Pg 20 Flashcards
What is the duty of candour to the court and fairness to adversary?
Candour towards the tribunal
Duty of candour to the court also applies in what situation?
When the attorney is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding under the tribunal’s authority. I.e. deposition
What kind of things are included in the duty of candor?
Truthfulness in statements to others, no lying to the court, no hiding the ball, no letting a client or a witness lie to the court
Attorneys have a special obligation to protect the tribunal from what?
Criminal or fraudulent conduct that undermines the integrity of the judicial process. I.e. bribing, intimidating, destroying evidence
When an attorney knows his client will give or has given false testimony, what must he do?
Counsel the client not to, attempt to withdraw, and then tell the judge if they attempt to withdraw is unsuccessful
What is included in a tribunal?
Court, arbitrators, legislative bodies, administrative agencies. Anything that has a neutral officer rendering a binding legal judgement after presentation of evidence or legal argument by the parties
What are the three major duties under MR 3.3 related to the duty of candour that an attorney shall not knowingly do?
– Make or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law to the tribunal
– knowingly fail to disclose legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction
– offer evidence that he knows is false
If an attorney finds out he made a false material statement to a tribunal after the fact, what must he do?
Take reasonable remedial measures to disclose it to the tribunal or fix it. If it isn’t material, no problem
In order for an attorney to be sanctioned under the duty of candor, is it enough if he just suspects that a falsity has occurred?
No, he needs actual knowledge of the falsity, but this can be inferred from circumstances. Reasonable belief that information is false is not enough. If the attorney, after reasonable diligence, believes the information is true, he can present it
What is the rule under the duty of candour for attorneys not being able to knowingly fail to disclose legal authority?
The authority must be controlling in the jurisdiction, directly adverse to the position of the client, and not disclosed/cited by the opposing counsel
When does the duty not to knowingly fail to disclose legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction begin?
It doesn’t begin until the other side misses the controlling authority. Attorneys do not have to disclose this authority in their own moving papers, but they must cite adverse authority in reply if the other side doesn’t
If an attorney or his client or a witness called by the attorney offers material evidence that the attorney finds out is false, what must the attorney do?
He must take reasonable remedial measures, which can include if necessary disclosure to the tribunal
When the duty of candour to the tribunal and the duty of confidentiality come into conflict, which one wins?
Duty of candour
In an ex parte proceeding, what is the duty of the attorney?
To inform the tribunal of all material relevant facts known to him that will allow the tribunal to make an informed decision, even if the facts are adverse
What is the reasoning for the rules about ex parte proceedings?
Because these are one-sided proceedings, there isn’t a balance of representation by opposing advocates, so the absent party deserves just consideration through the disclosure of all material facts that are reasonably necessary to make an informed decision