psych 307 - M1 Flashcards
What is Cultural Psychology
- culture is rooted in our everyday lives and influences everything we do
- there is racism within cultural psychology: not the same recognition for all
- psychological processes are shaped by experiences
Kroeber & Kluckhohn (1952)’s definitions of culture
- historical
- descriptive
- normative
- structural
- psychological
Historical definition of “culture”
Culture is the total social heredity of mankind, while as a specific term, a culture means a particular strain of social heredity
- i.e. Across Chinese history, cloth X is used for…
Descriptive definition of “culture”
Culture is all social activities in the broadest sense: language, marriage, property system, art, etc
- purely descriptive, laundry list of things people do
Normative definition of “culture”
Culture is all standardized social procedures and customs, passed on socially, that form people’s way of life
- step further from descriptive definition – adds social consequence part
- i.e. Younger people are expected to bow (desc), and will be reprimanded of not (normative)
Structural definition of “culture”
Culture is a system or organization of interdependent values common to specific social groups, forming a pattern unique to each society
- behaviour is related to structural variables: desire for sanitation, desire for purity, etc
Psychological definition of “culture”
Culture consists of all results of human-learned effort at adjustment
- step further from structural definition
- the things we do allow us to adapt to environment
Textbook definition of “culture”
Any kind of information acquired from other members of one’s species through social learning that can affect one’s behaviours
Group of individuals existing in some shared context
Issues with defining culture
- cultural boundaries are fuzzy, not clearly defined
- constantly changing and emerging
- within-culture v between-culture
- difficult to say 2 groups are different when there are so many differences within 1 group
- caused by variability among individuals of same culture
- culture reflects average tendencies within groups, but have enormous degree of individual variation
- difficult to say 2 groups are different when there are so many differences within 1 group
Key Figures: General v Cultural Psychology
- Wilhelm Wundt
- studied low-level processes – emphasized need for experimental control
- studied high-level processes: volkerpsychologie – we need less controls to fully understand high-level cultural processes - John B Watson
- focused on behaviourism – anything unseen is outside realm of psychology
- cognitive revolution (= we have thoughts and feelings and mental processes)
- human brains are the same everywhere – focused on universal topics - Richard Shweder
- the mind and environment mutually constitute each other
- thinking is not universal, but involves interaction with its context
- cannot consider the mind and culture as separate
Levels of universality
- Non-universal: cognitive tools are not found in all cultures, only exist in certain environments (i.e. abacus)
- Existential universal: exists to serve different functions in different contexts (i.e. criticism)
- Functional universal: serves the same function in all cultures, but presented in different degrees (i.e. prosocial punishment)
- Accessibility universal: exists everywhere with the same purpose and extent (i.e. social facilitation)
Culturally universal v culturally variable
- culturally universal: more general things (i.e. math, create facial expressions)
- culturally variable: more specific things (i.e. derivatives, some expressions have meaning while others don’t)
- however, difficult to determine which is which – lack sufficient data (most data is WEIRD)
- i.e. things initially considered universal: Figure-Line task, Müller-Lyer Illusion
Caution about culture
- people from different places are not “fundamentally different” – more differences within than across groups
- cultural is not something we are born with, but something we learn to have
- culture is not biological, and cultural differences are not necessarily biological differences
- some behaviour can be caused by varying alleles, but should not be biological reductionistic
Different approaches to culture
-
colour-blind approach: emphasize similarities and ignore cultural differences
- may become unaware of pre-existing cultural biases
- created due to minimal group paradigm
- even smallest thing can cause discrimination
-
multi-cultural approach: appreciate and recognize differences
- fares better in society: more positive attitudes, reduced negative emotions, more trust and comfort within companies
Majority v Minority in cultural approaches
-
Majority prefers colour-blindness
- feels that multicultural messages exclude them
- leads to dislike of minorities with strong ethnic identities- if initially high in prejudice, multiculturalism leads to worse interactions
-
Minority prefers multiculturalism
- greater ethnic identification and less perception of threat
- taxing to downplay or hide identity under colour-blind approach
Ethnocentrism
Judging people from other cultures by the standards of one’s own culture
- our values are shaped by our cultural experiences
- socialized to think certain things are good and moral v bad
Cultural Psychology v Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Sim: both deal with cultural processes
- Diff: in scope – cross-cultural compares across numerous cultures
Cultural Psychology v Sociology
- Sim: relationship betw cultural environment and one’s mental processes and behaviour
- Diff: heavier use of qualitative measures, focus on large abstract societal structures
Cultural Psychology v Multicultural Psychology
- Sim: studying how culture affects psychology at individual and social levels
- Diff: focus on how people from different backgrounds interact with each other within one context
Berry’s Ecocultural Model
- background variables > (biological and cultural adaptation) > process variables > psychological variables
- background variables: ecological and sociopolitical context
- process variables: ecological influence, genetic transmission, cultural transmission, acculturation
- psychological variables: observable behaviour and inferred characteristics
Types of cultural transmission
-
Vertical transmission: parents teaching cultural information to their children
- primary form for small-scale societies
- results in a lot of modelling behaviour: learn by watching, not much explicit teaching
- Horizontal transmission: passing on of cultural information between peers
- Oblique transmission: passing on cultural information from an older generation to a younger generation
What type of cultural transmission is most common?
- Hunter gatherer societies: fair proportion of vertical, horizontal and oblique transmission
- Industrialized societies: lots of horizontal and oblique transmission
- has vertical transmission when younger, but increasingly less now
- oblique transmission comes very early on (daycare, media figures)
Cognitive capacities that facilitate cultural transmission
- Language: to convey ideas
- Theory of mind: understand that others have differing mental states = imitative learning (v emulative learning)
- Sharing experiences and goals: allows for cultural and instructed learning (collaboration and scaffolding)
Tomasello, Kruger and Ratner (2003): Theory of Cultural Learning
- [0-9 mo] primary focus is on object = emulative learning
- [9 mo - 4 years] sees others as “intentional agents” with independent intentions = imitative learning
- [4-6 years] sees others as “mental agents” with wrong thoughts = instructed learning
- [6-7 years] sees others as “reflective agents” with abstracts or hypotheticals = collaborative learning
Cultural transmission in humans
- can learn cultural information much quicker than animals through individual and social learning
- have cumulative cultural complexity: information gets added on, shared by nearly every member, and are selective of who we imitate
Brain - definitions
- cephalization factor: pattern to predict what the expected brain weight should be (given body weight)
- Encephalization Quotient (EQ): actual brain weight / expected brain weight
Human Brain
- large EQ: more social species with complex social systems
- large brain has costs: requires enormous energy
= less muscle mass, smaller digestive tract
Advantage of large brain
- social brain hypothesis: complexity of social worlds require great cognitive demands = cause evolution of large brains
- when brain increases in size, usually the neocortex that gets bigger
- neocortex: sensory perception, language, consciousness, complex thoughts, problem solving
- neocortex ratio: volume of neocortex / volume of rest of the brain
- those living in larger groups tend to have larger neocortex ratios
Possible causes for large brains
- Food consumption: mental maps to find seasonal fruits
- Food extraction: needs ingenuity to get food
- Social brain: living in complex social environments = has relationship with neocortex ratio
Cumulative cultural evolution
- ratchet effect: modifications and improvements stay in the population until further changes occur
- after an idea is learned from others, it can be modified and improved = cultural information grows in complexity and usefulness
- have to understand intent to learn to make it better
- key: reliable and faithful social transmission
- modifications must be repeated accurately enough that others have solid foundation to make innovations
- requires imitative learning and communication
Muthukrishna et al: Cultural Brain Hypothesis
- group size > brain size > social learning > group size = allows for increased cultural complexity
- as group size increases, it pushes evolution for brain size to deal with larger groups
- social learning: facilitates learning from models to gain information
- key: interconnectedness