Privatisation Flashcards

1
Q

what is privatisation

A

when a state run organisation or activity is sold off to the private sector

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

whats the idea behind privatisation

2 points

A

when priv sector in charge of org

ggonna run it more efficient as ogot more profit motive

more comp allowed to occur in mkt - therfore lower costs and £ and increased efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

whats a sig +ve of privatisation we forgot to talm bout

A

as gove privatise a state-owned firm, they can, over the short term, gain a considerable source of revenue that can be utilised to finance other projects.

or simply imporves their fiscal stance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

whats a -ve of increased comp

A

firms may create socia harm and ignoer cost /benefits to make profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sumup simply the idea behind privatisation

A

greater efficieny ainss through more comp and profit motives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what graph are we gonna show

A

monopoly diagram

sa intentions of priv ar eto make a mkt more comp and effiicent

we move to more comp outcomes

so put p= mc QC,Pc

As a result we get a consumer suplus fain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

whta are the 3 pros of privatisation

A

allocative efficieny

lower X inefficney

efficieny incentive whihc drives dyanmic efficicney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 3 cons of privatisation

A

limited commp can lead to prod and allcoative ineff

loss making services may be cut even if socially desirable

loss of natural monoply and loss of economies of sclae benefits such as P efficiench

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain the allocative efficiny pro

A

rivatisation icnreases allcoative efificney

as more comp means greater drive for efficiency

so frims strive to produce g/s consumers want + hgih quality g.s

good for consumers theyre satifaction increases and maximimses

get g/s they want at high Q and choices as well as higher quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain the x inefficney reduced benefit

A

this is reduced as firms need to reduce costs to remian competiive and maximise profits

can lead to lwoer prices too/ allow to amke hihger prof as tc decreasing which increases dyno eff potential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain efficiney incentive whihc drives dynamic efficney

A

due to profit motive big inenitve for firms to be as efficient as possible

can lead to dynamic efificeny gains which will occur OT

as for frms to gin advantage in higly comp mky s they may need to invest (DE

good for consumers as decrease 3 overtime + means they get better quality goods and services

increases satisfacion - whic is beneficial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the -ve of limted comp amy lead to productive and allocative inefficney

A

we make assumption as soon as gov privatise industy theyll be flock of firm entering (as lower BTE)

But more liekly to be ltd comp in the SR

as takes time for firms to set up and enter

this could lead to P and A inefificney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain why thers is P inefificney in ltd comp piitn

A

fimrs wont op on min point of AC curve as ltd comp so dont need to reduce costs and price to be comp and gain market share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain why there is A inefficient in the ltd comp argument

so why is the levle of comp significant

A

firms dont need to strive ot hit higest quality , produce where price = mc

withotu high comp we dont have incentives and no guarantee firm will flock ot industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain con of loss making services cut even if its socially desirbale

A

firms dont wanna run and provide loss makin serivces if socilly desirable

as they are profit maxers so if not gonna make a profit , not gonna provide

big problem as consumers want them= missing mkt? ask miss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain con of los making natual monopoly and loss of EOS beneifts/p efficiency

A

if before hand theere was a state run natural monopoly benefiiting from huge EOS

by opening it up to more comp you loose EOS , more firms are entering

lead to productive einefficney as AC cnat be minimised becasue

each indi firmcant produce as much so wont be able to exploit all potential EOS

lead to hgiher prices OT
or less profit = no dyno eff = no innovatino beter /cheaoer product OT

17
Q

WHAT ARE THE 3 POINTS FOR EVAL SUCCES

A

lvl of comp post privatisation

lvl of gov regulation

what is success

18
Q

lvl of comp post priv explanatino

A

if lots of firms dont enter (likely in SR) not inreased comp so we dont see incenitve and beenfits being priduced

if got ltd comp we cna see local monopolies and oligopolies and more -ve social outcomes

19
Q

how can lvl of comp post priv be overcome

A

gov reglation

+ in LT more firms lieklt to enter

if gov reg is tight we’ll see more comp outcomes and less monoply/oligopol

if weka we see existence of monp and oligop which not good

20
Q

explain eval gov reg

A

gov can refulate wehther firms forced to provide socially desirable g/s may overcome the loss making g/s arg

gov may be strict in terms of firms having to tke into acount EC/EB

21
Q

Going on from gov reg argument why wont firms take into account EC or benefits

A

they have a profit motive so ifgnoe it

due to self interest

but if gov reg increses frims may have to take em into account through tax /reg which reduces that problem

22
Q

explain eval of what is success

A

are we looking at whether gov , firms or consumers succeed

who is most important to suceed

privatisation is a gov action so ultimatley they want consumers to succeed which with slight regulation they will

more ouptu = more jobs