approaches Flashcards
Wundt’s Contribution
(A01)
Wundt founded Institute of Experimental Psychology
Wundt published one of first books on psychology helping to establish subject as an independent branch of science
description of Wundt’s approach − structuralism
use of the scientific method to study the structure of sensation + perception
use of introspection in controlled studies
use of controlled environments to establish general theories about mental processes
Wundt’s identification of higher mental processes-learning, language, emotions, etc that could not be studied in strictly controlled manner
development of field of cultural psychology based on general trends in behaviour of groups of people
Wundt introspection: procedure (A01)
- trained observers-presented w/controlled stimuli eg.ticking metronome
- Ps had to describe-stimuli-how it made them think and feel
- same stimulus
physical surroundings
instructions-given to everyone
introspection (A01)
internal events by examining your own conscious thoughts + feeling
Wundts contribution: research not scientific (A03) (1)
P: Wundt attempting scientific approach-but other psychologist eg. behaviourists criticised Wundt approach
E+E: private experiences eg. thoughts + sensations-self reported during introspection= not observable-so difficult to measure-so subjective not objective-behaviourists think Wundt Ps could be more objective + scientific-measure observable behaviour
L: weakness-undermines objectivity of Wundts work
Wundts contribution: application to cognitive processes (A03) (2)
P: although introspection-may not seem scientific-still used TODAY to gain access to COGNITIVE PROCESS
E+E: Griffths-used introspection-to study cognitive process of fruit machine gamblers + Ps where asked to think think out loud whilst playing fruit machine in microphone on their lapel
found regular gamblers= more irrational verbalisations than non-regular gamblers
L: introspection can have practical applications in MODERN SOCIETY
Wundts contribution: contribution of other psychological approaches (A03) (3)
P: Wundt’s methods have often been seen as start of cognitive psychology
E+ E: Cognitive psychology is modern-day psychological approach + it does attempt to measure what is happening in mind using scientific methods W/x Wundt some have questioned if cognitive psychology would exist today
L: strength bc Wundt’s methods have been incredibly influential to cognitive psychologists
what are the scientific methods (A01)
objective-w/x bias= making it fair
replicable=able to replicate exactly
controlled-under controlled conditions
predictable=results predict future behaviours
Wundts contribution: contribution to psychology as a science (A03) (4)
P: Wundt applied-scientific methods to studying the mind- modern day psychology=scientific discipline by many academics
E+E: if Wundt didn’t set up 1st psychology lab-study of mind would be still tied to philosophical roots-psychology might have never gained status as today-if not for Wundt
L: Wundts work paved for study of psychology as respected discipline
emergence of psychology as a science: 1900s behaviourists (A01)
Watson-behavoiurist- incorporated scientific methods-greater extent in psychology-by ensuring scientific process-used to investigate observable behaviour rather than mind
Watson focused on scientific processes-w/learning in controlled lab experiments
different viewpoint + methods-approaches= core belief of each approach ‘assumptions’ eg. behaviourist approach= behaviour is learnt-however other approaches would disagree w/assumption
emergence of psychology as a science: psychology timeline (A01)
17-19th century=psychology branched of philosophy
1879=Wundt opens 1st psychology lab
1900s= sigma feud establish-psychodynamic approach
1913= Wateson establish-behavourist approach
1950s= Rogers + Abraham develop-humanistic approach
1960s=cognitive revolution-came w/introduction of computer
Bandura proposes-social learning theory
1980s onwards=biological approach-establish as dominant force
21st century=cognitive neuroscience-emerges as distinct discipline
emergence of psychology as a science: modern psychology is scientific (A03) (1)
P: modern day psychology claims to be scientific
E+E: psychology-has same aims as natural science eg.
describe behaviour
understand behaviour
product behaviour
control behaviour
learning, biological + cognitive approach rely on use of scientific methods eg. lab studies-investigate theories in controlled + unbiased way
L: throughout 20th century + beyond-psychology has established itself as scientific discipline
emergence of psychology as a science: subjective data when studying psychology (A03) (2)
P: not all approaches use scientific + objective measures
E+E: humanistic approach rejects science + focuses on individual + subjective experiences-also studying human behaviour + Ps- most likely to have demand characteristics
L: scientific approach isn’t always possible to study human thoughts + experiences
behaviourist approach (A01)
explaining behaviour in terms of observing + learning so doesn’t consider thoughts + feelings
behaviourist approach: classical conditioning (CC) (A01)
learning by association- occurs when UCS + NS-repeated paired together
NS-produces same response- like unlearned stimulus
behaviourist approach: operant conditioning (OC) (A01)
learning is shaped by consequences eg. positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment
reinforcement-consequence of behaviour- increase behaviour being repeated- can be positive OR negative- removing the unpleasent behaviour to increase chances of being repeated
punishment: unpleasant consequences- decrease behaviour being repeated
behaviourist approach: key assumptions (A01)
- humans born on blank slate- TABULA RASA
- all behaviours learnt from environment eg. upbringing culture + society
- behaviourists are strongly on nurture side of future-nature debate
- regard genetic influences on behaviours as minimal
behaviourist approach PAVLOV: procedure (A01)
studied- digestion systems of dogs-by collecting salvia-develop (CC)-dog began to salivate before food
- before conditioning= (UCS) food–> salvation (UCR)
- before conditioning= (NS) bell–> no salvation (no CR)
- during conditioning= bell + food–> salvation (UCR)
- after conditioning= (CS) bell–> salvation (CR)
behaviourist approach: methods behaviourists use (A01)
- uses scientific approach + study things that can only be observed + measured eg. environmental + behaviour conditions
- uses controlled lab experiments-uses animals-researcher manipulates IV to see effect on DV-controlling extraneous variables
- behaviourist accept Darwin’s theory of evolution-humans have evolved from lower animals-animals replace humans as experimental subjects-behaviourist use rats, cats, pigeons to investigate how learning occurs
behaviourist approach PAVLOV: other points discovered (A01)
association-UCS + NS at same time
stimulus generalisation= animal conditioned-respond-other stimulus- similar to 1st CS
extinction=bell repeated w/no food-salvation disappears
behaviourist approach SKINNER: procedure (A01)
Skinner box-test effects of rewears on behaviour
hungry rat-in box-had lever + rat moved- accidentally knock lever
food pallet-drop into container-next to lever
few trials= rats quickly learn to pull lever to gain food
consequences of receiving food-rat repeat action again + again
behaviourist approach LITTLE ALBERT: findings (A01)
Albert now afraid of rat even when loud noise stopped
behaviourist approach LITTLE ALBERT: procedure (A01)
procedure- 9 months Albert- presented w/white rat + reaction noted
Albert present w/white rat again-but w/loud noise-repeated many times
white rat=infront of Albert + absence of loud noise
behaviourist approach LITTLE ALBERT: conclusion (A01)
even when loud noise stopped fear conditioned in young child + 5 days later Albert generalised little white objects as rat- animal= now AFRAID
behaviourist approach: positive reinforcement (A01)
receive reward-when positive behaviour performed
eg. lever pressing behaviour of rats in box-positively reinforced w/food pallets
behaviourist approach: negative reinforcement (A01)
avoid something unpleasant
behaviourist approach: punishment (A01)
designed to weaken OR eliminate
behaviourist approach research methods: no demand characteristics (A03) (2)
P: no demand characteristics-using non human Ps there won’t be possibility that they will work out aim of study
E+E: skinners study-although rats are quite an intelligent species there is no possibilities they would have been able to work out aim of study
L: strength-will not be unrealistically nice to please researcher nor will they go opposite way + demonstrate behaviour purposefully invalidate results-making behaviourist approach more valid
behaviourist approach research methods: ethical issues (A03) (4)
P: ethical issues-using animals in research raised ethical issues-animals often kept hungry + thirsty in order to motivates them in experimental procedures
E+E: in 1 version of skinners box study rats were electrocuted-cause physical harm
L: weakness-research should follow animal ethical code of conduct-where an animal should not be physically harmed during an experiment
behaviourist approach research methods: lack of generalisation (A03) (3)
P: lack of generalisation-most experiments used to support behaviourists approach are carried out on animals
E+E: pavlov used dogs as his sample-humans + dogs can’t be matched similarly on DNA unlike chimp w/98.4% match
L: weakness-questionable whether we can apply findings to humans-reduces validity of method + whole behaviourist approach-researchers give animals human characteristics called-anthropomorphism
behaviourist approach research methods: lab studies (A03) (1)
P: high control over variables-bc behaviourist approach uses lab studies-have such tight control over IV + extraneous variables-so clearly look at how stimulus lead to response when researching behaviour
E+E: in skinners study all variables were kept same apart form type of reinforcement
L: strength bc-cause + effect relationship between IV-type of reinforcement + DV-response of ear can be established
behaviourist approach: deterministic (A03) (1)
P: behaviourist approach accused of being deterministic- view of human behaviour
E+E: behaviourist approach sees all behaviour being controlled by past experience-that are conditioned-skinner suggest everything we do is sum total of our reinforcement history-skinner said any sense of free will is an ‘illusion’ + our past conditioning history controls our behaviour
L: weakness-approach suggest people are not responsible for their behaviour -if our past experiences control our behaviour-we can’t choose how to behave-if someone behaves immoral approach suggests its not their fault
behaviourist approach: application (A03) (4)
P: principles of conditioning applied to range of real-world behaviours + problems
E+E: OC-basis of token economy systems-successfully in institution- eg. token economies used in prison + psychiatric wards-work by rewarding appropriate behaviour w/tokens-exchanged for privileges
CC led to development of treatment for reduction of anxiety associated w/phobias-systematic desensitisation therapy on CC- eliminating learned anxious response w/feared object + replacing w/relaxation
L: strength bc of token economies is that they have been very successful in treating + correcting prisoners’ behaviour - systematic desensitisation has very high success rate of treating phobic patients shows that conditioning can be used in real-life
behaviourist approach: reductionist (A03) (2)
P: behaviourist approach accused of being reductionist-view of human behaviour
E+E: behaviourist approach reduce all complex behaviour down to conditioning
L: simplistic view of behaviour to think we only learn through positive OR negative reinforcement-approach ignores other contributions eg. role of cognitive processes of neurochemistry perhaps take electric approach
behaviourist approach: evidence (A03) (3)
P: research carried by Watson + Rayner supports behaviourist approach
E+E: Watson + Rayner discovered little Albert had no response when presented w/white rat-they presented white rat w/loud bag-after several pairings-Little Albert began crying by presence of white rat alone-Little Albert learnt through CC-associated loud bang as UCS w/white rat-conditioned stimulus causing conditioned response of fear
L: strength bc adds validity + credibility to behaviourist approach
SLT approach: methods SLT psychologists use (A01)
SLT shares w/ behaviourism-commitment to scientific method + has mostly employed lab experiments to investigate observations learning-lab experiment when research manipulates IV + record effect on DV
SLT approach: key assumptions (A01)
much of behaviour is learnt through conditioning-we also learn through observation + imitation-SLT suggests that learning occurs indirectly- we observe consequences of other peoples behaviour
SLT approach: imitation (A01)
SLT say people learn by observing what other people say + do-more likely to observe + imitate some people rather than anyone-ROLE MODEL
SLT approach: modelling (A01)
someone must 1st cary out behaviour or attitude to be learned-individual that performs role=model
live model-parent OR teacher OR member of peer group
symbolic model-someone portrayed in media eg. actress-models provide eg. of behaviour that can be observed by individual + later reproduced by imitating them
SLT approach: identification (A01)
extent which an individual relates to model + wants to be like them-more likely to happen if individual feels like they are similar
eg. same sex-in order to identify w/ model-observer must feel they would be likely to experience same outcome in that situation -if an individual identify w/model means they are more likely to imitate their behaviour
SLT approach: vicarious reinforcement (A01)
reinforcement-not directly experienced but occurs through observing someone else being reinforced
individual who observes model being rewarded for certain behaviour is more likely to imitate that behaviour as they want same reward
can observe consequences experienced by model + then make judgements as to likelihood of experiencing theses outcomes themselves
SLT approach: meditational processes (A01)
LEARNING BEHAVIOUR:
attention-observer must pay attention + observe behaviour-they must notice + pay attention to behaviour being modelled
retention-observer must remember behaviour seen-behaviour may be noticed but not always remembered
PERFORMING BEHAVIOUR:
reproduction- observer must be capable of reproducing behaviour they saw eg. must be physically capable of imitating behaviour-a 90 year old woman watching dancing on ice-she may really enjoy moves shown but she won’t attempt them as she’s not physically capable
motivation-rewards + punishment that follow behaviour will be considered by observer-if possible rewears greater than cost-behaviour will be more like imitated by observer
SLT approach BOBO DOLL: findings (A01)
GROUP 1: showed high levels of aggression in their play
GROUP 2: showed low levels of aggression in their play
GROUP 3: showed medium levels of aggression in their play
SLT approach BOBO DOLL: procedure (A01)
children aged 2-6 watched film of adult punching + shouting aggressively at bob doll-children divided into 3 groups viewing different ending:
GROUP 1: adult was rewarded w/sweets for aggressive behaviour
GROUP 2: adult was punished for their aggressive behaviour
GROUP 3: acted as control group + didn’t see end of film
children the placed in room w/various toys including Bobo doll + was observed
SLT approach research methods: standardised procedure (A03) (2)
P: Lab studies adopt standardised procedure + so can be replicated
E+ E: eg. Bandura’s study was standardised which meant that - repeat procedure exactly again + again to test impact of observation on imitation of aggressive behaviour
L: strength bc it is possible to check if findings are reliable
SLT approach BOBO DOLL: conclusion (A01)
study supports idea of vicarious learning-children learnt from watching consequences of adults aggressive behaviour
SLT approach research methods: high control variables (A03) (1)
P: lab studies have tight control over variables + eliminate extraneous variables
E+ E: eg. Banduras study all variables were kept same e.g. seeing same adult hit doll
L: strength bc it means that cause + effect relationship between IV + DV can be established
SLT approach research methods: lack of generlisabilty (A03) (3)
P: Lab experiments are carried out in artificial settings w/artificial scenarios
E+ E: Bandura’s study it isn’t an everyday situation that child sees an adult being aggressive to an inflatable doll
L: weakness bc it is questionable whether we can apply findings to real life/everyday behaviour it might not represent how children observe + imitate aggression in everyday life- lacks ecological validity
SLT approach research methods: demand characteristics (A03) (4)
P: human Ps there may be possibility that they work out aim of study
E +E: eg. Bandura’s study children were 3-8yrs of age there is possibility that older children may have worked out aim of study + shown either please you/ screw you behaviour
L: weakness bc if this happens they may attempt to ‘please’ experimenter + demonstrate behaviour they think experimenter wants or they may go opposite way “screw you” + try to demonstrate behaviour that is opposite of what
experimenter wants- Demand characteristics reduce internal validity of research