QUOTES: U4 AOS1 -> WW1 Flashcards
Documentary: ‘The War That Changed Us’ (on impact of WW1)
WW1 “drove a wedge right through Australian society”
On the 31st of July 1914, the Opposition Leader, Andrew Fisher, famously committed Australia to supporting Britain…
“to the last man and the last shilling.”
DIFFERING HISTORIAN PERSPECTIVE: Historian Ken Inglis states that (about the divisive nature of Historian perspectives on the 1st referendum for conscription):
“The result was thus achieved so narrowly that any one of a number of things can be said to have been decisive; and historians can choose, according to taste and interest, the Easter Rising or the canniness of farmers or some other factor. It might even be argued without much perversity that the vote of soldiers was in a sense decisive.”
STATISTICS ON THE 1ST REFERENDUM
The 1st plebiscite rules from the 28th of OCT 1916: South Australia most strongly voted against conscription with 57.56% saying NO whilst Western Australia most strongly voted for conscription with 69.71% of people voting YES
A left-wing socialist newspaper warned that conscription would result in Australian women marrying Indian/Chinese men which attempt to appeal to prevalent racist attitudes in AUS by emphasising that:
“you don’t win the war if you substitute [people of colour] for Australians” (Adcock et al.)
STATISTICS ON THE 2ND REFERENDUM RESULTS
Votes in favour of conscription fell by 7,200 whilst votes against conscription rose by 21,000
Archbishop Daniel Mannix’s anti-conscriptionist views which he reconfirmed in 1962:
“I wanted to win the war. I wanted to promote voluntary enlistment, but I did not want conscription.
Vida Goldstein, during WW1 in particular, advocated
“to conserve life”
Historian David Day on Australia’s eager involvement in WW1:
“As an integral part of the British Empire, there [was] no question of Australia standing aside. It was convinced that its fate rested on Britain’s.”
Historian David Day on Australia’s eager involvement in WW1:
“Australian identity was so intermingled with that of a grander British imperial identity, that sentiment alone would have impelled Australians into battle’
Historian John Lack on censorship in WW1
“Censorship […] was imposed at three levels: in the field by the Allied armies, by quarantining correspondents from the action, and by correspondents, anxious for lively copy, imaginatively dressing up the scant information they received.”
Historian John Lack on censorship in WW1
“Reports of failure were delayed, uninformative, bereft of truth and realism, and flavoured with upbeat and victorious terminology.”
Extract from the ‘War Precautions Act 1914’ on possible penalties for violating the act
“One hundred pounds or six months’ imprisonment, or both.”
Extract from the ‘War Precautions Act 1914’ explaining the act
“Australian press coverage of the Great War, even by Australian official war correspondents, was from the outset characterised by optimism, anticipations of glorious success, and silence about the horrors and huge casualties”
Extract from the Manifesto issued by The National Executive at the Australian Trade Union Congress in 1916:
“conscription has been used to render null and void all the achievements of Trade unionism”
Extract from the manifesto issued by The National Executive at the Australian Trade Union Congress in 1916
“conscription has been used not merely as an instrument of national defence, but as a bludgeon to break down the standard of the industrial classes.”
Billy Hughes in November 1917 in support of conscription:
“There are men in Australia, and they must fight.”
A catholic view on conscription cited in ‘The Argus’, 30 November 1917
“The church as a whole was loyal to Empire and the British throne.”
‘Propaganda and the Conscription Debate’, unknown curator at the Old Treasury Building
“The conscription debate generated an enormous volume of propaganda material.”