Predation 2 Flashcards
Animal strategies for avoiding predation
behavioural
signaling
physical features
Behavioural strategies
-seeking refuge
-nocturnality
-defencive circle
-mobbing
-attacking – > chemicals, or physical
-playing dead
-distraction
does reaching refugia cost anything?
costs energy and disrupts foraging ability, however, better unfed than dead
Signaling strategies
-aposematic coloration
-mimicry
-bluffing
Aposematic coloration
prey species that display light and conspicuous colors
-signal that they are distasteful or contain toxins
what happens after a predator encounters a aposematic colored signal and eats the mf or is injured?
-pred wont do dat shi again
-other members of that species can also learn about that
batesian mimicry
non toxic species which resemble a toxic one
mullerian mimicry
toxic species resembles another toxic species
-increased learning effect
bluffing- signaling
make self look bigger–> mayfly
Physical features
-body size
-predator satiation
-rapid movement
-body armor
-autonomy- body amputation
interspecific social dominance
when mimicry is used to reduce competition from other species
pros and cons of body size
pros- not dying(too big)
cons- takes a lot of energy to maintain large body
example of safety in numbers
cicadas emerge in insane quantities every 10 year, satiate predators and reproduce
Gauses predation experiments on refuge
-when put predator and prey in water they both go extinct,
-replicate immigration by restocking,
then voterra model predictions
rescue effect:
individuals from larger pop may immigrate and rescue smaller pop
How do plants defend themselves
- resistance
- tolerance
plant structural defences
pointy stuff
trichomes
hard leaves
trichomes
extention of epidermis
crypsis
defence mechanism where plant hides
-wilting
-blending in
Secondary metabolites
compounds not used for photosynthesis, respiration, growth, or development
alkaloids
noxious odours - mint, sage
repellent taste- quinine
excessive stimulation- caffine
-lethargy- opioids
capsaicin
spice that affects mammals but not birds
Constitutive defences (plants)
pros and cons
-permanent defences
-produced continuously
pro- no need to worry about sudden attacks
con- costs lots of eneergy to maintain, herbivore can coevolve
Induced defences
pros and cons
phenotypic plasticity
concentrations of a defensive chemical increases rapidly in response to herbivore damage
pro- no constant maintenence
con- sudden attacks