Deviations from Rational Choice under Certainty Flashcards
Decision making under uncertainty
cannot assign probabilities to different possible outcomes e.g. it is difficult to estimate probabilities of different possible states of the world that could result from global warming.
Strategic Interaction
Outcome depends not only on own choice but also on other’s choice e.g. two firms competing on the market.
Preference
a relation, describing an individual’s attitudes or values over a set of alternatives.
>
is better than (strict preference relation)
> /
is at least as good as (weak preference relation)
~
is as good as (indifference)
Transitivity
Consider a set U
xRy and yRz => xRz (x, y, z) is a subset of U. Let R denote the relation “is taller than”.
Completeness
xRy or yRx, (x, y) is a subset of U. Let R denote the relation “is at least as tall as”.
Preferences of the consumer
U(x, y)
Consumer budget constraint
pxX + pyY = m
What is a rational consumer choice composed of?
Has rational preferences (transitive + complete) + utility maximization: choose most preferred item on the menu (in case of ties, one of the most preferred items)
The rational choice model also assumes:
Description and procedure invariance - different representation of the same choice problem should yield the same preferences.
Preferences are stable - do not change over time.
Insatiation - more is always better.
A consumer can evaluate any number of options and has rational preferences regardless of the number of options available.
Consumer is forward-looking & maximizes utility.
Opportunity cost of an alternative
what you have to forego if you choose this alternative
Intertemporal Labour Supply
Decisions today with consequences in multiple time periods. “rational” workers should work more when wages are high and consume more leisure when wages are low.
Sunk costs
individuals fail to ignore sunk costs i.e., individuals continue to invest in a decision because of the resources (money) already committed, even when it is no longer rational to do so.
e.g., business projects: a firm may continue funding a failing project because they have already invested heavily in it, even though discounting would minimize future losses.