psychopathology Flashcards
psychopathology (A01)
scientific study of psychological disorders-when someone has physical disorder- doctor will examine patients symptoms + run various tests in order to make correct diagnose
definitions of abnormality: deviation from social norms (A01)
Concerns behaviour that is different from accepted standards of behaviour in community or society
each society have unwritten rules for acceptable behaviour-‘norms’-classes any abnormal behaviour if goes against accepted, expected + approved ways of behaving in society-abnormality breaking ‘rules of society’
eg. eating w/your family on dining table compared to eating by yourself in front of TV
deviation from social norms: changes vary (A03) (1)
P: main difficulty w/definition-social norms change vary as times change
E: what is socially acceptable now may not be socially acceptable 50yrs ago
E: eg. today homosexuality is acceptable but in past it was under ‘sexual + gender identity disorders’ in DSM
L: lacks consistency-reduces reliability of definition abnormality
deviation from social norms: vary between cultures (A03) (2)
P: definition abnormality-social norms differ between different cultures
E: norms are culturally relative
E: eg-hearing voices is viewed as deviation from social norms in our culture but in others-more accepted + not necessarily views as deviant behaviour
L: problem-argued reliable definition should consistent between cultures
deviation from social norms: punishing people who are trying to express their individuality (A03) (3)
P: abnormality can be seen as punishing people who are trying to express their individuality + repressing people who don’t conform to repressive norms of their cultures
E: eg. world health organisation (WHO) declassified homosexuality as mental illness in 1992 + transgender health issue in 2019
E: recent changes may have followed social norms/acceptance
L: limitation-definition of abnormality-damaging to certain people in society-so another definition could be seen as more appropriate
definitions of abnormality: failure to function adequately (A01)
someone is unable to cope w/ordinary demands of day-to-day living
eg. unable hold down job OR may struggle w/everyday activities: always running late
not attending school
not eating + not sleeping
not functioning adequately causes distress + suffering for individual + maybe for others-bc in case of some mental disorders-individual may not be distressed at all-people w/schizophrenia lack awareness-but may be distressing to others
deviation from social norms: its a more appropriate definition of abnormality (A03) (4)
P: strength-more appropriate definition of abnormality-compared to ‘statistically infrequency’ definition
E: distinguishes between desirable + undesirable behaviour + effect behaviour has on others
E: eg. spending lots of time washing your hands may not be statistically infrequent -but can damaging effect on person + loved ones
L: strength-more appropriate definition of abnormal behaviour
failure to function adequately: includes persons perspective (A03) (1)
P: strength-includes persons perspective
E: allows us to view mental disorder-from point of view of person experiencing it
E: eg. level of distress experienced by patient is considered when defining their behaviour as abnormal
L: suggests failure to function adequately is useful criteria for assessing abnormality-provides checklist which patients-use to help them perceive their level of functioning
failure to function adequately ROSENHAN+SELIGMAN: characteristics of abnormality (A01)
- Suffering-abnormal person should be suffering in some way
- Maladaptive behaviour-where person is stopping themselves from progressing
- Unconventionality (odd)-to be abnormal-their behaviour needs odd in someways
- Unpredictable + loss of control-most people tend to behave-in fairly predictable way on other hand an abnormal person-expected act-inappropriate manner
- Irrational + incomprehensibility-instances someone may act certain way which people can’t understand
failure to function adequately: cultural realism (A01)
Idea that persons beliefs, values + practices-should be understood based on persons own culture-rather than be judged against criteria of another
failure to function adequately: limited in cultural realism (A03) (3)
P: limited in cultural realism
E: long periods of grief after bereavement is more acceptable in some cultures than others
E: so same behaviour could be defined as abnormal-viewed as failure to function in 1 culture yet functioning adequately in another culture
L: problem-definition-be classed as reliable-the same behaviour should be viewed consistently between cultures
failure to function adequately: abnormality-not always accompanied by dysfunction (A03) (2)
P: abnormality-not always accompanied by dysfunction-psychopaths-people w/dangerous personality disorders can cause great harm yet still appear normal
E: Harold Shipman-GP murdered 215 of his patients over 23yr period-seemed to be respectable doctor
E: he was abnormal-didnt display features of dysfunction
L: definition to define abnormality may not be appropriate
failure to function adequately: abnormality could be due to other factors (A03) (4)
P: abnormality could be due to other factors
E: eg. someone who is unable to hold down job-may be in situation due to economical reasons in their country-not their mental health
E: so using this definition-people would incorrectly be labelled as abnormal-when other definitions may not label them as abnormal
L: suggest that definition is not appropriate in all classes + another definition may be more valid on occasions
definitions of abnormality: statistical infrequency (A01)
Occurs when an individual has less common characteristic-
eg. being more depressed or less intelligent than most of population
any behaviour-statically rare is abnormal-requires us to examine normal distribution curve in order
Things such as height, weight + intelligence fall w/in fairly broad areas -People outside these areas might be considered abnormally tall or short, fat or thin, clever or unintelligent
statistical terms they are abnormal because their behaviour is infrequent in population eg. 2 standard deviations from mean
statistical infrequency: objective way to define abnormality as clear ‘cut off’ point has been agreed (A03) (1)
P: objective way to define abnormality as clear ‘cut off’ point has been agreed
E+ E: makes it easier to decide who meets criteria to be labelled as abnormal in comparison to other definitions
L: definition is seen as less subjective than other definitions
statistical infrequency: normality + abnormality need to be separated (A03) (3)
P: separate normality from abnormality
E + E: depression vary greatly between individuals in terms of their severity-makes it difficult to decide where cut-off point lies eg. at what point does crying become abnormal?
L: problem as cut-off point is subjectively determined lacking validity needed to be an effective method of defining abnormality
statistical infrequency: many abnormal behaviours that are actually quite desirable (A03) (2)
P: many abnormal behaviours that are actually quite desirable
E + E: eg. very few people have an IQ of over 150 yet it would not be suggested that having a high IQ is undesirable + there are some normal behaviours that are undesirable eg. experiencing depression after painful experience is quite common yet it is undesirable
L: problem when planning treatment as only undesirable behaviours need to be identified definition would never be used alone to make diagnosis
statistical infrequency: culturally biased (A03) (4)
P: culturally biased
E: there are some behaviours that are statistically infrequent in some cultures but are more frequent in others eg. 1 of symptoms of schizophrenia is claiming to hear voices
E: an experience that is common in some cultures
L: problematic as statistical infrequency definition would class these individuals as abnormal even when they were displaying normal behaviour- definition can only be used to define abnormality in some cultures
definitions of abnormality: deviation from mental health (A01)
attempts to define criteria required for normality- people who lack these criteria are defined as abnormal
Marie Jahoda defined ideal mental health through a list of six characteristics which argue that psychologically healthy individual with ideal mental health should be able to show
deviation from mental health MARIE JAHODA: six characteristics (A01)
Perception of reality –should be able to ‘see the world as it is’
Resistance to stress – Being able to cope w/stressful situations
self-Attitude- High self-esteem + strong sense of self-identity
Autonomy- should function as independent individuals
Self-actualisation– Being focused on future + on fulfilling their potential
Environmental Mastery- ability to adjust to new situations functioning at work + in relationships w/others
fewer of these qualities you have more abnormal you are seen to be
deviation from mental health: culturally biased (A03) (2)
P: culturally biased
E: bc ideals of mental health are not applicable to all cultures
E: eg. criterion of self-actualisation is relevant to members of individualistic cultures but not collectivists’ cultures, where individuals strive for greater good of community rather than for self-centred goals
L: problem bc for definition to be classed as reliable- same behaviour should be viewed consistently between cultures
deviation from mental health: offers an alternative perspective on mental disorders (A03) (1)
P: offers an alternative perspective on mental disorders
E+ E: definition focuses on positives rather than negatives
L: Jahoda’s ideas therefore are in accord w/humanistic approach which also focuses on positive aspects of human nature
deviation from mental health: unclear about criteria (A03) (3)
P: unclear how many criteria need to be lacking before we are seen to be ‘deviating from ideal mental health’
E: do all 6 criterion need to be present or could we lack 1 or 2 + still be viewed as normal?
E: order to make this decision subjective judgement must be make-left to individual psychiatrists to judge whether someone is deviating enough to be diagnosed + this could lead to inconsistency
L: lack of objectivity means that this definition of abnormality is rarely used in real world
Behavioural, Emotional + Cognitive Characteristics of Phobias: DSM (A01)
no. of systems for classifying + diagnosing mental health problems
Perhaps the best known is DSM -Diagnostic + Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders which is published by American Psychiatric Association
DSM is updated every so often as ideas about abnormality change current version is DSM-5 published in 2013
Behavioural, Emotional + Cognitive Characteristics of Phobias: DSM-5 Categories of Phobias (A01)
Specific phobia: Also known as simple phobia this is fear of an object, such as an animal, or situation such as flying or having an injection
Social phobia: Phobia of social situation such as public speaking or using public toilet
Agoraphobia: Fear of leaving home or safe place- Can be characterised by fear of being outside or in public place
behavioural characteristics of phobias: panic (A01)
phobic people panic in response to presence of phobic stimuli
Panic can be in form of behaviours such as crying, screaming, running away or freezing
behavioural characteristics of phobias: avoidance (A01)
anxiety increases by being close to feared situation- natural to avoid certain situations where object will be
eg. if someone has fear of ghosts they do not take short-cut home through graveyard at midnight
behavioural characteristics of phobias: disruption of functioning (A01)
Anxiety + avoidance responses are so extreme that they severely interfere w/ability to conduct everyday working + social functioning
eg. person w/social phobia will find it very hard to socialise w/others or indeed interact meaningfully w/ them at work
emotional characteristics of phobias: anxiety (A01)
unpleasant state of high arousal which makes it very difficult to experience any positive emotions
anxiety experienced can be long term- due to presence of or anticipation of feared objects + situations
emotional characteristics of phobias: fear (A01)
emotional responses of fear which accompanies many phobic stimuli is often extremely unreasonable
eg. an individual’s fear of spiders will involve very strong emotional response to tiny, harmless spider
fear is disproportionate to actual danger posed by spider
cognitive characteristics of phobias: irrational beliefs (A01)
Sufferers often hold irrational beliefs in relation to phobic stimuli- also very resistant to rational arguments
eg. person w/fear of flying is not helped by arguments that flying is actually safest form of transport
cognitive characteristics of phobias: selective attention (A01)
Sufferers will often look intently at phobic stimulus + find it very difficult to look away from them
usually useful to keep our attention on something dangerous so we can react to threat quickly
not useful when fear is irrational as this can interfere w/day to day life eg. pogonophobia will struggle to concentrate on what they’re doing if someone in room has a beard
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: CC initiation (A01)
phobia is acquired through association of stimulus w/response eg. Watson + Rayner induced fear of white rats in Little Albert by pairing rat loud noise resulted in new stimulus being learnt
eg. fear of dogs after being bitten:
Being bitten (UCS) creates fear (UCR)
Dog (NS) associated w/being bitten (UCS)
Dog (now CS) produces fear response (now CR)
same steps can explain how person might develop fear of social situations after having panic attack in such situation
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: 2 process model (A01)
phobias are acquired- learned in first place by CC + maintained bc of OP
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: OC maintaining (A01)
W/negative reinforcement individual avoids situation that is unpleasant
eg. person w/fear of dogs will avoid visiting friends w/dogs person w/ fear of enclosed spaces will avoid going into lift
avoiding phobic stimulus allows them to escape fear + anxiety that they would have suffered if they had remained
reduction in fear reinforces avoidance behaviour + maintains phobia
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: tested in objective + rigorous ways (A03) (1)
P: tested in an objective + rigorous way
E + E: Mowrer tested his two-process model by pairing buzzer sound w/ an electric shock- use of negative reinforcement Mower trained rats to escape shock by jumping over barrier when buzzer sounded
L: matters bc it increases scientific validity of behaviourist explanation of phobias
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: practical applications (A03) (2)
P: practical applications
E: several behavioural therapies which use principles of conditioning to successful treat phobias eg. ‘systematic desensitisation’ has been shown to be an extremely successful therapy for range of different phobias
E: McGrath et al who found that 75% of phobic patients showed an improvement in their symptoms after treatment
L: success of these treatments strengthens validity of behaviourist explanation of phobias
Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: fails to explain role evolution plays in many people’s fears (A03) (3)
P: fails to explain role evolution plays in many people’s fears
E + E: Seligman found in his research that we are innately predisposed to fear such things as snakes + spider as these things have been source of danger in our evolutionary past- helps to explain why people may have fear of things they have never experienced or encountered
L: 2 process model may be too simplistic as this suggests there is more to acquiring phobia than simply conditioning