psych 315 - M2 Flashcards

1
Q

History of Intelligence Testing

A
  • Alfred Binet
    • public education just started – wanted to identify students who needed more support
    • wanted to find children who needed extra support (did not focus on the “why”)
  • Louis Terman
    • brought intelligence testing from France to North America
    • started seeing intelligence as heritable (from genetics)
    • adapted into Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common IQ Tests

A
  • Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test
    • mean score of 100
    • 1 general score from intelligence quotient
    • different questions for different ages
    • issue: some questions needed to know certian facts
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)
    • had general score and 5 composite scores
    • wanted a test for adults as well
    • wanted test that was less linguistic-based and school-based (Binet focused too much on language, verbal abilities and facts from formal schooling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Different Theories of Intelligence

A
  • General Intelligence: intelligence is one underlying ability – can be split into sub-abilities but contribute overall to your general intelligence
    • crystallized intelligence: factual knowledge
    • fluid intelligence: ability to think on the spot and solve problems
  • Sternberg’s Theory of Successful Intelligence
    • analytical intelligence: analyze and solve problems
    • practical intelligence: street-smart
    • creative intelligence: divergent thinking (# of solutions)
  • Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
    • 7-9 types of intelligences
    • people have different strengths – and we should foster different strengths
    • not fully supported (difficult to test)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why are there individual differences in IQ?

A
  • gene environment correlations: our genes help us create environments that fit our predispositions
    • passive effect: child and parent’s shared tendency leads to environment
    • evocative effects: child’s genetic tendency cause them to evoke certain reactions from their environment
    • active effects: child’s genetic tendency cause them to actively select environments
  • genetics
    • monozygotic twins have similar intelligence levels
    • genes get stronger as we get older due to gene environment correlations
  • environment
    • school: more schooling = higher IQ scores
      • IQ scores similar with grade-peers, not age-peers
    • family environment: higher IQ for parents who provide stimulating environment / emotional responses / verbal and language communication / encouragement
    • socioeconomic status: higher SES = higher IQ
      • not static: moves with your SES
    • time period: i.e. Flynn Effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is IQ testing helpful or dangerous?

A
  • (+) predictor for job performance, health, attitudes
  • (+) tool for research and policy decisions
  • (-) eugenics background caused from IQ testing
  • (-) IQ may not actually measure intelligence: sensitive to motivation, coaching / cultural biases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Group Differences in IQ scores

A
  • girls do better in verbal (closer to average)
  • boys do better in spatial / math (closer to extreme edges)
  • white individuals score higher than black individuals
  • why?
    • culturally-biased tests
    • social differences (different experiences, background, socioeconomic)
    • stereotype threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stereotype Threat

A
  • a psychological burden caused by the concern that one’s performance might confirm a negative stereotype about one’s group
  • awareness of negative beliefs > stress response + negative thoughts (need self-regulation) + monitoring performance > impaired performance
  • cognitive load — theres only so much you can focus on
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Picho & Schmader (2018)

A
  • comparing teenager expectations on stereotypes + your own beliefs on those stereotypes
  • result: own endorsement does not matter, but researcher’s expectations on whether your demographic would do well or not matters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mindsets about Intelligence

A
  • fixed mindset (= entity theory): intelligence and talent are fixed at birth
  • growth mindset (= incremental theory): intelligence and talent can go up or down
    • predicts response to challenges and failures: more resistant, will continue trying, will choose challenging courses
    • predict academic outcomes: tend to do better academically
  • formed through individual differences, but can be induced
    • praise: you’re so good v you’re working so hard
    • interventions: giving feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do beliefs about intelligence impact academic achievement?

A
  • children with growth mindset have better academic performance
  • children from high SES: more resources → better performance
  • children from low SES: less likely to have growth mindset
    • BUT, when children low income families have growth mindset
      → good performance are even more pronounced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Claro, Paunesku, & Dweck’s (2016)

A
  • growth mindset tampers the effects of poverty on academic achievement
  • academic achievement affected by socioeconomic background and psychological factors (= beliefs about ability)
  • strong predictor of achievement: family income, growth mindset
  • students from low-income are less likely to have growth mindset
    • but those that do: acts as buffer on effects of poverty
  • done on all 10th graders in Chile through national exam
  • students with growth mindset outperform their peers at each family level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does reading require?

A
  • visual detection: detect symbols
  • understanding the language
  • symbolic understanding: understand word represents something else
  • phonological recoding: symbol-sound correspondence
  • visual-based retrieval: whole-word recognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does writing require?

A
  • visual detection: detect symbols
  • understanding the language
  • symbolic understanding: understand word represents something else
  • phonological recoding: symbol-sound correspondence
  • visual-based retrieval: whole-word recognition
  • fine motor skills
  • organizing narrative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stages of reading acquisition

A
  • stage 0: pre-reading
    • [0-3] recognize and pretend to read books
    • [3-4] know that letters have names (may know some), recognize print in environment (i.e. “stop” sign) interest in reading books
    • [5] recognize upper and lowercase letters
      • phonological awareness: ability to recognize and analyze sound structure of spoken words
        (i.e. what rhymes, what words start with same letter)
  • stage 1: grade 1-2
    • alphabetic principle: one letter corresponds to a sound (use for phonological recoding)
  • stage 2: grade 2-3
    • gains reading fluency — faster and more efficient
  • stage 3+: grade 4
    • more complex reading abilities
    • reading to learn (not learning to read anymore)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Teaching children how to read

A
  • informal: reading to children
  • formal:
    • phonics / reading for decoding
      • if only based on context, will not have skills to figure out new words in new context
    • whole-language instruction
      • expose child to interesting stories, posters, books > will acquire reading from context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Brain and Reading

A
  • visual word-form area: as we learn to read, this area starts to specialize and activate towards written words
    • forms connections with auditory and visual brain system
  • neuronal recycling hypothesis: as we acquire written language → changes how brain responds to other things
    • only so much space in your brain — language takes over what would be happening
    • responds less to faces and objects, but now responds more to written words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Dyslexia

A
  • dyslexia: reading ability is lower than expected based on IQ
  • old theory: believed to be caused by visual impairment
  • current causes:
    • genetics
    • phonological deficits
    • influence of language — more for languages with deep orthographies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Contrasting social development theories

A
  • Focus of stage
    • F: each stage has specific zone in body with strongest urge
    • E: each stage has central conflict to be resolved
  • External contexts
    • F: we are all born with powerful urges
    • E: social environment interacts to shape development
    • B: must take into account context of environment
  • Difference in stages
    • F: stages
    • E: stages
    • B: continuous
  • Effect of interactions
    • F: early interactions set up later development
    • E: how we resolve conflict impact how we develop, and goes into adulthood
    • B: development occurs within complex system of relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Freud’s Psychosexual Theory

A
  • we are all born with powerful urges
    • id: unconscious sexual and aggressive urges that drives us to behave in certain ways (part of personality)
    • ego: works to balance drive v societal expectations
    • superego: biological drives in conflict with reality and societal expectations (reality and morality aspect of personality)
  • how we resolve conflict between id, superego and ego will have continued influence in later development
  • stages:
    • each stage has specific zone in body with strongest urge
    • child has to learn to gratify urges while balancing reality and morality
    • not balancing it will have continual impact in development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Stages of Freud’s Psychosexual Theory

A
  • [0-18mo] Oral
    • id comes in as pleasure principle
    • at end of stage, ego comes in as reality principle
  • [18mo-3] Anal
  • [3-6] Phallic
    • superego comes in as morality principle
      becomes more sensitive to morality of society (right v wrong)
  • [6-12] Latency
    • drives are fairly dormant
  • [12+] Genital
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory

A
  • focused on Freud’s ego
    • argues it does more than just balance the id and superego
    • social environmental factors interact with ego to shape development to deal with expectations from society
    • ego continues to have conflicts beyond childhood - development goes beyond childhood into adulthood
  • stages of development
    • at each stage, a central conflict has to be resolved
    • how we resolve the conflict impacts how we develop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Stages of Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory

A
  • [infancy, 0-1] trust v mistrust: can i trust the world?
    • trust: parent will come help when needed
    • mistrust: not getting consistency / comfort needed → will impact relationships throughout development
  • [toddlerhood, 1-3.5] autonomy v shame/doubt: can i control my behaviours in the way society expects?
    • i.e potty training
  • [early childhood, 4-6] initiative v guilt: can i be independent from my parents?
    • if parents give space: will grow to be independent
    • if parents too involved: may develop guilt and not feel independent over behaviours
  • [middle childhood, 6-puberty] industry v inferiority: can i master skills i need to adapt?
    • mostly school-based: reading, counting, etc
  • [adolescence] identity v role confusion: who am i?
    • figuring out how to define yourself
  • [young adult] intimacy v isolation: can I fully give myself to someone else?
    • learn about intimate friendships and romantic relationships
  • [middle age] generativity v stagnation: what can i offer generations to follow?
    • tied to parenting / future generations
    • whether your work has meaning to future generations
  • [old age] integrity v despair: have I found contentment and satisfaction?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model

A
  • takes into account context: context impacts all interactions and relate with each other
  • development occurs within a complex system of relationships
  • Model:
    • the child: comes with biologically-based dispositions that actively influence development
    • microsystem: immediate environment
      (i.e. family, daycare, neighborhood)
    • mesosystem: connection between aspects of microsystem
      (i.e. relationship between mom and daycare
    • exosystem: indirect environments
      (i.e. mom’s stressful job — indirectly affects the child)
    • macrosystem: cultural values, laws, customs, resources
    • chronosystem: time period and child’s age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Freud’s Legacy

A
  • (+) first to realize importance of early experiences
  • (+) importance of early parent-child relationships
  • (+) unconscious motivations: we behave in ways we don’t know why
  • (+) led to development of other theories of development
  • (-) most ideas not supported by current research: ideas are too vague to test
  • (-) focused on adult men and on sexuality (not huge role on children)
  • (-) wrote findings while on cocaine
25
Erikson's Legacy
- (+) helps think about major themes in different stages in development - (+) highlights importance of identity in development - (+) highlights lifespan development up: does not end, but goes to adulthood - (-) specifics may not hold through: ideas are vague and difficult to test
26
Bronfenbrenner's Legacy
- (+) thinks about broad role of context beyond immediate environment - (+) thinks about influence of policies
27
Development of self-concept
- **[0-2] infancy** - has early implicit awareness - sees self as a _separate entity_ and an _active causal agent_ - i.e. rooting reflex: turn head if you stroke cheek - i.e. stare longer at videos of themselves - [~18mo] can pass rouge test — sees themselves as a unique being - [~2] recognize self in pictures, label self using name/pronouns, use category label for self (”i’m a boy”) - **[3-6] early childhood:** can describe themselves - focuses on _concrete, observable features_ (”my room is pink”) - unrealistically _positive_ (”i’m really strong”) - **[6-12] middle childhood** - begins to refer to _global characteristics:_ describes you across situations, not just within one context (i.e. “i am nice”) -- but still fairly concrete - more _realistic_ and balanced — linked to actual competencies - increased social comparisons - **adolescence** - nuanced view of self —_sense of complexity_ *(”i’m shy but also outgoing”)* - understand role of situations, context and perspectives — we can be _different in different contexts_ - more abstract and psychological (”i’m sensitive”) - begin to think about future and possible selves - begin to develop a coherent / integrated self - better understanding of self across time and place - we can be different in different contexts - characteristics: - **false self behaviour:** intentionally presents false impression to others (i.e. pretend to be cool) - **personal fable:** belief that our own experiences are unique and novel - **imaginary audience:** belief that everyone is focused on you
28
Describe research on personality developments in adolescence
- study personality using the five-factor model: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience - influenced by genetics and environments — environment becomes somewhat more important as people age - can inherit temperamental predispositions - predispositions may harden and become organized in response to the environment - many core personality traits are stable between childhood—adolescence, and adolescence—young adult - many popular stereotypes about adolescence being a time of “rebirth” - but research does not show that there is an upheaval of personality
29
Developmental changes in self-esteem
- can start measuring at age 8 - difficult to measure in early childhood - becomes more differentiated with development - self-esteem starts high → declines throughout childhood → has mixed findings during adolescence
30
Influences of self-concept
- **cognitive development:** - as our ability to think becomes more abstract, the way we see ourselves gets more complex as well - i.e. lose egocentrism = takes into account others’ feedback and is less biased - **parents:** - *warm and supportive:* child tends to have *more positive* self concepts - _family narrative:_ type of stories that families tell about child’s life (impactful, as we don’t have clear memory of own childhood) - **peers** (how they evaluate us) - **culture:** - different cultures talk about self and use descriptors differently - individualistic: focus on self and success → internal traits (”i am wonderful and a very smart person. i’m a helpful and cooperative girl”) - collectivistic: focus on role and success within group → relational and situational traits (”i’m my mom and dad’s child. i’m a hard-working child”) - Wang (2004) - Euro-American: use more private and abstract descriptors - Chinese: use more collective, public and specific descriptors
31
Influences of self-esteem
- **individual differences** - **gender:** males have higher self-esteem than females (more pronounced in industrialized societies - **race:** black > white > indigenous > asian - **approval of others:** parents, peers, teachers, etc - **societal standards:** i.e media, attractiveness, etc - physical attractiveness very strongly tied - **culture:** different cultures have different meanings of self-esteem - individual: focus on individual achievement - collective: focus on achievements and status within group - emphasizes humbleness — thinking positively about self is not ideal
32
Effect of self-esteem
- high self-esteem → better outcomes (school, well-being) - low self-esteem → emotional and behavioural problems - self-esteem movement: programs designed to boost self-esteem to boost academic performance - believed that self-esteem caused academic success - but program was not effective - maybe academic success predicts self-esteem, and so this program won’t work - maybe unearned positive enforcement does not work (have to be based in reality)
33
Erikson on identity development
- adolescence is a time of crisis of identity v role confusion (like putting together a puzzle) - current theorists see it more as a process instead of a crisis - psychosocial moratorium: time where individuals are free from excessive obligations and can experiment with different roles - classic example: university - not necessary for development, but would be easier with it
34
4 Identity States
- **identity diffusion: no exploration, no commitment** - very common in start of adolescence - only problematic if it continues for a long time - associated with high levels of behavioural and emotional problems - associated with difficulties with relationships - more likely to report _low levels of parental warmth and support_ - **identity foreclosure: no exploration, has commitment** - also very common in start of adolescence - correlated with _low anxiety and general life satisfaction_ - associated with _higher levels of prejudice_ - associated with need for _social approval_ and _lower sense of autonomy_ - more common with _controlling or overly-protective parents_ - **moratorium: has exploration, no commitment** - *next most common* — usually ages 17-19 - seen as fairly positive state, but with some links to _anxiety and conflict with authority_ - problematic if it continues for a long time - extended moratorium without commitment = anxiety - overly-thinking about who you are and how to act = rumination - **identity achievement: has exploration, has commitment** - associated with _positive outcomes_ — high achievement, maturity, intimacy - _agency:_ feels control and responsibility for one’s own actions
35
Ethnic Definitions
- **ethnic-racial identification:** how someone labels their race - [3-5] developed in childhood, seen in young children - **ethnic racial identity:** a person’s thoughts and feelings about their race and ethnicity, and the process of developing those thoughts and feelings - [adolescence] questions of identity heightened
36
Common pattern of ERI development
- **unexamined ethnic identity → exploration → resolution** [can move back and forth between exploration and resolution] - unexamined ethnic identity: childhood - have identification, but no deeper connotations about it - exploration: early adolescence - usually triggered by an experience or event → realization of “difference” - resolution - feel confidence about racial identity - how we feel about race is now incorporated in who we are
37
Different components of ERI
- **affirmation (= private regard):** how good/bad a person feels about being part of their ethnic / racial group - feel positive = protective factor → do better in emotional and mental health domains - but will be affected by other components of ERI - **public regard:** how positively a person believes other people view their ethnic/racial group - **centrality:** how important a person’s ethnic/racial group is to their identity - too much centrality can also be negative → more impacted by experiences of discrimination - **salience:** how important a person feels their ethnic/racial group is to a particular situation
38
Different Statuses of ERI with minority individuals
- **assimilated:** identify with majority, don’t identify with minority - a lot of emphasis on assimilation historically - barriers (discrimination, micro-aggressions) lead to marginalize - **bicultural:** identify with majority, identify with minority - associated with positive outcomes - in some cases, can be negative: if history is negative, identification wth majority culture can be negative - **marginalized:** don’t identify with majority, don’t identify with minority - **separated:** don’t identify with majority, identify with minority - can be more ideal for some individuals
39
ERI and outcomes
- positive ERI leads to: - lower levels of depressive symptoms - higher self-esteem - positive academic outcomes - protection in the face of discrimination (acts as buffer)
40
Influences of ERI
- **ethnic racial socialization:** where children are taught about race — typically by parents - *more common in marginalized groups* - common themes: - importance of one’s culture - dealing with racism - succeeding in mainstream society - **school:** children spend more and more time at school as they get older - _context of school_: diversity, segregation - more diversity = more positive ERI - less segregation = more positive ERI - openness: seeing race as “taboo” v openly discussing it - affinity groups of same race: opportunities to discuss shared experiences - formal curriculum: race as part of the curriculum - i.e. the identity project: intervention to boost ERI exploration - results: more ERI exploration → predicts ERI resolution - one year later: higher self esteem, lower depressive symptoms, higher grades
41
Umaña-Taylor et al.’s (2018)
- identity project: promoting adolescent's ERI exploration and resolution (8-week curriculum) - high levels of exploration predicts increase in resolution - use ethnic identity scale brief to measure ERI at T1, T2, T3 - still many factors to consider: affect on minority v majority, classroom composition, selection bias in choosing course
42
Gender Definitions
- sex assigned at birth: based on objectively measurable biological organs, hormones, chromosomes - gender / gender identity: a person’s sense of self as gendered - more psychological sense of self - how you identify, how you feel - independent from sex assigned at birth — does not have to match - gender expression: how a person demonstrates their gender - how we enact gender: masculine / feminine / androgynous - independent from gender identity — does not have to match - gender role: societal expectations of gendered behaviour / thought / trait - should have different interests, behaviours, appearance - our expectations on gender are pretty similar across cultures - boys: aggressive, competitive, assertive, risky, independent, athletic - girls: affectionate, gentle, loves children, compassionate, understanding
43
Gender across development: infancy / toddlerhood
- [3 mo] can discriminate between male and female, but focus on superficial cues - will struggle if you remove hair from females / add hair to males - [8 mo] look longer at own-gender stereotyped toys - [2 yrs] look longer at gender-inconsistent pictures (i.e. the male putting on make-up)
44
Gender across development: childhood
- changes in cognitive development shifts thinking about gender > Lawrence Kohlberg’s Theory - [2-2.5] gender identity - children can label their own gender and consistently identify their own gender - [3-4] gender stability - start to understand gender as stable across time - [5-7] gender constancy / consistency - start to understand gender is constant - across situations - across appearances - across changes of outward factors - shift from gender essentialism to understanding gender as socially-influenced - [4-5] sees gender as essentialist → will act in gender-stereotyped ways regardless of upbringing - [9] sees gender as socially-influenced - children all across development will see gender as biological essentialist - knowledge of gender stereotypes - goes from superficially based to deeper characteristics (i.e. toys, clothes → assertive v shy) - [5-7] peak of rigidity of stereotypes
45
Gender across development: adolescence
- **gender-role intensification:** heightened concern about adhering to traditional gender roles - due to puberty — changes in body (more gender differences), changes in sexual attraction - **gender-role flexibility:** allowing for traditional gender role conventions to be transcended - paradox? - gender-role intensification: more in terms of behaviour (need to fit into gender role → concerned about how to behave) - more common in early / middle adolescence - gender-role flexibility: more in terms of beliefs (focused on acceptance and letting others be flexible) - more common in later adolescence
46
Gender Differences - Physical
- conception - [prenatal] chromosomes - [1-2 mo gestation] physiological differences - [2.5-3.5 mo gestation] external genitals emerge - infancy and childhood: only few physical differences and skills (aside from genitalia) - puberty: many changes occur → capability of sexual reproduction - increase in physical growth (more pronounced in boys) - primary and secondary sex characteristics - increased sex-linked differences - boys have greater physical speed and strength
47
Gender Differences - Cognitive
- IQ tests - girls are slightly better at verbal tasks - boys are slightly better at spatial tasks - academic performance - girls have slightly better grades / performance → but there is a lot of variability depending on age and subject - beliefs / interests - actual differences are really small, but differences in beliefs tend to be much bigger - boys think they’re better at math — difference goes away with age - girls think they’re better in language arts — difference increases with age
48
Gender Differences - Emotions
- girls express more happiness and sadness - boys express more anger - girls are better at expressing, decoding and managing emotions - mental health → girls more likely to experience depression, low self-esteem
49
Gender Differences - Social Interactions
- girls more likely to emphasize intimacy and support - boys more likely to emphasize power and dominance - girls more likely to engage in indirect aggression - boys more likely to engage in direct aggression
50
Influence on gender development - Biological
- traits that are adaptive for human survival would continue to be selected - i.e. maternal care is useful for infant survival → girls more likely to play collaboratively / caring way - issue: difficult to test — more of a hypothesis - role of hormones: differences in androgen and estrogen - testosterone: higher in males, estrogen: higher in females - leads to gender differences - i.e. congenital adrenal hyperplasia: genetic female (XX) with high androgen → more likely to show traditionally male behaviour - 2 types of influences: - organizational influence: hormones influence development of characteristics - activational influence: changes in hormone levels stimulate changes in neural activation / behaviour - changes in level of hormones may lead to differences in behaviour / interests - more seen in adolescents with puberty (big changes in hormone levels) - i.e. males - higher androgen = more interest in sexual activity and aggression - difference in brain structure and function - small difference in adults, not much evidence in children
51
Influence on gender development - Social Cultural
- observation — model gender-typed behaviour - reinforcement — i.e. boys told not to cry - Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory - i.e. microsystem: parent expectations, teachers, influence of peers - i.e. exosystem: fashion industry
52
Influence on gender development - Cognitive
- Kohlberg’s Cognitive Development Theory: changes in thinking about gender → changes adherence to gender-typed behaviour - gender stability = increased rigidity - gender constancy = increased flexibility - gender schema theory - our schema on gender guide our behaviour - we remember things that fit into gender schema better (i.e. remember story better when its about male firefighter) - schema are active constructions that change over time - based on stereotypes on gender - based on personal experiences (that don’t hold true to cultural expectations)
53
Gender Identity
- sense of self as gendered that is an internal / psychological experience - transgender: one’s gender identity/expression differs from assigned sex/gender - cisgender: gender identity matches assigned sex/gender - genderqueer: individual rejects the binary categorization of gender - agender / gender-neutral: individual does not identify as any gender
54
Transgender v Cis Youth
- gender development appears similar for trans and cis youth, but trans youth and their siblings are more willing to view gender as flexible - similarities - gender development: implicit gender identity, gender preferences, gender-typed behaviour, gender stereotyping - gender essentialism: shown at at a young age - differences: - gender stability: - self-stability: gender as stable in the future, gender as unstable in the past - third-party-stability: think of gender as less stable (more flexible when thinking for third party) - gender constancy: slightly more likely to view gender as stable across contexts at age 3-5
55
Fast & Olson’s (2016)
- 3-5: socially-transitioned trans do not diff with cis on expressed gender - but, less likely to believe that - gender at birth matches current birth - other people’s gender is stable (+ their siblings too)
56
Describe research on mental health and adjustment for trans and non-binary youth
- see increased risk of mental health challenges - socially-transitioned trans youth may have better mental health outcomes than trans youth who may not be socially transitioned - socially transitioned sample is younger and higher income - socially transitioned sample may be better supported by family / environment
57
Consider what research on transgender children implies for theories/influences on gender development
- gender development appears similar in trans and cis youth - implicit gender identity → similar to cis: responds quickly to gender-positive - gender preference - gender-typed behaviour - gender stereotyping → shows that biological influences and early socialization influences cannot fully explain gender development! → even biology and socialization can still result in a different gender identity - trans youth (+ their siblings) may be more willing to view gender as flexible - shows experiences with gender do appear to impact how children think about gender - gender stability - self: stable in the future, not stable in the past - third-party: less stable — flexible in thinking for others - gender constancy: at age 3-5: more likely to see gender as stable across context
58
Consider what research on transgender children implies for theories/influences on gender development
repeated card