Probability, Heuristics, and Biases Flashcards

1
Q

Probability Theory

A

accepted as a normative theory of probability judgements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Axiomatic Theory

A

starts with some axioms and definitions and develops propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bayesian Updating Process:

A
  • start with hypothesis based on some prior belief that the hypothesis is true
  • observe some evidence
  • know the probability that we would observe such evidence were the hypothesis actually true
  • update our belief that the hypothesis is true based on the evidence
  • the updated belief is called posterior belief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

System 1 of brain:

A
  • Quick & automatic
  • effortless & involuntary
  • effortlessly generating impressions & feelings that are sources for beliefs & choices of system 2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

System 2:

A
  • involves effort
  • conscious
  • has beliefs from system 1, makes choices
  • decides what to think about and do
  • responsible for concentration on a problem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

System 1 & System 2 together

A
  • active when awake
  • system 1 - automatic,
  • system 2 - low effort mode
  • system 1 generates input for system 2 (impressions, intuitions, intentions, feelings)
  • when system 1 cannot find an answer it calls on system 2
  • division of labour between the two systems is highly efficient, but system 1 can make systematic mistakes (biases);
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which system can make systematic mistakes (biases)

A

System 1 - it may use heuristics to estimate probabilities or make decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Heuristics

A

Rule of Thumb e.g. choose the 2nd cheapest bottle of wine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Representativeness heuristic

A

estimate the probability that an outcome was a result of a given process based on how representative you think the outcome is of that process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Gambler’s Fallacy

A

belief that after long sequence of red, “black is now due”, failure to understand independence of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Insensitivity to Sample Size

A

with a smaller sample size, extreme outcomes are more likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conjunction Fallacy:

A

A and B is a conjunction
overestimating the probability of a conjunction
- people mistakenly believe that the probability of two events happening together is greater than the probability of one of those events happening alone (either A or B).
overall probability in conjunctive event lower than in any elementary event
This violates a basic rule of probability.
The rule is:
Pr (A + B) </ Pr (A) and
Pr (A + B) </ Pr (B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disjunction Fallacy:

A

A or B is a disjunction
underestimate probability of disjunction
Probability of an elementary event serves as an anchor; insufficient adjustment from anchor
- people mistakenly judge the probability of a disjunction to be less likely than one of its components occurring.
Overall probability in disjunctive event is higher than in any elementary event
This violates a basic rule of probability.
The rule is:
Pr (A or B) >/ Pr(A) and Pr (A or B) >/ Pr (B) (The probability of the union of the two events (A or B) is at least as likely as the occurrence of just event (A) alone).
Why is this important?
- Used in risk assessment such as insurance or in disaster planning (prob that at least one catastrophic event will happen in a given period, e.g., probability that there will be flooding or an earthquake or a storm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When updating beliefs, Bayes rule requires us to take into account what 3 things?

A

the base rate, the evidence, and the conditional probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is base rate neglect?

A

Base rate neglect refers to estimating a too high posterior by not correctly taking the base rate, the evidence, and the conditional probabilities into account
- could be explained using the availability heuristic: some information may be more available than other information
- relevant in medical diagnosis e.g. mammograms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anchoring and adjustment heuristic

A

pick an initial estimate and adjust up or down to come up with final answer; insufficient adjustment leads to answers that are affected by anchors (even when anchors are irrelevant)

17
Q

Availability Heuristic

A

makes you assess the probability of an event based on how easily it comes to mind
- assess probability based on accessibility

18
Q

Affect heuristic

A

Assigns probability to consequences based on how you feel about them; feel good - higher probability; feel bad - lower probability

19
Q

Availability Heuristic Pro

A

Pro: Allows people to make quick and efficient decisions based on information they have recalled
Instances of large classes recalled faster than instances of small classes

20
Q

Availability Heuristic Con

A

Con: Biases can arise because availability can be affected by factors other than probability
- it can lead to irrational fears, and over and underestimation of risk

21
Q

Availability Heuristic Biases arise due to:

A
  • Retrievability - salience and familiarity makes instances more retrievable (e.g. I know a woman astronaut so I overestimate proportion of astronauts who are women)
  • Effectiveness of a search net - Biased search procedures (e.g., frequency of word door versus love)
  • Imaginability - (e.g. calculate risk of expedition by imagining contingencies)
  • Illusory correlation - strengthened for events which frequently co-occur
22
Q

When does System 2 overwrite the intuitive response of system 1?

A
  • sometimes not correcting may be due to not noticing
  • making statistical nature of problem salient being aware of System 1 think may help for some
  • But: System 1 decision serves as anchor, corrective adjustment may be insufficient
  • Impacted by various factors, e.g., time pressure, multi-tasking, good mood, contrary to biological clock
23
Q

What is the goal of Bayesian updating? Explain in one sentence.

A

Normative rule of how to update probabilistic beliefs in the face of new evidence

24
Q

Let H stand for hypothesis and E for evidence. Which probability are we looking for when applying Bayesian updating? Explain in one sentence.

A

Prior probability Pr(H) is your probabilistic belief that H is true before you get any evidence.
When we are updating beliefs we are looking for the posterior probability that H is true given the evidence E, i.e. for Pr(H|E)

25
Q

Write Bayes formula, be careful to define each term

A

Pr (H|E) = Pr (E|H) X Pr (H) / Pr (E|H) x Pr(H) + Pr (E| not H) x Pr (not H)
Pr (not H) - prior probability that hypothesis is not true
Pr (E|H) - probability of observing the evidence conditional on the hypothesis being true
Pr (E| not H) - probability of observing the evidence on the hypothesis being true
Pr (E) - total probability of observing the evidence

26
Q

What does the base rate fallacy refer to? How can it be explained?

A

Base rate fallacy is the tendency to estimate a too high probability by not taking the base rate into account i.e., by ignoring a very low base rate (PRIOR).
The probability Pr(E|H) serves as an anchor and an individual who fails to estimate the probability Pr (H|E) fails to adjust their beliefs downwards from the anchor and to take the base rate into account

27
Q

Give an example where the base rate fallacy may be relevant?

A

Medical screening, military reconnaissance

28
Q

What is the Rule of total probability?

A

it is the denominator of Bayes Rule
- Pr(E) = Pr(E|H) x Pr(H) + Pr(E| not H) x Pr (not H)

29
Q

What can be explained by the use of representativeness heuristic?

A

The Gambler’s Fallacy

30
Q

What are adjustment and anchoring heuristic biases?

A
  • Insufficient adjustment
  • Overestimating probability of conjunctive events
  • Underestimating probability of disjunctive events
31
Q

When does System 2 overwrite the intuitive response of system 1?

A
  • not correcting may be due to not noticing
  • making statistical nature of problem salient & being aware of the existence of System 1 thinking may help for some
  • But: System 1 decision serves as anchor; corrective adjustment may be insufficient
  • Impacted by various factors, e.g.: time pressure, multi-tasking, good mood, contrary to biological clock
32
Q

What is the role of System 1 and the role of System 2 in Kahneman and Tversky’s Dual System Theory?

A

System 1: Quick & automatic; no effort & no sense of voluntary control; effortlessly generating impressions & feelings that are source for beliefs & choices of System 2
System 2: Mental activities that involve effect; conscious, reasoning, has beliefs; make choices; decides what to think about and what to do; responsible for concentration on a problem

33
Q

Why do people use heuristics?

A

Heuristics are helpful as they help us make quick decisions
The decision are “correct” much of the time

34
Q

How do heuristics work?

A
  • Generic heuristic process of attribute substitution
  • Essence of attribute substitution
  • person using heuristic may be answering a different question than the one they are being asked
    Example: instead of question “How likely is this airplane crash?”, the individual may be answering the question, “How easily can I imagine this airplane crashing?”