attachment and parenting Flashcards

1
Q

define family

A

a group of individuals who act as a filter for social influences, socialises new members and stay together as a connected unit even when no longer necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what influences parental and child development?

A

both influence eachother

biodirectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what variables can impact the relationship between parent and child?

A

wider social issues
family members
marrital issues
school and work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the different levels of influence on an individual according to Bronfenbrenner?

A

microsystem - immediate family and friends
exosystem - social and cultural factors
macrosystem - other extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the evolutionary benefits of families

A

neonates are immature at birth so require parents to care for them over a long period of time to ensure survival
ensures the continuation of genes
replace members and prevent social groups dieing out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the main functions of families today

A

repoduction
socialisation
emotional support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe Bowlbys ethological theory of attachment

A

attachment evolved to promote survival

innate reflexes ie crying allows for a response and fulfillment of needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe lorenz and imprinting as a form of attachment

A

lorenz found that after a certain age, ducklings would follow him as they would to a mother duck
recognised lorenz as their primary caregiver
emphasised the importance of critical periods for attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe bowlbys stages for ethological attachment

A

pre attachment 0-6m
- adult close to child but child okay with strangers
dev of attach 6-8m
- laugh and smile more with primary care giver
clearcut attach 8-24m
- show attachment behaviours ie seperation anxiety, stranger anxiety, secure base and social referencing
reciprocal relationship 18+
- seperation anxiety begins to decline, develop object permanent, more reasoning and negotiates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

describe bowlbys internal working model of attachment

A

cognitive framework - mental reps to understand world, self and others
age three - part of a child’s personality - affects their understanding of world and future interactions (Schore, 2000)

confidence assurance and expectiations are influential factors - use memory and prev experiences to asses new situations and contacts

update with age and experience
ie loved, well assured, expect rapid fulfillment of needs = secure
BUT less confident, neglected, unloved = avoidant

Primary care giver ‘prototype’ for future relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

advantages of bowlbys ethological theory of attachment

A

comprised of both a biological and psychoanalytic approach - explain range
based on observable behaviours
research suggests that the attachment styles are relatively stable over time providing support for the rigidity of the theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

disadvantages of bowlbys ethological theory of attachment

A

too prescriptive - ignores environ influences
rutter 1972 - bowlby oversimplify maternal deprivation - broken/disrupted attach
Privation - lack of an attachment
doesnt take into account other attach
cant explain secure attach after critical periods ie adoption
Van Ijzendoorn, & Tavecchio (1987) stable network of adults provide adequate care - may have advantages over a system where a mother has to meet all a child’s needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe bowlby 1944 study

A

juiveniles seperated from mothers - maternal depravation, showed higher levels of antisocial behaviour, unable to form new attachments and little concern for others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how can you measure infant attachment

A

observable behaviours

categorise behaviours into specific attachment types

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe ainsworth attachment types

A

secure - parent secure base, seek care when upset, prefer carer over stranger, seperation anxiety but not always, immediately comforted on reunion
avoidant - unresponsive and not distressed when seperated, avoidant on reunion and doesnt seek
resistant - doesnt explore, clingy, distressed when seperate, not easily comforted
disorganised - unsecure, contradictory and not well understood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantages of ainsworth strange situation

A

naturalistic
standardised and not self report
blanchard and main - compared reliably with home observations
reflects everyday

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

disadvantages of ainsworth strange situation

A

short, artificial episodes so not entirely true to life
20 mins - not reflective of behaviours all the time
mothers behave unnaturally as know being watched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe Waters et al 1995 q sort attachment test

A

at home observation by trained observer
watch over long period
observe wide range of behaviours
may fill out quesitonaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

disadvantages of q sort (waters et al 1995)

A

bias/subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

describe Van Izenboorn and Kroonenberg (1998) study

A

attachment across cultures
secure most common BUT
japan - anxious resistant as spend long periods with mother so not used to seperation
israel - multiple attachments
germany - more avoidant as value independence

21
Q

long term consequences of attachment

A

secure attach has more positive outcomes - confident, social and positive

sroufe et al (2005) teen summer camp study
- insecure more risky sexual behaviours and influences relationships with others

22
Q

explain the stability of attachments

A

30-90% remain as same attachment type
dependent on a variety of factors - ses/life events
consistency in environment more liely to lead to consistency in attachment

by 4-5yrs, appears very resilient

23
Q

reasons for attachment types

A

biringen 2000
- mostly down to the responsiveness and availability of caregiver

van den boorn 1994
- low ses mothers risk of insecure attachments given intervention for responsiveness and improve attachment

24
Q

what is parental responsivity linked to

A

higher academic achievement
more compliant
better social

25
what is parental emotional warmth linked to
``` social adaptation better social skills better high acc achievement lower agg and delinquency protective ```
26
how can communication influence development
more elaborative parents - better memory and more complex language skills important to listen and converse with child into adolescence
27
describe how methods of control can affect child behaviour
kurdeck and fine 1994 consistency of rules has a sig effect and pos rienf most effective op conditioning used to increase good behaviours ie reward charts marawska and sanders 2011 - naughty step not very effective - mixed findings prinzie et al 2004 - neg behaviours correlate with neg discipline general encouragement of good grades = better overall than those rewarded/punished shwartz 1990 - when rienforcement is withdrawn, will engage in activity even less than before
28
studies explaining methods of control
kurdeck and fine 1994 marawska and sanders 2011 prinzie et al 2004 shwartz 1990
29
describe different aspects of parenting
acceptance of child for who they are, control, extent that parent grants apropriate levels of indrependence, and involvement (practical and emotional)
30
styles of parenting
authoritative authoritarian permissive uninvolved
31
describe authoritative parenting
warm, reponsive and patient consistent in control and explains rules allows age appropriate decisions and encourages expects maturity but inderstands level of dev
32
describe authoritarian parenting
emotionally cold, rejecting and negative high control and demanding makes decisions for child, ignores pov traditionally victorian - strict child often aggressive, anxious or withdrwn withdrawn if follows through with punishment and defiant if doesnt
33
describe permissive parenting
warm, indulgent and attentive few demands or boundaries allows non-age app decisions impacts adolescence - antisocial as not used to rules, less independent and poor academic
34
describe uninvolved parenting
``` emotionally detached/withdrawn few demands indifferent to decisins psychologically unavailable can be neglect can lead to risky behaviours in adolescence ```
35
studies of authoritative parenting
corckenberg and litman (1990) parenting linked to consitent good outcomes amato and fauler 2004 fewer problems, high se, academic success
36
describe steinberg and dombusch 1987-1995 study into parenting
longditudinal study of 11000 children into adolescence | maccoby and mrtin criteria - self reliance, confidence, academic, psych distress and misconduct
37
results of steinberg and dombusch 1987-1995
autoritative highest GPA and lowest delinquency gpa decrease and delinquency increase over diff styles - authoritarian, permissive then neglect
38
advantages of martin and maccoby model
steinberg and dombusch confirm the diff styles related to diff outcomes observable behaviours that can be measured
39
disadvantages of martin and maccoby
deterministic and only uses associations doesnt consider external factors on parental style biodirectional - child influence parent unclear if supports critical periods and when it is most important to be specific parenting styles two parents have diff styles styles can change over time and dependent on ext. factors ie work load
40
parent styles and attach
secure = authoritative insecure av = authoritatian/permissive insecure/resist = uninvolved
41
parenting styles and low SES
- value manners and neatness - low paternal involvement - higher physical punish - low authority - high stress
42
parent styles and high ses
- value curiosity, happiness and maturity - greater paternal involvement and education - warmth - higher authority - economic security
43
variatoin in parent style and ses
high ses also linked to depression, anxiety and drug abuse - parents and child overscheduled and dont always spend time - pressure to suceed
44
other influences on dev and parenting style
``` size of family gender structure birth order employment personality characteristics ```
45
attachment and parenting in adolescence
increased conflict same level of attachment teens want more autonomy and form own identities levitt et al 1993 - friends more supporting but fam same support
46
Describe ainsworth strange situation steps
M + c M + c + s C + s M + c C C + s M + c
47
Describe jassens 1994 authoritarian parenting
Look at relationship between rearing, parent locus of control and child behaviour View child as internalise/externalise - low locus of control Low locus of control = authoritarian parenting - sig if see child internalise/externalise More authoritarian If view child as externaliser
48
Describe locus of control
Extent parent believed they can control their child's behaviour
49
Describe Martin and mac obj (1983) definition of parenting
``` Style depend on Demandingness - control - supervision - maturity demands Responsiveness - warmth - acceptance - involvement ``` Authoritative - high demand and response Authoritarian - high demand low response Permissive - low demand high response Uninvolved - low demand and response