Processing Affect 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the history of literature on infants affective capacities?

A

Little known about human infant’s affective capacities until the 1970s & 1980s = recognised
Intersubjective basis of attachment by Bowlby (1969) and Ainsworth (1978)

Long time = theorised that empathy has a role in development (Darwin, 1871). It is an emotional bridge between organism + the environment (Freud, 1938).

Idea that infants are socially sensitive = Infant sensory apparatus = highly receptive to stimuli from social world (i.e., social fittedness; MacFarlane, 1975) + Experience-expectant (Narvaez et al., 2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is affective communication?

A

Trevathen (1974) = 2-3mths babies. Mothers spoke with the children and videoed the interactions. Infants were leading the conversations = mothers were reacting to baby’s rhythm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are babies good at affective communication?

A

pre-equipped for dyadic co-ordinated interaction (Feldman & Eidelman, 2007) Babies = primed for social interaction.

Some level of contingency is likely to precede birth (Feldman, 2007) = synchrony of the heartbeats of the mother and child

Cross-cultural phenomenon (Borstein et al., 2015) = generalisability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many modes of interactions do babies have in affective communication? (trevathen, 1974)

A

2

Mode 1 = object
Mode 2 = people (more lively, significant)

Different modes = diff. interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the importance of studies looking affective communication?

A

Emphasises the importance of synchrony and resonance. Identifies it happens very early on.

Suggests it might be the basis of communication bc non-verbal communication evidence shows a foundation for later skills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the parent socially fitted to communicate w/ their infant?

A

Parenting with a caregiving network = occurs unconsciously caused by plasticity in parent brain. This made prominent when a person become a parent.

Increase in empathy in the parental brain = good for synchrony + resonance

Adults reward centre (nucleus accumbens) becomes highly sensitive to stimuli from their infant = crying sound is a highly salient motivational signal + increase activity in the brain to act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is intersubjectivity?

A

Infant’s ability to engage in dyadic, affectively charged exchanges and interactions with other people (i.e., “proto-conversations”; Trevarthen, 1979)

When two people connect and interact - effective communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do children learn how to self-regulate?

A

dyadic relationship = learn how to regulate

learn how to self-regulate through the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

True or false

Synchrony can only be seen in humans

A

False - can be seen in animals e.g dolphins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is synchrony?

A

When connecting with a person = a shift in state of consciousness. From single to dyadic state of consciousness.

An overarching process that co-ordinates the
ongoing exchanges of sensory, hormonal, and
physiological stimuli between parent and child
social interactions…” (Feldman, 2007, p. 340)

motor activity
body sensation
emotion
cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in Paladino et al. (2010)

A

P = sitting in front of the screen + research is brushed face. Another person on the screen is being brushed in/out of synchrony w/ their face being brushed.

Findings:
When in synchrony, P feels similar/ close emotionally/ physically to the person on the screen. ‘like me’ effect.

Did it w/ babies = hours after birth like synchrony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in Cirelli et al. (2014)?

A

Shows when synchrony w/ adult = more prosocial and likely to help them

No asynchronouns = no help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are relational fields?

A

attraction
splitting
re-forming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is reparation?

A

mismatch of meanings/ intentions
messiness = breaks in connections

Can parents have the ability to bring back the synchrony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the importance of reparation?

A

Can change a slightly fearful state into security = important to build other qualities e.g trust/ resilience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does research show about synchrony involving breaks and rests?

A

Synchrony = element of chaos + unpredictability (messiness)

Best functioning mother-infant dyads =
in synchrony ~28-34% of the time
(Harris & Waugh, 2002)

17
Q

Is messiness in relationships important?

A

Breaks are important and need to be sensitively supported bc individual needs to get out of connectivness but can increase states of fear shown through heart rate (e.g Haley et al., 2003)

18
Q

What are the different qualities of fear?

A

Sympathetic ANS = high energy intersubjective field of psychobiological attainment, rupture and interactive repair

Parasympathetic ANS = low energy intersubjective field of psychobiological attainment, rupture and interactive repair (deeper, profound fear)

19
Q

Name evidence about the repair of mistakes (messiness)

A

Repair of mistakes in face-to-face interactions with infants occurs= 3-5s (Tronick & Cohn, 1989)

Delay in interactive repair by the parent is linked to infant cortisol reactivity (Müller et al., 2015) = Self-comforting is positively related to cortisol reactivity = ineffective in making them secure.

– Maternal touch can lower an infant’s heart rate during arousal (Calkins & Hall, 2007)
– Parent engagement and infant expectations (Kogan & Carter, 1996)

20
Q

Why is co-regulation important?

A

Critical in child-caregiver = dyads given long term development of neural system
– Neocortical regions can alter limbic activity (Hariri et al., 2000)
– Immaturity is likely to heighten children’s
vulnerability to environmental influences. prefrontal cortex = regulate the amygdala and limbic system.

21
Q

What happened in Gee et al.’s study (2014) and how does it show co-regulation is important?

A

Children = presented w/ pictures of mother/ a stranger during fMRI scanning

Results:
Lower amygdala reactivity response = own Mother’s image when the child knowns the mother is next to them
Dampening effect = strength of parent-child relationship
Adolescence = not as affected as children.

22
Q

Describe emotional regulation

A

Parent emotionally available
shared affect affects stress reactivity
infant inoculation and growth

23
Q

What is the input of development?

A

Synchrony
intimacy, trust, security
coherence

Physiology & Emotion Regulation = Feldman et al. (1999)

Attachment = Isabella et al. (1989)

Social engagement = Cirelli et al. (2014)

Symbolism = Feldman & Greenbaum (1997

24
Q

What is the input of development?

A

Physiology & Emotion Regulation = Feldman et al. (1999)

Attachment = Isabella et al. (1989)

Social engagement = Cirelli et al. (2014)

Symbolism = Feldman & Greenbaum (1997

25
Q

Why is language important in synchrony?

A

parents use language to mirror internal state = Lieberman et al., 2007)
“Oh that was scary, wasn’t it?”
“You feel the pain in the song, don’t you honey?”
“You’re tired, you’ve had a busy day!”

Understanding = Enactment & verbal communication of affective themes
– Feeling and its portrayal
– Words come to symbolise experience

26
Q

True or false?

Synchrony is a directional process of reciprocity.

A

False - Synchrony is a relational process of reciprocity + being-with = Supports brain & body
- Implicit knowledge (Tronick & Beeghly, 2011)
–Self-formation (e.g., Emde, 1983)