in the court. Supreme court felt under pressure to rule in their favour.
- they recognised that southern states lacked economic resources to raise standard of black schools. Only way to do this was to integrate the schools.
- supreme court recognised that a racist education system did not reflect ideals that America was fighting for in cold war. At least one supreme court judge said that segregated education undermined Americas ability to Champion democracy.
- Chief judge Frederick Moore Vinson died in 1953 and was replaced by Earl Warren. Warren was much more sympathetic to civil rights issues and used to authority in civil right’s favour.
Reaction to Brown Vs Board of Education: Black American (3)
Many believed this was the beginning of the end of segregation
Gave the idea that supreme court would back legal challenges made by AAs
Following the case there was an increase in local activism by groups such as NAACP and CORE. Who organised new campaigns against different aspects of segregation.
Reaction to Brown Vs Board of Education: Whites (3)
Provoked series of initiatives across the south amp imbed at undermining the ruling.
White citizens council was set up and raised money in order to help schools to become private so that they could avoid desegregating.
They also campaigned for election of southern politicians who were strongly opposed to desegregation.
By 1956 how many members did White Citizens Councils have?
250,000
Case of Emmett Till
A 14 year old black boy was lynched and beaten in 1955. His murderers were not found guilty by an all white jury in spite of intensive campaigns by NAACP.