Personality and social attitudes Flashcards

1
Q

How can the big 5 link to other aspects?

A
  • Religiosity (agreeable, conscientiousness and negative openness)
  • Environmentalism (openness)
  • Mortality (conscientiousness, extraversion, negative neuroticism)
  • Political liberalism (negative conscientiousness and positive openness)
  • Pathogen disgust (conscientiousness, neuroticism and negative openness)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was antisocial personality disorder rated by the facets of neuroiticsm and extraversion?

A

Antisocial PD – Big 5 domains and facets rated by experts – Domains characterised by low A and low C

  • Neuroticism = 2.80 – N-anger/hostility = 4.14 – N-impulsiveness = 4.73
  • Extraversion = 3.53 – E-assertiveness = 4.23 – E-excitement seeking = 4.63
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did -Hirsh (2010) find looking at personality types and political ideology?

A
  • Political ideology typically linked to O and C
  • Liberals tend to be more open - Curious, artistic, interested in change
  • Conservatives tend to be more conscientious - i.e. dutiful, rigid, purposeful
  • Mixed results with other Big Five traits
  • Agreeableness has two aspects – Compassion and politeness
  • These may have counterveiling associations with political ideology
  • Results: – preference for the Republican Party was predicted negatively by Compassion (b = –.32) and positively by Politeness (b = .18)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are Social-cognitive motives?

A
  • Model how we arrive at political attitudes
  • Uncertainty and fear/threat
  • Uncertainty – dogmatism and intolerance to ambiguity
  • Fear – self-esteem
  • Leads to political conservatism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Pease & Lewis (2015) find when looking at anger expression

A
  • Looked at anger expression – how well you can control expression of anger
  • Low conscientiousness and low neuroticism – can control anger better
  • Low conscientiousness and high in neuroticism – harder to control anger
  • High consciousness and low neuroticism – can control anger
  • High conscientiousness and high neuroticism – harder to control anger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Conard (2006) find with mediation of consciousness in students?

A
  • N=300 Psychology undergraduates – Controlling for SAT score (i.e. general intelligence)
  • Conscientiousness leads to educational achievement
  • Is there a pathway which mediates consciousness and educational achievement
  • Looked at attendance – more conscientiousness people attended more regularly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Sibley et al (2012) find with openness and political conservatism?

A
  • Moderation not mediation
  • Openness leads to political conservatism (-.18) (more open you are, less conservative you’ll be)
  • Whether systemic threat predicted how large the association is between openness and political conservatism
  • Low threat countries = -.42
  • High threat countries = association drops to -.06
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do you measure causality?

A
  • Use longitudinal studies – measure at two points at time
  • Cross-sectional data can’t get at causal links – Correlations suggest a causal link – BUT not the direction of the link
  • Two main solutions – Longitudinal studies – Experimental manipulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Wink et al (2012) find about the causality of conscientiousness and religion?

A
  • Measured conscientiousness is adolescents
  • Conscientiousness when you are young, predicts religious sentiments when you’re an adult
  • Didn’t find a link between religiosity in teenagers leading to conscientiousness in adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Wink et al (2012) find about the causality of agreeableness and religion?

A
  • These results held for females only
  • Religion (teenager) leads to agreeableness (late adulthood)
  • Agreeableness (teenager) leads to religiosity (late adulthood)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did block and block (2006) look at looking at nursery school children?

A

-Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later
-Personality measures in kindergarten kids and followed up 20 years later
-Temperament was measured by parents and teachers
-Political views were asked about 20 years later

Findings
-Correlations between items and political views
-All findings are not statistically significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Lewis (2018) find in conduct in children?

A
  • Personality measured at age 5-7 (anxiety, conduct, hyper)
  • Political measures in 30-33 year olds
  • People who showed higher conduct in 5 year olds led to political discontent in adulthood
  • No link between anxiety and hyper activity
  • Parental social class, sex and childhood intelligence was controlled for
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Mediation model?

A
  • Predictors: anxiety, conduct and hyperactivity
  • High levels of conduct, lower education, lower achieved social class, higher political discontent
  • Conduct drives these factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What have marriage studies shown with neuroticism?

A

-Study initiated in mid 1930s
-300 couples due to be married
-Personality rated by friends of the participants in mid 1930s
-Followed up over 50 years
-Marital status tracked

Findings
-Neuroticism leads to marital breakdown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Cooper et al (2013) do using CO2?

A
  • Asked how suspicious an activity is
  • Anxiety appears to cause negative interpretations of ambiguous information
  • Normal air: less suspicious
  • CO2: more suspicious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are Anxiety-hostile judgements?

A

-Anxiety correlated with negative interpretation of ambiguous information
-However, most work is cross-sectional
– Experimental control typically lacking
– Perhaps hostile interpretations lead to anxiety, rather than vice versa
– Perhaps other variables associated with anxiety (e.g. depression) explain the association.

17
Q

Can geography predict personaity/

A
  • Rentfrow et al (2015)
  • Extraversion – London more extraverted compared to Scotland
  • Agreeableness – Scotland more agreeable than London
  • Conscientiousness
  • Neuroticism – higher in Scotland
  • Openness
18
Q

Causes of geographical variation in personality

A
  • Social influence – Clustering encourages assimilation, i.e. attitudes may not start off the same, but converge over time
  • Environmental influence – Climate; urban vs. rural
  • Selective migration – Certain locations appeal to certain characters e.g. city life vs. country life; liberal vs conservative – This in turn may reinforce the appeal of the location. Sexual orientation; artistic communities
19
Q

Is there a Gene-Environment Correlation?

A
  • Passive gene-environment correlation – e.g. genes correlated with books in the house – can mistakenly lead to view that access to books can raise IQ – GEr can lead to amplification of genetic effects
  • Active gene-environment correlation – e.g. genes for sensation-seeking influences going to gigs, leads to exposure to drink/drug culture
  • Evocative gene-environment correlation – e.g. genes for conduct problems lead to heavy scolding, scolding leads to reduced educational attainment etc.
  • GE correlations can inflate estimates of additive genetic influences. – i.e. more going on than just pure genetic effects
20
Q

Genetics of the Environment

A
  • Heritable influences on – Social support (A ≈ .30) – Parental warmth (A ≈ .35) – Negative life events (A ≈ .40)
  • Consistent with the notion that one creates their environment – Genes can (indirectly) build environments