Procurement and Tendering Flashcards
Can you explain to me a two stage tendering strategy?
- First stage tender enquiry issued at RIBA Stage 2-3
- Contractor selected on quality of bid, quality of team
- Prelims price and OH/P allowance.
- Preferred contractor joins design team on pre-construction services agreement and develops project to RIBA Stage 4, then presents bid for delivering project.
What are the pros and cons of Two stage Tendering?
Pros
- Ability to overlap design and tendering / Quicker start on site
- Benefit of Contractor knowledge/builability through design
- Increase opportunity to Value / Risk management with the contractors’ input.
Cons
- Lack of competitiveness during 2nd stage
- Time/continuity implication to re-tender if second stage unsuccessful.
What is a Pre-Consruction Services Agreement?
Used between employer and contractor on two-stage tendering. Appointment follows period between first stage appointment to submission of definitive second stage tender / entry into the main contract for the Works.
Explain Single Stage Tendering?
- Competitive open tender when identical ITT issued to number of contractors who submit tender by notified date.
- Decision made on cost/quality and preferred bidder appointment made for the main works.
- Usually at RIBA Stage 4 to ensure bid most reflects the project.
What are the key advantages of single stage tendering?
- The employer benefits from a competitive tendering process which can lead to more competitive pricing
- The employer can benefit from a fixed price through this tendering process
What are the key disadvantages of single stage tendering?
- No buildability input from the contractor (at the point of tender)
- The price is only as good as the design information
- Contractors may be unwilling to tender in a good economic climate (too much competition)
What is a Negotiated Tender?
A negotiated tender is effectively a selective single-stage tender carried out between the client employer and just one contractor.
Negotiated tenders are obtained by the client, inviting one contractor of their choice to submit a tender response for the project.
What are the key advantages of negotiated tender?
- Simplicity
- Speed, a negotiated process can have programme advantages if undertaken in good faith
- The employer has flexibility in terms of choosing their preferred contractor
- Time and cost savings involved in comparing and analysing multiple tender submissions
- The process can allow early contractor involvement.
What are the key disadvantages of negotiated tender?
- Possibility of delay if contract negotiations are protracted
- Potential cost premium due to lack of competition
- There is a heavy reliance on trust between parties
- It can be seen as anti-competitive and exclusive - may put off potential other tenderers in future.
How could you justify value for money in a negotiated tender?
- Insist on an open book approach when agreeing the package
- Benchmark where necessary using BCIS/current market knowledge.
subcontract packages and a minimum of 3 quotes to be provided for each element of the works (this would need to be agreed upfront with the contractor).
What is Procurement?
- The overall act of obtaining goods and services for a construction project.
- There are several routes by which the design and construction of a building can be procured. The selected procurement route should follow a strategy which fits the project criteria and objectives.
What are the main factors that typically govern procurement route selection?
- The key is to identify the client’s objectives and key drivers in terms of time, cost and quality. Other factors such as risk allocation should also be considered.
What procurement options are you familiar with?
- Traditional procurement
- Design and build
- Management contracting
- Construction management.
What is Traditional Procurement?
- The traditional procurement route involves separating design from construction. The employer first appoints consultants to design the project in detail, contractors are then invited to submit tenders based on a fully operational scheme.
What are the key advantages? (Traditional Procurement)
- The employer retains control of the design
- The design is largely finalized before the contractors tender for the build, this means the employer knows exactly what they are getting
- All tenderers produce a submission based on the same information (tender returns easier to compare)
- Assuming the design is robust, reasonable price certainty is achieved at contract award
- Minimal built-in contractor risk premium (unlike design and build)
What are the key disadvantages? (Traditional Procurement)
- The overall project duration may be longer than design and build
- Zero or limited contractor builder input
- Design risk is retained by the employer, any changes post contract will be a variation or compensation event
- Dual point of responsibility (employer for design and contractor for construction)
When might traditional procurement be appropriate?
- The employer may have specific or detailed design requirements
- Cost certainty is important
- The shortest overall programme is not the employer’s main priority
What is Design and Build?
The contractor is responsible for completing the design and executing the construction phase of the project. This is a completely different approach to delivering a project via traditional procurement, where the client appoints consultants to undertake the design and then a contractor is appointed to construct the works.
What are the key advantages? (Design and Build)
- Single point of responsibility for design and construction (contractor)
- Earlier commencement on site is possible (if design and construction can be overlapped)
- Benefit of contractor’s experience harnessed during design (buildability input)
- Design and construction risk rest with the contractor
- Provides more cost certainty than traditional procurement
What are the key disadvantages? (Design and Build)
- The design is only as good as the employer’s requirements
- More complex to compare tender returns
- Employer changes can be difficult to value and expensive
- the employer may have less control over aesthetics and quality
- The contractor will build in risk premiums into their tender returns
When might design and build be appropriate?
- Where there is need to make an early start on site (D&B has the potential to overlap design and construction)
- Where the employer wishes to minimize their risk profile
- For technically complex projects, the design will benefit from the contractor’s buildability input.
- Where retaining control of the design is not the priority
What additional insurances might be needed under a D&B contract?
The contractor and their design team will have design responsibility, therefore, it is likely additional professional indemnity insurance (PII) will be required.
What are employer’s requirements (ERs)?
The expression employer’s requirements is used to describe the document(s) produced by the employer to set out its requirements in relation to the project and this is what the design and construction of the works will be based on.
What are contractors proposals (CPs)?
CP takes precedence if conflict with ERs
- CPs are prepared by the contractor which responds to the employer’s requirements.
- In this document(s), the contractor will set out a more detailed design (based on the employer’s requirements), which will require further development throughout the course of the project.