Problem 3 Flashcards
According to cognitive scientists, how does the mind work ?
People have mental procedures that operate on mental representations to produce thought and action
BUT: different mental pres. foster different mental procedures
ex.: calculations with 1,2,3 are different than with I,II,III
Which methods did scientists use to search for the existence of the human mind ?
- Experimentation with human participants
- Forming + testing computational models intended to be analogous to mental operations
- -> to create theoretical framework
Central hypothesis of cognitive science
Thinking can be best understood in terms of representational structures in the mind + computational procedures that operate on those structures
–> mind = computer program
Computational-representational understanding of mind
CRUM
Refers to the approach to understanding the mind based on the central hypothesis
How is a computer an analogy to thinking or using the mind according to CRUM ?
Running a program results from applying algorithms to data structures
–> just like thinking results from applying computational procedures to mental procedures
e.g.: mental representations = data structures; computational structures = algorithms
Cognitive theory
Consists of a set of representational structures + a set of processes that operate on these structures
Computational model
Interprets these structures + processes by analogy with computer programs that consists of data structures + algorithms
–> makes the cognitive theory more precise this way
Software program
Refers to the location where the computational model is implemented in a specific programming language
–> this is done to test the model
ex.: programming language like Java
Hardware platform
Refers to the location where the software program runs on
ex.: macintosh, IBM
Name the 5 complex criteria for evaluating theories of mental representation that claim to explain thought.
- Representational power
- Computational power
- Psychological plausibility
- Neurological plausibility
- Practical applicability
Representational power
How much info a particular kind of representation can express
RESULT: Logical relations are difficult to represent in connectionist NWs
Computational power
How mental representations account for 3 important kinds of high-level thinking
- Problem solving
- -> planning, decision, explanation - Learning
- Language
–> being able to learn from experience
Psychological plausibility
Requires accounting for the
a) qualitative capacities of humans
b) quantitative results of psychological experiments concerning these capacities
–> explaining the ways humans accomplish tasks
Neurological plausibility
Using neurological techniques to assess high-level cognition + when and where in the brain certain cognitive tasks are performed
e.g.: EEG
RESULT: Real brain NWs are much more complicated, thus connectionist models are only approx. to the behavior of real neurons
Practical applicability
Cognitive science should be able to increase the understanding of how students learn
–> + suggest how to teach them better
In which way is the stud of mind interdisciplinary ?
It requires the insights + the diversity of methodologies that have been gained by philosophers, psychologists etc
Connectionist research
Emphasizes the importance of connections among simple neuron like structures
–> rebound of the computational model, inspired by the brains neuronal structures
e.g.: units = neurons; degree of activation = frequency with which neurons fire