psychological debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

nature

A

the idea that our behaviour is due to biological processes such as:
- genetic inheritance
- brain processes
- biochemistry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

strengths of nature debate

A
  • could be useful if it helps us to develop biological solutions to psychological issues (e.g drug therapies)
  • resistant to ethnocentric bias, as biological factors affect everyone in the same way
  • deterministic as it suggests that biological processes cause behaviour which gives us a usefulness cause and effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

weaknesses of nature debate

A
  • limited usefulness as it may be impossible to change a person’s nature
  • may be socially sensitive, as it may lead to ideas of genetic superiority
  • may be socially sensitive, as it is deterministic, so people stop taking responsibility for their behaviour
    e.g eugenics movement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

nurture

A

our behaviour is due to how we have been brought up and the influences of others over our lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

strengths of the nurture debate

A
  • can be useful as it may help to change a child’s behaviour by changing the way they are brought up
  • deterministic as it suggests upbringing causes behaviour which gives us a useful cause and effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

weakness of nurture debate

A
  • reductionist as it misses out the role of nature
  • ethnocentric as cultures vary in how children are brought up
  • socially sensitive = leads to parents being blamed for societies problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

free will

A

the idea we have control over how we behave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

strengths of the free will debate

A
  • accounts for individual differences and values human behaviour
  • good face validity as it appears to match with our everyday experience of living as we experience making free choices every day
  • lacks social sensitivity as it fits with the idea of personal responsibility for our actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

weaknesses of the free will debate

A
  • lacks usefulness, as ideas cannot be studied in a scientific, systematic way
  • socially sensitive, if people are blamed for actions beyond their control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

determinism

A

our behaviour is due to either internal or external forces that we have no control over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

strengths of determinism

A
  • deterministic principles can be studied using a scientific, systematic way
  • predictable, ‘cause and effect’ relationships allow scientists to develop practical applications
    e.g developing drug therapies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weaknesses of determinism

A
  • lacks usefulness, as it prevents people from taking responsibility for their own actions, may be seen as an excuse from personal responsibility e.g in the legal system
  • lacks face validity as we experience making choices every day
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

holism

A

our behaviour is due to several factors interacting together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

strengths of holism

A
  • increases the validity, the influence of many factors is more reflective of real life compared to consuming there is one cause for behaviour
  • considers cultural differences, therefore decreases ethnocentrism and increases the validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

weakness of holism

A
  • reduces usefulness in the real world, as it fails to identify any single cause for human behaviour
  • lacks usefulness, it is often difficult to study lots of explanations at once, meaning you gather little data on lots of explanations = lacks in depth explanations (lacks validity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

reductionism

A

our behaviour can be explained using a single level of explanation

17
Q

strengths of reductionism

A
  • useful, as it can help us understand complex behaviour (validity)
  • often forms the basis of scientific research, gives psychology greater credibility, placing it in equal terms with natural sciences
18
Q

weakness of reductionism

A
  • oversimplifies complex behaviour = reducing validity and findings
  • lacks usefulness as it gives us a limited understanding of complex behaviour (not holistic, reducing validity)
19
Q

individual explanation

A

the idea that our behaviour is due to internal, individual factors (particularly our personality or characteristics)

20
Q

situational explanation

A

our behaviour is due to the wider context of the environment (the circumstances of the situation) we find ourselves in

21
Q

strengths of individual explanation

A
  • deterministic as it suggests that internal factors are responsible for behaviour, allows us to conclude cause and effect (validity) and therefore supports psychology as a science
  • can lead to useful practical applications, as insights from individual behaviour can be applied in clinical psychology
22
Q

weaknesses of individual explanation

A
23
Q

strengths of situational explanation

A
24
Q

weaknesses of situational explanation

A
25
Q

socially sensitive research

A

studies that have the potential to have a negative impact on specific groups of people within society
results are problematic

26
Q

strengths of socially sensitive research

A
  • carrying out socially sensitive research, usually means the researcher develops a personal relationship with participants, so we can often gain useful, insightful data, increasing the validity of the research
  • building an understanding of these sensitive issues, can allow useful applications by finding out information that would not usually be accessible
27
Q

weaknesses of social sensitive research

A
  • building relationships when carrying out socially sensitive research can open issues with bias and subjectivity = reducing validity
  • interviewing participants about sensitive topics may induce painful emotions and memories, and therefore cause psychological harm = unethical
  • results may lead to discrimination of vulnerable groups
28
Q

3x features of science

A
  • falsifiability : via hypothesis testing, in order to determine cause and effect
  • objectivity : free from personal bias/opinion, based on facts
  • replicability : via standardised procedures
29
Q

‘psychology as a science’ strengths

A
  • increases the scientific status = increases the credibility of psychology as a science via falsification (challenge the notion of psychology being a pseudoscience)
  • falsifiability, objectivity = increases validity = accuracy
  • replicability = increases reliability = consistency
30
Q

‘psychology as a science’ strengths

A
  • increases the scientific status = increases the credibility of psychology as a science via falsification (challenge the notion of psychology being a pseudoscience)
  • falsifiability, objectivity = increases validity = accuracy
  • replicability = increases reliability = consistency
31
Q

‘psychology as a science’ weaknesses

A

can reduce ecological validity when testing and measuring behaviour under highly controlled environments (not reflective of real-life behaviour)

32
Q

ethical considerations

A

can ethical guidelines prevent worthwhile research from taking place? is it possible that the benefits of the study can outweigh the problems with how the participants are treated? is it ever justifiable to conduct research that breathes ethical guidelines?
NOT MISTAKEN FOR SOCIALLY SENSITIVE

33
Q

what ethical considerations do we have to take into consideration

A
  • respect : informed consent, right to withdraw, confidentiality
  • responsibility : protection from harm, debriefing
  • integrity : deception, observational research
  • competence : justification of actions
34
Q

strengths of ethical considerations

A
  • enhances the reputation of psychology as an academic discipline = increasing the funding of future research = making it more likely to happen
  • researchers are likely to attract and recruit participants for psychological research due to having a good reputation
35
Q

weaknesses of ethical considerations

A
  • can reduce the validity if participants know the aim of the study = leading to demand characteristics
  • unethical research can damage the reputation of psychology, this can affect future fundings and participants
  • it can place limits on the sort of research that can be carried out
  • sampling bias, if participants are able to withdraw, sample may lack generalisability
36
Q

usefulness of psychological research, 2 ways it can be useful?

A

theoretically : adds to psychological knowledge?
practically : helps us to develop useful applications? useful treatments?

37
Q

why is research useful?

A
  • when it adds to psychological knowledge
  • when it leads to practical applications or the development of useful treatments
  • when it is reliable
  • when it is valid
  • when it is ethical, and avoids psychological harm
  • when it is unethical, and increases validity
38
Q

when does research lack usefulness?

A
  • when it doesn’t add to psychological knowledge
  • when it doesn’t lead to practical applications, when it doesn’t lead to the development of effective treatments
  • when it lacks reliability
  • when it lacks validity
  • when it is ethical and lacks validity as participants can guess the aim of the study
  • when it is unethical and causes psychological harm to participants