memory Flashcards
coding (A01)
way information is changed so that it can be stored in memory- thought that STM codes information acoustically whereas LTM codes information semantically
research on coding (A01)
Baddeley gave different lists of words to four groups of Ps to remember-mistakes made show encoding in that part of memory:
Group 1 acoustically similar: words sounded similar
Group 2 acoustically dissimilar: words sounded different
Group 3 semantically similar: words with similar meanings
Group 4 semantically dissimilar: words that had different meanings
research on coding study: STM (A01)
asked to recall words straight away group 1- acoustically similar words had WORST recall suggests that information is encoded acoustically in STM
STM gets confused when it must retrieve words which are acoustically similar and muddles them up resulting in fewer being remembered- can still retrieve semantically similar words because STM pays no attention to what words mean + therefore doesn’t become confused by words that mean same thing
research on coding study: LTM (A01)
When asked to recall the words after 20 minutes group three- semantically similar words had WORST recall
suggests that information is encoded semantically in LTM
LTM gets confused by similar meanings same way that STM gets confused by similar sounds.
research on coding: evidence from lab studies (A03) (1)
P: strength of research on coding is that research is often conducted in controlled laboratory conditions
E + E: eg. Baddeley’s study allowed for manipulation of the type of words presented to Ps + also allowed for control of extraneous variables such as noise level + how far away Ps were from screen
L: strength bc we can be confident that coding in STM is acoustic + semantic in LTM + thus research has high internal validity
research on coding: may have not tested LTM (A03) (2)
P: weakness of research ion coding is that it is not clear how long we need to wait to test the LTM
E + E: Baddeley tested STM by asking Ps to recall a word list immediately after hearing it + LTM was tested by waiting 20 minutes
L: weakness bc perhaps we should have waited longer than this amount of time to measure LTM as there are much longer gaps between learning and recall in real life- putting into question whether coding of LTM is actually semantic
capacity (A01)
how much information can be stored in each memory store research would suggest that capacity of STM is 5-9 items + capacity of LTM is potentially unlimited
research on capacity JOSEPH JACOBS: STM procedure (A01)
technique to measure digit span of STM
researcher reads out 4 digits Ps then attempts to recall these digits in correct order out loud- if correct research then reads out 5 digits + so on until Ps cannot recall the order correctly-determines individual’s digit span
research on capacity JACOBS: STM findings (A01)
Jacob found that mean digit span was 9.3 items- decreased to 7.3 when letters were used instead of numbers
research on capacity MILLER: STM procedure (A01)
suggested that capacity of STM is about 7-plus or minus 2
Miller also noted that people expand this capacity by chunking or grouping sets of digits or letters to units or chunks
research on capacity MILLER: STM findings (A01)
Information held in STM is in fragile state + will disappear quickly if it is not rehearsed
Maintenance rehearsal occurs when we repeat material to ourselves over + over again
Maintenance rehearsal not only keeps information in our STM but if we rehearse something long enough passes it into LTM
research on capacity: LTM (A01)
Wagenaar created diary of 2,400 events over 6 years + tested himself on recall of events rather than dates found he had excellent recall suggesting capacity of LTM is extremely large
research on capacity: individual differences (A03) (1)
P: strength of research on capacity is that effects of age are acknowledged
E + E: eg. Jacobs tested individuals of ranging ages + found that digit span increases w/age as memory becomes more complex
L: strength bc estimate of capacity of STM accounts for people of all ages
research on capacity: case studies (A03) (2)
P: weakness of research on capacity is that results are often based on case studies
E+ E: Wagenaar used his own memories in order to measure his long-term memory
L: weakness bc not only are memories not representative of general population but they are also subjective + may be difficult to apply to others
research on duration of sensory store: findings (A01)
Group1 = 42% were recalled correctly
Group 2 = 75% were recalled correctly
Sperling multiplied amount recalled by 3 + estimated that people actually saw between 9 + 10 items out of 12
duration (A01)
period of time information can last in the memory stores research would suggest that duration of STM is 18-30 seconds + duration of LTM is up to a lifetime
research on duration of sensory store SENSORY REGISTER: procedure (A01)
Sperling demonstrated very brief duration of sensory register
Ps were shown grid of numbers and words for 50 milliseconds Ps were then divided into two groups:
Group 1 – Ps were asked to recall all 12 items
Group 2 - Ps were asked to recall one row Ps heard tone that indicated which row they needed to recall
HIGH tone meant that you should recall the TOP row
MIDDLE tone indicated the middle row
LOW tone indicated the bottom row
research on duration of sensory store SENSORY REGISTER: conclusion (A01)
group 1 recall is poor as image of the items fades so rapidly that person can only report about 3 or 4 of them before remaining disappear
research on duration JOHNSON+JOHNSON: STM procedure (A01)
24 student Ps took part in 8 trials each trial student was given trigram + 3 digit number to remember trigram is meaningless three-consonant syllables
student was then asked to count backward from the 3 digit number-counting backwards was to prevent rehearsal of the trigram
each trial they were told to stop counting after different amount of time – 3, 6, 9, 12 , 15 or 18 seconds
each trial they were told to stop counting after different amount of time – 3, 6, 9, 12 , 15 or 18 seconds
research on duration JOHNSON+JOHNSON: STM findings (A01)
as retention interval increased the % of correctly recalled words decreased
research on duration JOHNSON+JOHNSON: STM conclusion (A01)
study suggests that if rehearsal is prevented STM has a very limited duration
research on duration JOHNSON+JOHNSON: LTM procedure (A01)
Bahrick at al investigated very long term memory- studied 392 Ps from Ohio, America, who were aged between 17 + 74
Ps high school yearbooks were obtained either from the Ps themselves or from their school Recall was tested in two ways:
- Photo-recognition test – name as many of the individuals as you can from 50 yearbook photos
- Free-recall test – recall all names from the individuals in yearbook without any cues
research on duration JOHNSON+JOHNSON: LTM findings (A01)
found that photo recognition was 90% accurate after 15 years + 70% accurate after 48 years
free recall was 60% accurate after 15 years + 30% accurate after 48 years-suggests that the LTM has a very long duration perhaps even longer if appropriate cues are provided
research on duration: meaningless stimuli (A03) (2)
P: weakness of research into duration is that it often makes use of artificial stimuli
E+ E: eg. Peterson & Peterson asked participants to remember nonsense trigrams
L: weakness bc stimuli lacked external validity as it did not reflect most real-life memory activities where what we are trying to remember is meaningful
research on duration: high external validity (A03) (1)
P: strength of research into duration is that some studies use meaningful memories as stimuli
E+ E: eg. Bahrick asked Ps to recall yearbook photos of people they saw + went to school w/every day
L: strength bc everyday memories were represented-suggesting that study has high external validity + results can be generalised to real-life memories
MSM model (A01)
Atkinson & Shiffrin’s multi store model was the first cognitive explanation of memory
model argues that memory is made up of three separate unitary stores
3 stores are Sensory Register, Short Term Memory and Long Term Memory
information to be retained as a memory processes of attention + rehearsal are required
sensory register (SR) (A01)
Sensory Register receives huge amount of information through 5 senses but most of it receives little or no attention and is lost
sensory register can only hold information for a very short time- if person pays attention to information-transferred to the short-term memory store
1-2 seconds
Each 5 senses has its own sensory register research into sensory memory focuses on Iconic Memory + Echoic Memory senses
short term memory (STM) (A01)
STM is for events in present or immediate past
STM codes all information acoustically that is according to sound
Visual information is transformed to its acoustic codes
capacity= 7 +-2
duration=18-30 seconds
long term memory (LTM) (A01)
memory for events that have happened in more distant past is referred to as LTM
Information is coded into LTM using semantic coding required information to be meaningful in order for it is be stored
info is stored in LTM it is stored permanently -the model, any ‘forgetting’ at this stage is because of a failure to retrieve rather than an actual loss of the information
MSM model: research support for the MSM (A03) (1)
P: strength of MSM is that it is well supported by range of research evidence
E: Glazner + Cunitz provide clear support for existence of STM + LTM as distinct memory stores
Ps heard a list of words + had to recall them immediately in any order
E: Ps had good recall for first part of the list + last part of list words in the middle of list had poorest recall
L: supports MSM as it suggests STM + LTM are distinct separate memory stores
MSM model: STM is too simplistic (A03) (2)
P: weakness of the MSM is that it is too simplistic
E: MSM states that STM is unitary store in other words there is only one type of short-term memory However evidence from people suffering from a clinical condition called amnesia show that this cannot be true eg. Shallice + Warrington studied a patient with amnesia known as KF
Although KF’s memory for verbal material was poor his memory for visual information was unaffected
E: suggests that there may be more than 1 store for STM
L: very serious limitation of the MSM because it is another research finding that cannot be explained by the model
later memory models give a more accurate depiction of STM
MSM model: rehearsal is less important (A03) (3)
P: limitation to MSM is that it overemphasises importance of rehearsal
E + E : MSM more you rehearse information more likely you are to transfer it to LTM and remember it for a long time-this is not always the case- often we able to recall information which we did not rehearse yet are unable to recall information which we have rehearsed
L: role of rehearsal as means of transferring from STM to LTM is much less important than Atkinson + Shiffrin claimed in their model
MSM model: additional supporting research (A03) (4)
P: strength supported by scientific, brain scanning evidence
E + E: eg. Beardsley found pre-frontal cortex-active during STM tasks but not LTM tasks
Squire used brain scanning + found that hippocampus was active when LTM was engaged
STM + LTM located in different areas of brain
L: strength bc research scientifically demonstrates plausible of separate + LTM stores support the MSM
types of LTM: episodic memory (A01)
our ability to recall events from our lives- imagine this as a diary of events the following features:
‘time-stamped’ so you will know when they happened-eg. I started my new job last Saturday.
single memories which include several elements such as places, people, objects and behaviours
make a conscious effort to recall episodic memories
types of LTM (A01)
limitation of the MSM is its description of LTM as a single store psychologists now know that there are several long-term stores- is unsurprising when you consider the vast range of information we can remember in LTM
Tulving was 1 of first cognitive psychology to realise that MSM’s view of LTM was too simplistic
Tulving suggested that there are 3 LTM stores containing quite different types of information
types of LTM: procedural memory (A01)
our memory for motor actions + skills memories can be recalled without conscious awareness or effort
eg. of procedural memory are riding a bicycle, driving a car or swimming
our ability to do all of these things relies on our procedural memory
types of LTM: semantic memory (A01)
our knowledge of the world-may include facts + this memory is often likened to a dictionary or encyclopaedia eg. of semantic memories could be what different fruit tastes like, how to apply to university
memories are not ‘time-stamped’ and the memories are less personal-memory is constantly developing and being added to
types of LTM: clinical evidence (A03) (1)
P: strength of theory of types of LTM comes in clinical evidence
E: case studies of HM and Clive Wearing support view that LTM is made of 3 different stores episodic memory in both men was severely impaired as consequence of amnesia
E: but, their semantic + procedural memories were relatively unaffected eg. they understood meaning of word knew how to tie their shoelaces + in case of Clive Wearing still knew how to read music + play piano
L: supports Tulving’s view that there are different stores in LTM this is clear evidence that not only are these types of memory different but they’re stored in different parts of the brain
types of LTM: neuroimaging evidence (A03) (2)
P: strength of theory of types of long-term memory comes in evidence from neuroimaging techniques
E: eg. brain scan studies provide evidence that different types of memory are stored in different parts of the brain- Tulving et al got their Ps to perform various memory tasks while their brains were scanned using PET scanner-found that episodic + semantic memories were recalled from prefrontal cortex in brain
E: found procedural memory is linked to cerebellum which is involved in control of fine motor movement
L: objective evidence increases scientific validity of explanation for different stores in LTM
types of LTM: 3 OR 2 types of LTM?
(A03) (3)
P: Cohen and Squire disagree w/ Tulving’s division of LTM
E + E: argue that episodic + semantic memories are stored together in one store they call declarative memory-contrast procedural memories are non-declarative
L: reduces reliability of Tulving’s theory that there are three stores in LTM + suggests there are two stores instead
WMM: creation of model + duel task performance (A01)
Braddley + Hitch- said STM of MSM was too simplistic so made WMM- called slave systems
duel task performance-people able to do 1 visual task + 1 verbal task-peformance simultaneously not impaired
but when 2 visual OR 2 verbal tasks are done they are more difficult to perform
so this suggests that there is 1 store for visual processing + separate store for auditory processing
WMM: central executive (CE) (A01)
main component of WMM- decides what we pay attention to makes decisions and allocates tasks to slave systems
CE has very little no storage capacity + can only pay attention to limited number of stimuli