Nudges and Behavioural Public Policy 2 Flashcards
Default option example
- make automatic enrolment in to pensions default
- make organ donations default with opt-out option
Why do default options work?
- people have a tendency to do nothing - inertia
- status quo bias
- important part of the choice architecture as a large number of people will end up with the default
- can be strengthened through suggestion that this is recommended option
What are examples of Frames?
- If you use energy conservation methods, you will save $350 per year
- If you do not use energy conservation methods, you will lose $350 per year
The second framing could be more effective due to loss aversion (if an individual losses x, they suffer a greater loss in value than the increase in value they experience if they gain x)
How does faming work?
It is often System 1 (automatic) that makes decisions rather than system 2 (reflective) which would conclude that the outcome of the two options is the same
Example of use of Social Norms
Poster: most of Gallatin County’s Young Adults (89%) Don’t Drink and Drive
Letter: x% of your neighbours pay their taxes
News: x% of adults are vaccinated
Why do social norms work?
- people have a tendency to conform & follow the herd (sometimes based on thinking that others have more information than them; sometimes simply herding; sometimes thinking that others are paying more attention to them than they actually are)
What does it mean to prime?
to influence subtly in order to increase ease at which certain information comes to mind
Study: asking about intention to vote the day before election increases probability of voting by 25 percent
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - What are some objections to nudges?
- slippery slope argument - manipulation concerns
- evil nudges and bad nudges
- right to be wrong
- required choosing better than nudging (provide info & let people choose)
- neutrality preferred
- nudges not enough in some situations
- salience objection (nudges, e.g. reminders may make distort individual focus from what is important)
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - What is the slippery slope argument?
If libertarian paternalism (nudges) accepted, hard paternalism (bans) will follow
- But: what if the policies are helping people achieve what they themselves would want
- Many of the nudges intend to substitute for hard paternalism (they offer choice)
- In many case nudge is inevitable, some form of choice architecture is there
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - What is the evil nudges and bad nudges concern?
concern that choice architects constructing nudges may have their own agenda or be incompetent
- proposed solution: create rule of engagement that make it easy to monitor nudgers
- both for public and private choice architects
- increase transparency (e.g. RECAP)
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - What is the right to be wrong
- helpful to make mistakes - basis for learning
- But: Perhaps with some decisions it is difficult to learn as outcome is realized only later or decision is one-off
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - Required choosing better than nudges; better to provide info and let people choose
Yes, sometimes. But sometimes choice may be hard and options too numerous. Also, people often choose not to choose
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - Neutrality preferred
but: it is sometimes difficult to be neutral
- randomizing ballots makes sense but not randomizing assignment to insurance policies
Objections to Nudges & Potential Responses - Nudges not enough in some situations
- Yes, but in others they may be useful
- they may be seen as complements to more paternalistic policies
What is scarcity?
having less than you feel you need