Prejudice Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is prejudice?

A

Unfavourable attitude towards a social group + its members” (Hogg & Vaughn, 2018)

Traditionally made of three components:
1. Cognitive = beliefs and stereotypes about a social group.

  1. Affective = strong, usually negative feelings about a social group + qualities it is believed to possess.
  2. Conative: intentions to act upon your prejudice – not behaviour itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is discrimination included in prejudice?

A

No - discrimination sometimes don’t take action in bhvr (laws can prevent discrimination)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Do all researchers support the three component view of prejudice?

A

No

Other models of prejudice = bhvrl component (discriminatory actions towards a social group) as part of prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What themes are linked to prejudice in research?

A

Prejudice = unfavourable + devaluing to the people of the group bc of their membership

Prejudice = core to intergroup inequalities, conflict, violence, exploitation e.g dehumanisation + genocide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the context of research studies?

A

The are various targets = mostly done in the West USA

Most researched types of prejudice = sexism + racism.

Theories of prejudice assume some similarities in psychological processes of different forms of prejudice,. NEEDS TO also account for differences between different types of prejudice.

Dynamics underlying sexism, racism, classism, heterosexism, ableism etc may not always be similar!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is some criticism of research on prejudice?

A

There are less interest in research in types of prejudice = different parts of the world, e.g. prejudice toward Roma people, prejudice based on sect (sectarianism) (e.g. see Bouzeineddine et al., 2022).

Prejudices in mainstream social psychology itself…
* Theories = limited if we don’t include more research on prejudice from diff. economic, cultural, social + political systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What types of prejudice is there?

A

Explicit attitudes

Implicit attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe explicit attitudes as a type of prejudice

A

Attitudes = controllable, overt, reflective and monitorable..

Measured through self-report = measures of attitudes toward a social group.

Limitation: social desirability concerns = people conceal real attitudes.

Behavioural manifestations = Hate crimes, Hate speech, Discriminatory policies and laws, Racial profiling, Police brutality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe implicit attitudes as a type of prejudice

A

Implicit attitudes = reflexive attitudes, outside conscious awareness, uncontrollable + subtle. They are inferred based on behavioral task performance.

Behavioural manifestations = Implicit hiring discrimination, Implicit glass ceiling at work, Implicit housing discrimination

E.g Women at work = law doesn’t say women can’t be in high positions, but work is organised so they can’t get to high managerial positions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can we measure implicit measures?

A

Implicit Association Tests (IAT):

Participants rapidly categorise a series of African American vs European American faces paired w/ pos. words (e.g. good)/ neg.
words (e.g. bad).

If the African American + bad task is
completed faster + w/ fewer errors vs African American + good task = shows more negative implicit attitudes toward African Americans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How would racism be measured?

A

Racism = explicit and implicit measures.

Prejudice =held at implicit but not explicit level.

Aversive racists do not hold racist beliefs at the explicit level but hold racist beliefs at the implicit level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are aversive racists?

A

Aversive racists:
- support principles of racial equality
- sympathise w/ victims of racism
- view themselves as non-prejudiced. But hold negative feelings + beliefs abt Blacks often at an unconscious level, acquired through socialization + socio-cultural influences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Name the two models that use individual differences as an explanation for prejudice

A
  1. Authoritarian personality and Right-Wing Authoritarianism
  2. Social Dominance Orientation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Name the three models that use intergroup theories as an explanation for prejudice

A
  1. Realistic Group Conflict Theory
  2. Social Identity Theory
  3. Intergroup Threats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Authoritarian personality and Right-Wing Authoritarianism explanation?

A

Historian context = WW2, racism, right-wing ideologies

Psychoanalytical approach = Authoritarian Personality (Adorno et al., 1950) created by domineering + strict parenting. Generated lots of research for 50 years.

Characterised by:
- Ethnocentrism
– Neg. attitudes = Jews, African Americans + ethnic minorities generally
– Neg. attitudes toward democracy
– Cynical + pessimistic view of human nature
– Conservative economic + political attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do you measure authoritarian personality?

A

Adorno et al. (1950) = developed the F-scale to measure tendencies e.g racism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the findings of authoritarian personality?

A

Adorno et al. (1950):

  • Prejudiced against one ethnic minority is toward others also (e.g. Blacks, Jews, Catholics)
  • Authoritarians = conservative political-economic views + exhibit high levels of generalised ethnocentrism.

Methodology = confirmation bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were the problems of Adorno et al. (1950)?

A
  • Confirmation bias = interviewers knew hypotheses + authoritarian scores of Ps
  • Agreement bias = items are designed without taking into
    account some respondents’ tendency to agree with items
    on a questionnaire regardless of content
  • Situational + sociocultural factors = signi. effect on ethnocentrism - white US Northerners are less racist than white US southerners, they have similar authoritarian scores. Culture of prejudice = sufficient for discrimination to happen.
  • ethnocentrism = happen quicker than child-rearing practises stopping the effects e.g extreme anti-semitism increased in Germany WW1 + 2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is right wing authoritarianism?

A

(RWA) = ideological orientation that varies from individual to individual. For those high in RWA:
– Social conventions = moral
– Acquiring power + authority = from following social conventions
– Q power + authority = immoral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Who researched RWA?

A

Bob Altemeyer (1988 = RWA scale to overcome previous
methodological limitations. RWA measures three
dimensions:
1. Authoritarian submission = submission to society’s
established authorities

  1. Conventionalism = adherence to social conventions adopted by existing authorities
  2. Punitiveness against deviants: support for aggression
    toward deviants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did research find about RWA?

A

It correlates w/ prejudice against gay people, immigrants, foreigners, Blacks + Jews.

Politically conservative = score more highly on RWA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is social dominance orientation?

A

All human societies organise themselves socially along group-based hierarchies
– Dom. groups = disproportionate power + special privileges (e.g. housing, health, good employment)
– Subordinate groups = little political power/ ease in their way of life (e.g. poor housing, poor health)

Who is on top + bottom = may change (e.g. through revolutions, coup d’etats etc), group-based hierarchies re-emerge.

Prejudice, discrimination + intergroup conflict = human societies’ organised in social group-based hierarchies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How does SDT explain why dom. groups maintain their power over subordinate groups?

A
  1. System-wide level processes
  2. Person level processes
  3. Intergroup level processes
24
Q

What is system-wide level processes?

A

Counterbalancing forces in all societies = push to enhance hierarchies/ reduce them:
– Hierarchy enhancing + hierarchy attenuating
social institutions
– Legitimising myths (hierarchy enhancing + hierarchy attenuating)

25
Q

How are social institutions hierarchy enhancing

A

Allocate resources disproportionately to the advantage of the dominant groups + disadvantage of subordinate
groups (sections of the criminal justice system, police, large corporations)

26
Q

How are social institutions hierarchy attenuation?

A

Allocate resources to the advantage of subordinate groups +disadvantage of dominant groups =
to restore equality (human rights + civil rights
groups and organizations)

27
Q

How are legitimising myths linked to SDT?

A

Legitimising myths = widely shared ideologies that organise + justify hierarchies (stereotypes, discourses, shared social representations etc).

– Hierarchy enhancing (HE) myths : e.g. ideas or discourse
that help justify racism, sexism, sectarianism,
classism
– Hierarchy attenuating (HA) myths : e.g. charter of
universal human rights, feminist, socialist ideas

28
Q

What does personal-level of SDT explain prejudice?

A

Aggregated indvdl acts of discrimination = maintain group-based hierarchies
– Values, personality variables, political ideologies,
temperaments, empathy, influence how discriminatory people are.
SDT focuses on a particular indvdl diff. variable =social dominance orientation.

29
Q

What is social dominance orientation?

A

A measure of a person’s orientation toward group-based hierarchies.

High SDOs prefer group-based inequalities whereas
low SDOs reject group-based inequalities.

Example of an SDO scale = Superior groups should dominate inferior groups

30
Q

What happens to people who rank high SDOs?

A

Supportive of HE legitimising myths + HE policies

31
Q

What happens to people who rank low SDOs?

A

Supportive of HA legitimising myths + HA policies

32
Q

What does research show about SDO?

A

Scales measuring SDO correlate pos. + robustly across many nations with diff. forms of prejudice toward outgroups (sexism, heterosexism, racism, nationalism) + hierarchy-enhancing policies.

SDO correlates neg. = tolerance, egalitarianism, + support for hierarchy-attenuating policies e.g respect for human
rights (e.g. Pratto, Sidanius, & Levin, 2006).

33
Q

What is the role of group status in SDT?

A

Group status = across various samples + nations, members of salient dominant groups were found to have greater SDO than members of subordinate groups.

34
Q

How are people divided into the hierarchy?

A

Assortment of people into HE + HA social
institutions and role = members of dom. groups are disproportionately found in HE roles:

– HE organization (e.g. police forces) =staffed by those high on anti-egalitarian beliefs

  • HA organizations (e.g. civil liberties organisations) = staffed w/ relatively democratic beliefs.

– Students pursuing degrees typically leading to HE
careers (e.g. business or law) = relatively anti- egalitarian views compared to those pursuing HA
careers (e.g. humanities and social sciences).

35
Q

What does Sidanious et al. (2003) show about SDT?

A

UCLA students = classify majors into HE + HA

HE = business management, marketing
HA = anthropology, sociology

Results = HE majors had higher anti-egalitarian beliefs (SDO + racism) than HA majors

36
Q

Why is this assortment in society happening?

A

Self-selection
Institutional discrimination in hiring
Ideological socialisation on the job
Differential feedback and attrition

37
Q

What research is linked to self-selection?

A

Sidanius et al. (1996) in 2 samples of UCLA students

HE careers, high SDO = law enforcement officer, FBI agent, big business person) = more attractive to high SDO
students

HA careers, low SDO = civil rights lawyer, lawyer for the poor, human rights advocate = more attractive

38
Q

What research is linked to Institutional discrimination in hiring?

A

Pratto et al. 1997
People end up in certain institutions bc they were hired into it.

In an experimental simulation of job hiring for fictional
jobs, students chose:
- high in SDO = hired for HE jobs
- Lower on SDO = hired more into HA jobs

Even though duties, salary and title for each job within
an occupation were similar.

39
Q

How is ideological socialisation on the job linked to SDT

A

Gatto et al. (2009) = sample of police officers w/ 1 yrs training hold more anti-egalitarian attitudes than newly recruited police officers

40
Q

How is differential feedback and attrition linked to SDT?

A

Leitner and Sedlacek (1976) = campus police officers who are more racist = receive more pos. performance evaluations from their supervisors.

41
Q

How do dominant groups maintain their power over subordinate groups (intergroup level processes)?

A

Bahavioural asymmetry = members of subordinate groups behave in ways that are less beneficial to self + ingroup vs bhvr of dom. groups in stable group-based hierarchies

42
Q

What are some examples of bhvral asymmetry?

A

Subordinates = favour dominas over their own ungroups (outgroup favouritism)

Clarke and Clarke (1947) = African-American children from segregated schools. They have 2 dolls: 2 races. Asked which they preferred - all preferred the white doll + had pos. assoc. in it.

Self-debilitation = subordinates show higher levels of
self-destructive behaviors than dominants do (e.g.
internalization of negative ingroup stereotypes-low
expectations of ingroup members, self-fulfilling
prophecies)

43
Q

What are the implications of group-based hierarchies?

A

Group-based hierarchies = maintained by powerful groups + bhvr of subordinate groups (although their agency is constrained)

44
Q

What does SDT emphasise with the role of institutions?

A

The role of institutions = prejudice (prejudice is institutionalized).

Institutional racism = the manipulation/ tolerance of
institutional practices, policies, + laws that unfairly
restrict the opportunities of particular groups of people
based on race, e.g. limiting immigration to certain groups
of people, limiting another group’s voting power.

45
Q

What are the differences with RWA?

A

RWA and SDO = empirically distinct + both are related to prejudice independently of one another (e.g. Henry et al., 2005).

They are ideological orientations (Duckitt, 2006)

RWA taps = submission to authority within one’s ingroup

SDO = preferences for hierarchies between groups.

46
Q

What is the realistic (group) conflict theory?

A

Intergroup conflicts = characterized by ethnocentrism

Before1960s many perspectives on prejudice, discrimination + intergroup behaviour = emphasised indvdl or interpersonal processes in the origins of
ethnocentrism (e.g. authoritarian personality)

47
Q

What is ethnocentrism?

A

The evaluative preference for all aspects of our own group (ingroup) relative to other groups (outgroups).

48
Q

What did Sherif do?

A

Muzafer Sherif, a social psychologist = the origins
of ethnocentrism lie in the nature of intergroup relations + not the properties of individuals.

Ideas tested in a series of field experiments in 1940s + 50s at summer camps for young American boys.

Most famous study is the 1954 Robbers Cave Experiment

49
Q

What happened in the Robbers Cave Experiment up to phase 1?

A

Ps = carefully selected 22 twelve-year old boys for a summer camp. Boys = similar in many ways, did not
know each other and thus had no history of conflict.

Ps = randomly divided into two groups + brought sep. into state park - Robbers Cave in Oklahoma.

Phase 1 = various days:
- 2 groups were unaware of each other’s presence + bonded through typical summer camp activities.
- Both groups adopted different names = Rattlers + Eagles.
- After 1 wk, groups discovered the presence = competitive + hostile emotions between 2 groups (embryonic
ethnocentrism).

50
Q

What happened in the Robbers Cave Experiment up to phase 2?

A

Organised competition = gvg. They were fighting over tournament prizes to the winning team (a mutually exclusive goal).

During this phase, intergroup hostility grew = outside the competitions, e.g.:
– Name-calling (insults)
– Tearing down each other’s flags
– Secretly amassing weapons

51
Q

What happened in the Robbers Cave Experiment up to phase 3?

A

Experimenters created = superordinate goals for Ps w/out
them knowing:

Result = the cooperative activities led to gradual improvement of intergroup relations.

52
Q

What are superordinate goals?

A

Goals desired by both groups but only achieved if the groups cooperate, e.g. collecting money together to
get a movie they all wanted to watch, unblocking a faucet to secure water for the camp.

53
Q

What is the importance of the Robbers Cave experiment (1954)

A

Boys didn’t have authoritarian or dogmatic personalities. Origin of intergroup conflict emerges from somewhere else…

Sherif (1961), Realistic Conflict Theory = intergroup conflict is from fighting over desirable resources - scarce + only be obtained by one group (zero-sum) or they are perceived as such.

54
Q

What propositions are suggested for the Realistic Conflict Theory?

A

Goals = mutually exclusive (e.g. acquiring a scarce resource) and causes realistic intergroup conflict + ethnocentrism (negative interdependence).

Goals which require interdependence (cooperation) for their achievement = intergroup harmony + reduce conflict (positive interdependence).

Prejudice = result of conflicts of interests
between groups.

55
Q

What is the theoretical weakness of Realistic Conflict Theory?

A

Signs of ethnocentrism before groups go into competitions = is ethnocentrism fighting over resources or is it the existence of groups that cause ECM

Idea tested by Tajfel + led to dev. of Social Identity Theory