piaget Flashcards
describe the main ideas for piagets theory of cog dev
applied darwins evolution
bio knowledge run everyday lives and ensures survival
mind interacts with environ
constructivist - interaction between nature and nurture
domain general - can be applied to all domains, subset of environ to be learnt about
grand stage theory - everything that occurs is subject to being at a specific stage
define a schema
pocket of information
structured organisation of experiences
framework to build upon
becomes increasingly flexible as knowledge enhances
define accomodation
alter schema to fit new info
schema does not entirely fit environ
define assimilation
apply schema to new environ to work out how to deal with
define organisation
the rearrangement of schemas, interconnecting to form and internal cog system
what are the stages of development
sensorimotor 0-24m
preoperational 2-7yrs
concrete op 7-11yrs
formal op 11+
define the sensorimotor stage
infants think via senses
cant carry out mental activity and behabiour is governed by interaction with the external world
grow and refine knowledge until have capacity to think
describe the different stages in the sensorimotor period
reflexive schemes 0-1m - only able to use reflexes which are first centred around own body and then become external
primary circular reactions 1-4m - chance motor activity produces a response that infant tries to repeat and strengthen new schema
secondary circular reactions 4-8m - gain voluntary control via PCR motivated by basic needs. skilled at reaching for and manipulating objects and imitating others
coord secondary circular reactions 8-12m - combine schemas into action sequences, behaviour is goal oriented and intentional .a not b error
tertiary circulatory reactions 12-18m - explore objects in novel ways, imitate novel behaviours and repeat with variation. advanced object permanence mean no more a not b error
mental rep 18-24m - sudden solutions show internal depictions, make belive play and deferred imitation
describe a not b error
incomplete understanding of object permanence
action and object bound to specific location - reaching makes reappear
dont understand that object has been moved
describe Kellman and Spelke (1983) challenges to piaget
habituation and dishabituation in 4m olds
greater dishabituation to when object behind block is not one
describe hood and willat (1986) challenges to piaget
5m old reach in dark for object seen previously
suggest have object permanence
describe billargeon et al (1985) challenges to piaget
5m old habituated to screen that moves back and forth in 180 arc
box placed behind screen
cond 1- possible event - screen stops when reaches box
cond 2 - impossible event - screen continues through space occupied by box
look longer at impossible event suggesting understood box continues to exist when occlueded and screen should stop
describe billargeon (1986) challenged to piaget
infant abilities to represent the existance and location of hidden stationary objects and ability to represent trajectory of hidden moving object
possible event - box placed behind screen away from track
impossible - box on track - should stop car
look longer at impossible and surprised that reappears
criticisms of billargeon
results cannot be fully replicated
effect is perceptual not conceptual
diamond 1985
describe diamond (1985) criticism of billargeon
25 infants tested every 2 weeks on a-b error
delay between hide and retrieval increase from 2 to 7 1/2m
all children display a not b error consistently
girls tolerate longer delays than boys
criticisms of piaget
underestimate idea of core knowledge - born with
too much emphasis on motor and not cognititve
describe the preop stage
thinking somewhat more abstract
think in terms of symbols but not effective
can hold mutually incompatible beliefs
knowledge not concrete
focus on one aspect at a time
knowledge must be refined by equillibriation - when knowledge doesnt fit into new situation, seek to repair by accomodation - forms stable system of invariant subsystems
preop vs concrete op
preop - not attained ability to perform reversible transformations
concrete - not subect to perceptual interference and can have reversible transformation