psych 315 - M2 Flashcards

1
Q

History of Intelligence Testing

A
  • Alfred Binet
    • public education just started – wanted to identify students who needed more support
    • wanted to find children who needed extra support (did not focus on the “why”)
  • Louis Terman
    • brought intelligence testing from France to North America
    • started seeing intelligence as heritable (from genetics)
    • adapted into Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common IQ Tests

A
  • Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test
    • mean score of 100
    • 1 general score from intelligence quotient
    • different questions for different ages
    • issue: some questions needed to know certian facts
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)
    • had general score and 5 composite scores
    • wanted a test for adults as well
    • wanted test that was less linguistic-based and school-based (Binet focused too much on language, verbal abilities and facts from formal schooling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Different Theories of Intelligence

A
  • General Intelligence: intelligence is one underlying ability – can be split into sub-abilities but contribute overall to your general intelligence
    • crystallized intelligence: factual knowledge
    • fluid intelligence: ability to think on the spot and solve problems
  • Sternberg’s Theory of Successful Intelligence
    • analytical intelligence: analyze and solve problems
    • practical intelligence: street-smart
    • creative intelligence: divergent thinking (# of solutions)
  • Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
    • 7-9 types of intelligences
    • people have different strengths – and we should foster different strengths
    • not fully supported (difficult to test)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why are there individual differences in IQ?

A
  • gene environment correlations: our genes help us create environments that fit our predispositions
    • passive effect: child and parent’s shared tendency leads to environment
    • evocative effects: child’s genetic tendency cause them to evoke certain reactions from their environment
    • active effects: child’s genetic tendency cause them to actively select environments
  • genetics
    • monozygotic twins have similar intelligence levels
    • genes get stronger as we get older due to gene environment correlations
  • environment
    • school: more schooling = higher IQ scores
      • IQ scores similar with grade-peers, not age-peers
    • family environment: higher IQ for parents who provide stimulating environment / emotional responses / verbal and language communication / encouragement
    • socioeconomic status: higher SES = higher IQ
      • not static: moves with your SES
    • time period: i.e. Flynn Effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is IQ testing helpful or dangerous?

A
  • (+) predictor for job performance, health, attitudes
  • (+) tool for research and policy decisions
  • (-) eugenics background caused from IQ testing
  • (-) IQ may not actually measure intelligence: sensitive to motivation, coaching / cultural biases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Group Differences in IQ scores

A
  • girls do better in verbal (closer to average)
  • boys do better in spatial / math (closer to extreme edges)
  • white individuals score higher than black individuals
  • why?
    • culturally-biased tests
    • social differences (different experiences, background, socioeconomic)
    • stereotype threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stereotype Threat

A
  • a psychological burden caused by the concern that one’s performance might confirm a negative stereotype about one’s group
  • awareness of negative beliefs > stress response + negative thoughts (need self-regulation) + monitoring performance > impaired performance
  • cognitive load — theres only so much you can focus on
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Picho & Schmader (2018)

A
  • comparing teenager expectations on stereotypes + your own beliefs on those stereotypes
  • result: own endorsement does not matter, but researcher’s expectations on whether your demographic would do well or not matters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mindsets about Intelligence

A
  • fixed mindset (= entity theory): intelligence and talent are fixed at birth
  • growth mindset (= incremental theory): intelligence and talent can go up or down
    • predicts response to challenges and failures: more resistant, will continue trying, will choose challenging courses
    • predict academic outcomes: tend to do better academically
  • formed through individual differences, but can be induced
    • praise: you’re so good v you’re working so hard
    • interventions: giving feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do beliefs about intelligence impact academic achievement?

A
  • children with growth mindset have better academic performance
  • children from high SES: more resources → better performance
  • children from low SES: less likely to have growth mindset
    • BUT, when children low income families have growth mindset
      → good performance are even more pronounced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Claro, Paunesku, & Dweck’s (2016)

A
  • growth mindset tampers the effects of poverty on academic achievement
  • academic achievement affected by socioeconomic background and psychological factors (= beliefs about ability)
  • strong predictor of achievement: family income, growth mindset
  • students from low-income are less likely to have growth mindset
    • but those that do: acts as buffer on effects of poverty
  • done on all 10th graders in Chile through national exam
  • students with growth mindset outperform their peers at each family level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does reading require?

A
  • visual detection: detect symbols
  • understanding the language
  • symbolic understanding: understand word represents something else
  • phonological recoding: symbol-sound correspondence
  • visual-based retrieval: whole-word recognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does writing require?

A
  • visual detection: detect symbols
  • understanding the language
  • symbolic understanding: understand word represents something else
  • phonological recoding: symbol-sound correspondence
  • visual-based retrieval: whole-word recognition
  • fine motor skills
  • organizing narrative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stages of reading acquisition

A
  • stage 0: pre-reading
    • [0-3] recognize and pretend to read books
    • [3-4] know that letters have names (may know some), recognize print in environment (i.e. “stop” sign) interest in reading books
    • [5] recognize upper and lowercase letters
      • phonological awareness: ability to recognize and analyze sound structure of spoken words
        (i.e. what rhymes, what words start with same letter)
  • stage 1: grade 1-2
    • alphabetic principle: one letter corresponds to a sound (use for phonological recoding)
  • stage 2: grade 2-3
    • gains reading fluency — faster and more efficient
  • stage 3+: grade 4
    • more complex reading abilities
    • reading to learn (not learning to read anymore)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Teaching children how to read

A
  • informal: reading to children
  • formal:
    • phonics / reading for decoding
      • if only based on context, will not have skills to figure out new words in new context
    • whole-language instruction
      • expose child to interesting stories, posters, books > will acquire reading from context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Brain and Reading

A
  • visual word-form area: as we learn to read, this area starts to specialize and activate towards written words
    • forms connections with auditory and visual brain system
  • neuronal recycling hypothesis: as we acquire written language → changes how brain responds to other things
    • only so much space in your brain — language takes over what would be happening
    • responds less to faces and objects, but now responds more to written words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Dyslexia

A
  • dyslexia: reading ability is lower than expected based on IQ
  • old theory: believed to be caused by visual impairment
  • current causes:
    • genetics
    • phonological deficits
    • influence of language — more for languages with deep orthographies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Contrasting social development theories

A
  • Focus of stage
    • F: each stage has specific zone in body with strongest urge
    • E: each stage has central conflict to be resolved
  • External contexts
    • F: we are all born with powerful urges
    • E: social environment interacts to shape development
    • B: must take into account context of environment
  • Difference in stages
    • F: stages
    • E: stages
    • B: continuous
  • Effect of interactions
    • F: early interactions set up later development
    • E: how we resolve conflict impact how we develop, and goes into adulthood
    • B: development occurs within complex system of relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Freud’s Psychosexual Theory

A
  • we are all born with powerful urges
    • id: unconscious sexual and aggressive urges that drives us to behave in certain ways (part of personality)
    • ego: works to balance drive v societal expectations
    • superego: biological drives in conflict with reality and societal expectations (reality and morality aspect of personality)
  • how we resolve conflict between id, superego and ego will have continued influence in later development
  • stages:
    • each stage has specific zone in body with strongest urge
    • child has to learn to gratify urges while balancing reality and morality
    • not balancing it will have continual impact in development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Stages of Freud’s Psychosexual Theory

A
  • [0-18mo] Oral
    • id comes in as pleasure principle
    • at end of stage, ego comes in as reality principle
  • [18mo-3] Anal
  • [3-6] Phallic
    • superego comes in as morality principle
      becomes more sensitive to morality of society (right v wrong)
  • [6-12] Latency
    • drives are fairly dormant
  • [12+] Genital
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory

A
  • focused on Freud’s ego
    • argues it does more than just balance the id and superego
    • social environmental factors interact with ego to shape development to deal with expectations from society
    • ego continues to have conflicts beyond childhood - development goes beyond childhood into adulthood
  • stages of development
    • at each stage, a central conflict has to be resolved
    • how we resolve the conflict impacts how we develop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Stages of Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory

A
  • [infancy, 0-1] trust v mistrust: can i trust the world?
    • trust: parent will come help when needed
    • mistrust: not getting consistency / comfort needed → will impact relationships throughout development
  • [toddlerhood, 1-3.5] autonomy v shame/doubt: can i control my behaviours in the way society expects?
    • i.e potty training
  • [early childhood, 4-6] initiative v guilt: can i be independent from my parents?
    • if parents give space: will grow to be independent
    • if parents too involved: may develop guilt and not feel independent over behaviours
  • [middle childhood, 6-puberty] industry v inferiority: can i master skills i need to adapt?
    • mostly school-based: reading, counting, etc
  • [adolescence] identity v role confusion: who am i?
    • figuring out how to define yourself
  • [young adult] intimacy v isolation: can I fully give myself to someone else?
    • learn about intimate friendships and romantic relationships
  • [middle age] generativity v stagnation: what can i offer generations to follow?
    • tied to parenting / future generations
    • whether your work has meaning to future generations
  • [old age] integrity v despair: have I found contentment and satisfaction?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model

A
  • takes into account context: context impacts all interactions and relate with each other
  • development occurs within a complex system of relationships
  • Model:
    • the child: comes with biologically-based dispositions that actively influence development
    • microsystem: immediate environment
      (i.e. family, daycare, neighborhood)
    • mesosystem: connection between aspects of microsystem
      (i.e. relationship between mom and daycare
    • exosystem: indirect environments
      (i.e. mom’s stressful job — indirectly affects the child)
    • macrosystem: cultural values, laws, customs, resources
    • chronosystem: time period and child’s age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Freud’s Legacy

A
  • (+) first to realize importance of early experiences
  • (+) importance of early parent-child relationships
  • (+) unconscious motivations: we behave in ways we don’t know why
  • (+) led to development of other theories of development
  • (-) most ideas not supported by current research: ideas are too vague to test
  • (-) focused on adult men and on sexuality (not huge role on children)
  • (-) wrote findings while on cocaine
25
Q

Erikson’s Legacy

A
  • (+) helps think about major themes in different stages in development
  • (+) highlights importance of identity in development
  • (+) highlights lifespan development up: does not end, but goes to adulthood
  • (-) specifics may not hold through: ideas are vague and difficult to test
26
Q

Bronfenbrenner’s Legacy

A
  • (+) thinks about broad role of context beyond immediate environment
  • (+) thinks about influence of policies
27
Q

Development of self-concept

A
  • [0-2] infancy
    • has early implicit awareness
    • sees self as a separate entity and an active causal agent
      • i.e. rooting reflex: turn head if you stroke cheek
      • i.e. stare longer at videos of themselves
    • [~18mo] can pass rouge test — sees themselves as a unique being
    • [~2] recognize self in pictures, label self using name/pronouns, use category label for self (”i’m a boy”)
  • [3-6] early childhood: can describe themselves
    • focuses on concrete, observable features (”my room is pink”)
    • unrealistically positive (”i’m really strong”)
  • [6-12] middle childhood
    • begins to refer to global characteristics: describes you across situations, not just within one context
      (i.e. “i am nice”) – but still fairly concrete
    • more realistic and balanced — linked to actual competencies
    • increased social comparisons
  • adolescence
    • nuanced view of self —sense of complexity (”i’m shy but also outgoing”)
    • understand role of situations, context and perspectives — we can be different in different contexts
    • more abstract and psychological (”i’m sensitive”)
    • begin to think about future and possible selves
    • begin to develop a coherent / integrated self
    • better understanding of self across time and place
    • we can be different in different contexts
    • characteristics:
      • false self behaviour: intentionally presents false impression to others (i.e. pretend to be cool)
      • personal fable: belief that our own experiences are unique and novel
      • imaginary audience: belief that everyone is focused on you
28
Q

Describe research on personality developments in adolescence

A
  • study personality using the five-factor model: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience
  • influenced by genetics and environments — environment becomes somewhat more important as people age
    • can inherit temperamental predispositions
    • predispositions may harden and become organized in response to the environment
  • many core personality traits are stable between childhood—adolescence, and adolescence—young adult
    • many popular stereotypes about adolescence being a time of “rebirth”
    • but research does not show that there is an upheaval of personality
29
Q

Developmental changes in self-esteem

A
  • can start measuring at age 8
    • difficult to measure in early childhood
    • becomes more differentiated with development
  • self-esteem starts high → declines throughout childhood → has mixed findings during adolescence
30
Q

Influences of self-concept

A
  • cognitive development:
    • as our ability to think becomes more abstract, the way we see ourselves gets more complex as well
    • i.e. lose egocentrism = takes into account others’ feedback and is less biased
  • parents:
    • warm and supportive: child tends to have more positive self concepts
    • family narrative: type of stories that families tell about child’s life (impactful, as we don’t have clear memory of own childhood)
  • peers (how they evaluate us)
  • culture:
    • different cultures talk about self and use descriptors differently
      • individualistic: focus on self and success → internal traits (”i am wonderful and a very smart person. i’m a helpful and cooperative girl”)
      • collectivistic: focus on role and success within group → relational and situational traits (”i’m my mom and dad’s child. i’m a hard-working child”)
  • Wang (2004)
    • Euro-American: use more private and abstract descriptors
    • Chinese: use more collective, public and specific descriptors
31
Q

Influences of self-esteem

A
  • individual differences
  • gender: males have higher self-esteem than females
    (more pronounced in industrialized societies
  • race: black > white > indigenous > asian
  • approval of others: parents, peers, teachers, etc
  • societal standards: i.e media, attractiveness, etc
    • physical attractiveness very strongly tied
  • culture: different cultures have different meanings of self-esteem
    • individual: focus on individual achievement
    • collective: focus on achievements and status within group
      • emphasizes humbleness — thinking positively about self is not ideal
32
Q

Effect of self-esteem

A
  • high self-esteem → better outcomes (school, well-being)
  • low self-esteem → emotional and behavioural problems
  • self-esteem movement: programs designed to boost self-esteem to boost academic performance
    • believed that self-esteem caused academic success
    • but program was not effective
      • maybe academic success predicts self-esteem, and so this program won’t work
      • maybe unearned positive enforcement does not work (have to be based in reality)
33
Q

Erikson on identity development

A
  • adolescence is a time of crisis of identity v role confusion (like putting together a puzzle)
  • current theorists see it more as a process instead of a crisis
  • psychosocial moratorium: time where individuals are free from excessive obligations and can experiment with different roles
    • classic example: university
    • not necessary for development, but would be easier with it
34
Q

4 Identity States

A
  • identity diffusion: no exploration, no commitment
    • very common in start of adolescence
    • only problematic if it continues for a long time
      • associated with high levels of behavioural and emotional problems
      • associated with difficulties with relationships
      • more likely to report low levels of parental warmth and support
  • identity foreclosure: no exploration, has commitment
    • also very common in start of adolescence
      • correlated with low anxiety and general life satisfaction
      • associated with higher levels of prejudice
      • associated with need for social approval and lower sense of autonomy
      • more common with controlling or overly-protective parents
  • moratorium: has exploration, no commitment
    • next most common — usually ages 17-19
    • seen as fairly positive state, but with some links to anxiety and conflict with authority
    • problematic if it continues for a long time
      • extended moratorium without commitment = anxiety
      • overly-thinking about who you are and how to act = rumination
  • identity achievement: has exploration, has commitment
    • associated with positive outcomes — high achievement, maturity, intimacy
    • agency: feels control and responsibility for one’s own actions
35
Q

Ethnic Definitions

A
  • ethnic-racial identification: how someone labels their race
    • [3-5] developed in childhood, seen in young children
  • ethnic racial identity: a person’s thoughts and feelings about their race and ethnicity, and the process of developing those thoughts and feelings
    • [adolescence] questions of identity heightened
36
Q

Common pattern of ERI development

A
  • unexamined ethnic identity → exploration → resolution
    [can move back and forth between exploration and resolution]
    • unexamined ethnic identity: childhood
      • have identification, but no deeper connotations about it
    • exploration: early adolescence
      • usually triggered by an experience or event
        → realization of “difference”
    • resolution
      • feel confidence about racial identity
        • how we feel about race is now incorporated in who we are
37
Q

Different components of ERI

A
  • affirmation (= private regard): how good/bad a person feels about being part of their ethnic / racial group
    • feel positive = protective factor
      → do better in emotional and mental health domains
      • but will be affected by other components of ERI
  • public regard: how positively a person believes other people view their ethnic/racial group
  • centrality: how important a person’s ethnic/racial group is to their identity
    • too much centrality can also be negative → more impacted by experiences of discrimination
  • salience: how important a person feels their ethnic/racial group is to a particular situation
38
Q

Different Statuses of ERI with minority individuals

A
  • assimilated: identify with majority, don’t identify with minority
    • a lot of emphasis on assimilation historically
    • barriers (discrimination, micro-aggressions) lead to marginalize
  • bicultural: identify with majority, identify with minority
    • associated with positive outcomes
    • in some cases, can be negative: if history is negative, identification wth majority culture can be negative
  • marginalized: don’t identify with majority, don’t identify with minority
  • separated: don’t identify with majority, identify with minority
    • can be more ideal for some individuals
39
Q

ERI and outcomes

A
  • positive ERI leads to:
    • lower levels of depressive symptoms
    • higher self-esteem
    • positive academic outcomes
    • protection in the face of discrimination (acts as buffer)
40
Q

Influences of ERI

A
  • ethnic racial socialization: where children are taught about race — typically by parents
    • more common in marginalized groups
    • common themes:
      • importance of one’s culture
      • dealing with racism
      • succeeding in mainstream society
  • school: children spend more and more time at school as they get older
    • context of school: diversity, segregation
      • more diversity = more positive ERI
      • less segregation = more positive ERI
    • openness: seeing race as “taboo” v openly discussing it
    • affinity groups of same race: opportunities to discuss shared experiences
    • formal curriculum: race as part of the curriculum
      • i.e. the identity project: intervention to boost ERI exploration
      • results: more ERI exploration → predicts ERI resolution
        • one year later: higher self esteem, lower depressive symptoms, higher grades
41
Q

Umaña-Taylor et al.’s (2018)

A
  • identity project: promoting adolescent’s ERI exploration and resolution (8-week curriculum)
  • high levels of exploration predicts increase in resolution
  • use ethnic identity scale brief to measure ERI at T1, T2, T3
  • still many factors to consider: affect on minority v majority, classroom composition, selection bias in choosing course
42
Q

Gender Definitions

A
  • sex assigned at birth: based on objectively measurable biological organs, hormones, chromosomes
  • gender / gender identity: a person’s sense of self as gendered
    • more psychological sense of self
    • how you identify, how you feel
    • independent from sex assigned at birth — does not have to match
  • gender expression: how a person demonstrates their gender
    • how we enact gender: masculine / feminine / androgynous
    • independent from gender identity — does not have to match
  • gender role: societal expectations of gendered behaviour / thought / trait
    • should have different interests, behaviours, appearance
    • our expectations on gender are pretty similar across cultures
      • boys: aggressive, competitive, assertive, risky, independent, athletic
      • girls: affectionate, gentle, loves children, compassionate, understanding
43
Q

Gender across development: infancy / toddlerhood

A
  • [3 mo] can discriminate between male and female, but focus on superficial cues
    • will struggle if you remove hair from females / add hair to males
  • [8 mo] look longer at own-gender stereotyped toys
  • [2 yrs] look longer at gender-inconsistent pictures
    (i.e. the male putting on make-up)
44
Q

Gender across development: childhood

A
  • changes in cognitive development shifts thinking about gender > Lawrence Kohlberg’s Theory
    • [2-2.5] gender identity
      • children can label their own gender and consistently identify their own gender
    • [3-4] gender stability
      • start to understand gender as stable across time
    • [5-7] gender constancy / consistency
      • start to understand gender is constant
        • across situations
        • across appearances
        • across changes of outward factors
  • shift from gender essentialism to understanding gender as socially-influenced
    • [4-5] sees gender as essentialist
      → will act in gender-stereotyped ways regardless of upbringing
    • [9] sees gender as socially-influenced
    • children all across development will see gender as biological essentialist
  • knowledge of gender stereotypes
    • goes from superficially based to deeper characteristics
      (i.e. toys, clothes → assertive v shy)
      • [5-7] peak of rigidity of stereotypes
45
Q

Gender across development: adolescence

A
  • gender-role intensification: heightened concern about adhering to traditional gender roles
    • due to puberty — changes in body (more gender differences), changes in sexual attraction
  • gender-role flexibility: allowing for traditional gender role conventions to be transcended
  • paradox?
    • gender-role intensification: more in terms of behaviour
      (need to fit into gender role → concerned about how to behave)
      • more common in early / middle adolescence
    • gender-role flexibility: more in terms of beliefs
      (focused on acceptance and letting others be flexible)
      • more common in later adolescence
46
Q

Gender Differences - Physical

A
  • conception
    • [prenatal] chromosomes
    • [1-2 mo gestation] physiological differences
    • [2.5-3.5 mo gestation] external genitals emerge
  • infancy and childhood: only few physical differences and skills (aside from genitalia)
  • puberty: many changes occur → capability of sexual reproduction
    • increase in physical growth (more pronounced in boys)
    • primary and secondary sex characteristics
    • increased sex-linked differences
      • boys have greater physical speed and strength
47
Q

Gender Differences - Cognitive

A
  • IQ tests
    • girls are slightly better at verbal tasks
    • boys are slightly better at spatial tasks
  • academic performance
    • girls have slightly better grades / performance→ but there is a lot of variability depending on age and subject
  • beliefs / interests
    • actual differences are really small, but differences in beliefs tend to be much bigger
      • boys think they’re better at math — difference goes away with age
      • girls think they’re better in language arts — difference increases with age
48
Q

Gender Differences - Emotions

A
  • girls express more happiness and sadness
  • boys express more anger
  • girls are better at expressing, decoding and managing emotions
  • mental health → girls more likely to experience depression, low self-esteem
49
Q

Gender Differences - Social Interactions

A
  • girls more likely to emphasize intimacy and support
  • boys more likely to emphasize power and dominance
  • girls more likely to engage in indirect aggression
  • boys more likely to engage in direct aggression
50
Q

Influence on gender development - Biological

A
  • traits that are adaptive for human survival would continue to be selected
    • i.e. maternal care is useful for infant survival
      → girls more likely to play collaboratively / caring way
    • issue: difficult to test — more of a hypothesis
  • role of hormones: differences in androgen and estrogen
    • testosterone: higher in males, estrogen: higher in females
    • leads to gender differences
      • i.e. congenital adrenal hyperplasia: genetic female (XX) with high androgen → more likely to show traditionally male behaviour
    • 2 types of influences:
      • organizational influence: hormones influence development of characteristics
      • activational influence: changes in hormone levels stimulate changes in neural activation / behaviour
        • changes in level of hormones may lead to differences in behaviour / interests
          • more seen in adolescents with puberty (big changes in hormone levels)
          • i.e. males - higher androgen = more interest in sexual activity and aggression
  • difference in brain structure and function
    • small difference in adults, not much evidence in children
51
Q

Influence on gender development - Social Cultural

A
  • observation — model gender-typed behaviour
  • reinforcement — i.e. boys told not to cry
  • Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory
    • i.e. microsystem: parent expectations, teachers, influence of peers
    • i.e. exosystem: fashion industry
52
Q

Influence on gender development - Cognitive

A
  • Kohlberg’s Cognitive Development Theory: changes in thinking about gender → changes adherence to gender-typed behaviour
    • gender stability = increased rigidity
    • gender constancy = increased flexibility
  • gender schema theory
    • our schema on gender guide our behaviour
    • we remember things that fit into gender schema better
      (i.e. remember story better when its about male firefighter)
    • schema are active constructions that change over time
      • based on stereotypes on gender
      • based on personal experiences (that don’t hold true to cultural expectations)
53
Q

Gender Identity

A
  • sense of self as gendered that is an internal / psychological experience
    • transgender: one’s gender identity/expression differs from assigned sex/gender
    • cisgender: gender identity matches assigned sex/gender
    • genderqueer: individual rejects the binary categorization of gender
    • agender / gender-neutral: individual does not identify as any gender
54
Q

Transgender v Cis Youth

A
  • gender development appears similar for trans and cis youth, but trans youth and their siblings are more willing to view gender as flexible
  • similarities
    • gender development: implicit gender identity, gender preferences, gender-typed behaviour, gender stereotyping
    • gender essentialism: shown at at a young age
  • differences:
    • gender stability:
      • self-stability: gender as stable in the future, gender as unstable in the past
      • third-party-stability: think of gender as less stable (more flexible when thinking for third party)
    • gender constancy: slightly more likely to view gender as stable across contexts at age 3-5
55
Q

Fast & Olson’s (2016)

A
  • 3-5: socially-transitioned trans do not diff with cis on expressed gender
  • but, less likely to believe that
    • gender at birth matches current birth
    • other people’s gender is stable (+ their siblings too)
56
Q

Describe research on mental health and adjustment for trans and non-binary youth

A
  • see increased risk of mental health challenges
  • socially-transitioned trans youth may have better mental health outcomes than trans youth who may not be socially transitioned
    • socially transitioned sample is younger and higher income
    • socially transitioned sample may be better supported by family / environment
57
Q

Consider what research on transgender children implies for theories/influences on gender development

A
  • gender development appears similar in trans and cis youth
    • implicit gender identity → similar to cis: responds quickly to gender-positive
    • gender preference
    • gender-typed behaviour
    • gender stereotyping
    → shows that biological influences and early socialization influences cannot fully explain gender development!→ even biology and socialization can still result in a different gender identity
  • trans youth (+ their siblings) may be more willing to view gender as flexible
    • shows experiences with gender do appear to impact how children think about gender
    • gender stability
      • self: stable in the future, not stable in the past
      • third-party: less stable — flexible in thinking for others
    • gender constancy: at age 3-5: more likely to see gender as stable across context
58
Q

Consider what research on transgender children implies for theories/influences on gender development

A

repeated card