Psychological Models- Lecture One- condense this Flashcards
Pros of classifying MDs
helps determine clinical features
systemises diagnosis
shared understandings
Cons of classifying MDs
stigmatises
pigeon holing
natural vs constructed categories
Biological model
MD is due to physical+// chemical changes/ deficits in the brain +// body
Pros of the biological model
researches heritability
role of NTs
efficacy of some biological Rx
Cons of the biological model
biological Rx =/= biological cause
problem situated in patient’s body
passive patient
relapse
Behavioural model
symptoms/ behaviours= main features
learning theory= origin/ persistence of MD
Types of learning
Classical conditioning (association) Operant conditioning (consequences) Modelling (copying)
Behavioural pros
scientific, clear concepts, effective Rx (for ADs)
Behavioural cons
symptom substitution, therapies= crude/ mechanistic, poor explanatory model, mental processes
Cognitive model
world view= determined by thinking (cognition), which influences symptoms, behaviours and attitudes
dysfunctional cognition causes MDs
change in MD linked to change in cognition
Cognitive pros
clear concepts, scientific, effective Rx (esp. when combined with behavioural elements)
Cognitive cons
poor explanatory model, changed thinking =/= changed behaviour, individualistic
Psychodynamic model
focuses on pattern of feelings, we're unaware of many influential feelings imbalance in (usually normal) feelings, inconsistencies and irrationalities unconscious processes= influential in all relationships and are expressed in symbols (eg dreams)
Transference
important feelings manifest as emotional reactions to the therapist
Counter-transference
therapist’s reactions to the patient (just as important)
try to be objective/ non-judgemental
Psychodynamic pros
enduring contribution, emphasis on childhood experiences, idea of unconscious influencing behaviour
Psychodynamic cons
not objective/ scientific, relies on anecdotal evidence, findings based on small group of middle class Viennese, power of therapist, insight into problems =/= resolution
Social model
MD triggered by life events that appear to be independent of the disorder
precipitants= class, job, social role
patients often remain disordered due to societal influences
Social pros
attention to role of society/ traumatic events
Social cons
how can a therapist treat social issues?
Integrated model
several levels of functioning
MD can affect multiple levels/ change
one model links to one function
successful Rx dictated by appropriate level’s recommended management
multi-disciplinary approaches
can be used alongside stress-vulnerability model
Stress-vulnerability model at what levels?
biological, cognitive +// emotional
T+S Biological
antidepressants (psychiatrist)
T+S Behavioural
rewarding outgoing social behaviour (clinical psychologist)
T+S Cognitive
encourage functional thinking (clinical psychologist)
T+S Psychodynamic
facilitate exploration of feelings (psychotherapist)
T+S Social
provide support/ care (social worker)
Limitations of familial resemblances approach
appearance may mislead, observers differ, actor vs observer
4Ds of abnormality
vague/ subjective criteria
deviance, distress, dysfunction, danger (exception, rather than rule= Stuber 2014)
Rosenthal effect
experimenter isn’t blinded and subconsciously gives it away
Analogue experiments
lab-induced behaviour that resembles real-life abnormal behaviour- test these as a proxy
eg learned helplessness (Seligman)
Corpus callosum
connects hemispheres