personality disorders Flashcards

1
Q

why does experience matter?

A
  • diversity of experience across individuals
    –> beware of stereotypes
  • need to get away from stigmatising representations
    –> dangerous
    –> willful
    –> self-obsessed
  • high prevalence of personality disorder diagnosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

experiences of personality disorder

A
  • multiple voices and perspectives in your head
  • positive and negative personal attributions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

emotional and interpersonal sensitivity

A
  • conditions and core beliefs
    –> condition = what i do impacts people’s interpretations
  • core beliefs
    –> regardless of what i do and say people with think of me in this way
    –> unconditional
  • things can act as triggers to certain emotional responses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

interpersonal relationships and lack of trust

A
  • linked to personality disorder
  • high lack of trust
  • less relationships
  • those with fear of abandonment may cling onto current relationships regardless of the quality
  • born out of past experiences and maintained by current behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

diagnosis can be paradoxical

A
  • some people feel written off after diagnosis (problem person with no chance of change)
  • for some it can be a huge relief
    –> recognises there is a problem
  • lack of clarity in diagnosis and treatment can be frustrating too
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how do we define personality?

A
  • long term
  • not mood
  • collection of traits across multiple situations, contexts and time
  • tendency towards patterns of behaviour, emotion, cognition and interaction that come through regardless of the situation we are in
    –> trait not state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

influence of personality

A
  • can have positive influence if it fits the demands of the world
  • can be negative influence if it does not fit the world around us or its rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

personality problems in context

A
  • sometimes it doesn’t fit the context
  • sometimes it doesn’t fit any context
  • an aggressive nun and an anxious surgeon can both be problems due to the context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

socio-political perspectives of personality disorders

A
  • a way of saying ‘that person is weird’?
  • a way of saying ‘that person is not acceptable?
  • a way of saying ‘that person is not within social bounds’?
  • a way of saying ‘that person is not diagnosable, but it pretty close and will have an issue soon’?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

early definitions of borderline personality disorders

A
  • early definitions were about being borderline psychotic
  • not in an episode yet but might be soon so lets act now
    –> behaviour as changed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the medico-legal perspective

A
  • are we entitled to jail/detain people on the basis of what we believe they might do?
  • what if we do not and they go on to offend?
  • levels of caution and politics can still get in the way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

categories vs dimensions

A
  • personality varies along dimensions
  • are personality disorders just clumps at either extreme end?
  • or are those with a disorder those clumped at just one end
  • efforts to define disorders used to assume that it was simple categories (DSM-IV)
    –> but now a more mixed approach is used (DSM-5)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DSM-IV definition of personality disorder (1994)

A
  • An enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DSM-5 definition of personality disorder (2013)

A

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

criteria for DSM-5 (2013) definition

A
  • impairments in self or interpersonal functioning
  • one or more pathological personality trait domains or trait facets
  • stable across times and situations
  • impairments are not better understood as normative for developmental stage or socio-cultural environment
  • not directly due to substance or medication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

issues with DSM-5 (2013) personality disorder

A
  • defining ‘significant’ and ‘normative’
  • clinicians tend to use diagnosis regardless of substance use, nutrition issues, injury etc…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

similarities and differences between 1994 and 2013 definitions

A
  • both have the same 10 personality disorders
  • But DSM-5 included research proposals to allow for future potential change in diagnosis
    –> level of personality functioning
    –> personality trait domains and facets
    –> personality disorder types
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

alternative DSM-5 proposal for diagnosis

A
  • look at personality functioning and the severity of impairment
  • look at 5 different personality traits (negative and core) and rate them on a four-point dimensional scale
  • the scores relate to personality types
  • then the diagnosis of a personality disorder type is linked to the ratings on impairment and on personality traits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the 5 trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative proposal

A
  1. negative affectivity
  2. detachment
  3. antagonism
  4. disinhibition
  5. psychoticism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

the 6 personality disorder types

A
  1. antisocial personality disorder
  2. avoidant personality disorder
  3. borderline personality disorder
  4. narcissistic personality disorder
  5. obsessive compulsive personality disorder
  6. schizotypal personality disorder
21
Q

justification for the proposed changes

A
  • poor conceptualisation and low prevalence of diagnoses (paranoid, schizoid, histrionic and dependent)
  • need for scores on measures of personality functioning
    –> indicate the presence of a personality disorder
  • scores on specific personality traits/facets
    –> e.g. detachment; disinhibition; antagonism
    –> tells you which personality disorder you have
22
Q

summary of changes of DSM-4 to DSM-5

A
  • DSM-5 maintains diagnostic criteria from DSM-4 and continues to define personality disorders on categorical basis
  • but it discusses a dimensional approach to the diagnosis of personality disorders and encourages further research on these
23
Q

key issues in reaching diagnosis

A
  • long-term presentations
  • independent of biological factors
    (e.g., drug use; starvation; actual threat)
  • usually do not diagnose in childhood and adolescence
  • diagnoses cannot be made at a single clinical meeting
24
Q

the different personality disorder clusters

A
  1. cluster A
  2. cluster B
  3. cluster C
25
Q

personality disorders in cluster A

A
  • paranoid
  • schiziod
  • schizotypal
26
Q

personality disorders in cluster B

A
  • antisocial
  • histrionic
  • narcissistic
  • borderline
27
Q

personality disorders in cluster C

A
  • avoidant
  • obsessive-compulsive
  • dependent
28
Q

cluster A

A
  • odd and eccentric
  • personality disorders (PD) with some schizophrenia-like features
    –> lacking active symptoms, such as hallucinations
  • paranoid PD
    –> pattern of distrust and suspiciousness
    –> resistant to challenge by others
  • schizoid PD
    –> pattern of separation from social relationships
    –> limited emotional expression and experience
  • schizotypal PD
    –> pattern of eccentric ideas, magical thinking
29
Q

cluster B

A
  • dramatic/erratic
  • personality disorders characterised by impulsive/erratic and/or self-centred behaviours, emotions and thinking
  • antisocial PD
    –> pattern of disregard of other’s rights
    –> strong links to conduct disorders and criminality
    –> selfishness and lack of empathy
  • borderline PD
    –> pattern of unstable relationships, mood, and behaviour
    –> efforts to control emotion (e.g., drink; self-harm) and avoid rejection
30
Q

cluster B continued

A
  • narcissistic PD
    –> pattern of overestimation of own abilities and accomplishments
    –> pervasive need for admiration, while not caring about others
    –> anger when not recognised for their ‘specialness’
    –> fragility of self-esteem
  • histrionic PD
    –> attention-seeking, need to be the centre of attention
    –> dramatic behaviour, undue emotional expression
    –> exaggerated presentation
31
Q

cluster C

A
  • personality disorders characterised by anxiety that is lifelong
    –> not related to any trigger
  • avoidant PD
    –> pattern of social avoidance
    –> inadequacy, and sensitivity to others’ views of them
  • dependent PD
    –> pattern of dependence on others’ care
    –> submissive, clinging, seek others’ approval/support
  • obsessive-compulsive PD
    –> excessive perfectionism (focus on doing the task: forget the goal)
    –> need for order, patterns and control
32
Q

summary of diagnostic clusters

A
  • three broad clusters with ten diagnoses:
    1. odd/eccentric (A)
    2. dramatic/erratic (B)
    3. anxious/fearful (C)
  • big overlap across clusters and diagnoses – it is rare for people to only meet one personality disorder criteria
  • expected to identify which cluster a diagnosis belongs to but not the criteria for each personality disorder
33
Q

prevalence

A
  • focus on prevalence not incidence
    –> no clear onset
  • rate depends on how thorough the assessment is
    –> many are weak and overestimate prevalence
    –> gender bias in diagnosis?
  • most reliable studies suggest rate of 10-15% for all personality disorders
    –> most common = borderline, schizotypal, antisocial and obsessive-compulsive
  • figure vary hugely
34
Q

comorbidity

A
  • high rate of co-occurring personality disorders
    –> likely to meet criteria for more than one
35
Q

mental health issues comorbid with personality disorders

A
  • depression
  • substance misuse
  • panic disorder
  • PTSD
  • social phobia
  • eating disorders
  • neurodiversity
36
Q

is personality disorder for life?

A
  • old viewpoint
    –> yes but the symptoms tend to fade after 40 years of age
    –> untreatable
  • new viewpoint
    –> no as a large number of cases are not diagnosable a few years later
    –> some treatments are efficient and helpful
37
Q

aetiology framework

A
  • biological/neurological factors
  • personality disorder
    –> specific personality disorders
  • environmental factors
38
Q

biological/neurological factors underpinning cluster A PDs

A

general factors:
- genetics
- enlarged ventricles
- enhanced startle response
- cognitive deficits
- lack of link to specific PDs

39
Q

environmental factors underpinning cluster A PDs

A

general factors:
- parental relationships
- rejection
- abuse

40
Q

biological/neurological factors underpinning cluster B PDs

A
  1. antisocial PD
    - childhood conduct disorder
    - genetics
    - low anxiety
    - weak fear conditioning
  2. borderline
    - genetics
    - limbic system dysfunction
41
Q

environmental factors underpinning cluster B PDs

A
  1. antisocial
    - modelling
  2. borderline
    - trauma
    - emotional invalidation
  3. narcissistic
    - doting parents?
  4. general factors
    - our experience drives schema development
42
Q

biological/neurological factors underpinning cluster C PDs

A
  1. avoidant
    - genetics
  2. general factors
    - physiological predisposition to anxiety?
43
Q

environmental factors underpinning cluster C PDs

A
  1. avoidant
    - childhood negative experiences
  2. dependent
    - fear of rejection
  3. general factors
    - our experience drives schema development
44
Q

limited evidence for most disorders

A
  • range of clinical suggestions about treatment
    –> all evidence is psychological and not neurological
  • Beck et al. (2016) provide a range of clinical guidance based on CBT
  • some evidence for other, more integrative therapies
    –> cognitive analytic therapy (Ryle)
    –> mentalization-based treatment (Bateman)
45
Q

the best 2 distinct treatment approaches

A
  1. Dialectical behaviour therapy (Linehan, 1993)
  2. Schema therapy (Arntz & van Genderen, 2009; Young, 2003)
46
Q

Dialectical behaviour therapy (Linehan, 1993)

A
  • behaviourally-based programme
  • managing impulsive behaviours and thought processes in borderline PD
  • elements of contingency management, operant conditioning, mindfulness etc…
  • very resource intensive
  • designed to manage symptoms effectively, but not to remove the cognitions
47
Q

Schema therapy (Arntz & van Genderen, 2009; Young, 2003)

A
  • addresses the cognitions that underpin the behaviours and emotions
    –> core beliefs/schemas
  • a lot of exploration of how those beliefs developed, and modification of the beliefs and emotions
    –> very commonly related to long-term responses to trauma and experience of being parented inadequately
48
Q

most common personality disorder?

A

borderline personality disorder
- field focuses on this type

49
Q

summarise

A
  • PDs are not well defined
  • diagnoses still bein refined
  • causes are more linked to developmental experiences than about neurological factors
  • effective treatments for borderline PD
  • limited understanding of factors underpinning PDs