paper 2 human questions Flashcards
For your local place and your contrasting place, evaluate the view that low income is the most important factor leading to deprivation (20)
use comparative language throughout, whenever appropriate
include facts and figures when possible
Signpost at the beginning of each paragraph and at the end
make a comment about “the future” in your conclusion
local- Kidbrooke
contrasting- Blackheath
evaluate - make a decision based on facts
what other factors can lead to deprivation?
deprivation- social and economic.
Introduction:
Define deprivation
background on case studies
To a large extent low income is important, but there are other factors too (education, employment also affect it to roughly the same extent.)
- To a large extent, low income is an important factor that leads to deprivation
Low income leads to deprivation in local case study
Low income in contrasting case study
Similarly affects deprivation in both
Signpost: therefore to a large extent, low income is an important factor that leads to deprivation in both case studies - To a lesser extent than low income, education can nonetheless also lead to deprivation in (local case study) and (contrasting case study)
Facts and figures
Education links to lower income (explain)
Signpost - Employment has a similar impact to education in the local, but a smaller impact in the contrasting case study.
Differences in employment in each case study and how that has led to deprivation.
Signpost
Conclusion
To conclude, all have an impact, although low income has a bigger impact. Recap main argument of the last three paragraphs. Education has the same impact in both case studies, while employment has a bigger impact in the local study. How is this going to change in the future? Signpost sentence.
Assess the view that TNCs have been the most important mechanism in the acceleration of globalisation. (12)
Globalisation is the increase in interconnectivity of countries through flows of transport trade, labour and information. To a smaller extent TNCs have been a small mechanism in the acceleration of globalisation. To a larger extent, transport and trade have also contributed to the acceleration of globalisation.
To a smaller extent, TNCs contribute to the acceleration of globalisation:
outsourcing - flows of labour, capital and products (eg/ McDonalds/ Starbucks), economic globalisation
westernisation - Starbucks originates in the west and then moves into other countries (mainly the East) Cultural globalisation, social globalisation
lack of flow of people and information, so its quite specific
TNCs rely on trade and transport
Signpost
Trade has a larger impact on globalisation then TNCs but a smaller impact than transport on the acceleration of globalisation:
WTO - liberalised free trade - economic globalisation. governments help aid free trade - political globalisation
trade relies on transport
Signpost
Transport has the largest impact out of all three factors to a large extent.:
jet aircraft (20th century) - social economic globalisation
Steam power - movement of goods and people
Containerisation - economic, political globalisation
Internet (21st Century) flow of information leading to cultural globalisation
Conclusion: To a large extent, transport is the most important factor driving globalisation, because both TNCs and trade rely on it.
Signpost
Assess how national governments can influence the rate of globalisation. (12)
intro - national gov: more open to FDI (1978 China open door policy), joining trade blocs. they influence diff types of globalisation including social, cultural, economic and political flows.
- social flows: connectedness, allows for population to stay in touch. can be done my transportation / internet / social media.
e. g China banned Facebook & google - limits growth
e. g Kenya M pesa banking app - allows micro loans for women, 1/3 GDP goes though annually, allows farmers to get prices before selling - cultural flows: spreading culture / preventing cultural erosion. can be done via film / music / internet/ food
e. g USA Hollywood , India Bollywood, Nollywood
e. g. spread of culture and tradition : Chinese new year annually. in new York , London (china towns) - Economic flows ( MOST important) - economic relevance globally, trade blocs (NAFTA, EU, ASEAN) free trade within certain countries. however countries can be excluded from blocs and their development hindered.
e.g EU moved from trade block to multigovernmental organisation and has one currency and no borders, allows free movement of ppl
e.g China Open door policy 1978 (open to outside investment mixed economy for free trade markets, now fastest growing economy globally.
neo liberlisation
business start ups
WTO - liberalised free trade - economic globalisation. governments help aid free trade - political globalisation
Assess the extent to which developments in transport and communication technologies have accelerated globalisation (12)
Globalisation is the increase in interconnectivity of countries through flows of transport, trade, labour and information.
To a larger extent, transport and communication tech have contributed to the acceleration of globalisation. To a smaller extent TNCs have been another mechanism in the acceleration of globalisation.
Transport has the largest impact out of all factors to a large extent
-jet aircraft (20th century) - social economic globalisation
-Steam power - movement of goods and people
-Containerisation - economic, political globalisation
Internet (21st Century) flow of information leading to cultural globalisation
communication - ICT (Information Communication Technology) developments have reduced communication costs and increased global communication flows, since the late 20th century.
- Reduced mobile phone costs = more usage and demand
Used in countries with a lack of communications infrastructure. By 2015, 70% of people in Africa owned a mobile phone.
-Close to 50% of the world’s population uses internet.
-social media (Facebook 2006, Instagram 2010, WhatsApp 2010) enabled much cheaper communication between friends and family than landline telephone = has led to space-time compression, where the cost (time or money) of communicating over distance has fallen, people can communicate regardless of distance. 2003 Skype has allowed cheap, face-to-face communication, allowing migrants to maintain stronger bonds with their distant family.
More than 1 million kilometres of flexible undersea cables carry the world’s data.
To a smaller extent, TNCs contribute to the acceleration of globalisation:
outsourcing - flows of labour, capital and products (eg/ McDonalds/ Starbucks), economic globalisation
westernisation - Starbucks originates in the west and then moves into other countries (mainly the East) Cultural globalisation, social globalisation
lack of flow of people and information, so its quite specific
TNCs rely on trade and transport
Signpost
Trade has a larger impact on than TNCs but a smaller impact than transport on the acceleration of globalisation:
WTO - liberalised free trade - economic globalisation. governments help aid free trade - political globalisation
trade relies on transport
Signpost
Conclusion: To a large extent, transport is the most important factor driving globalisation and then communication because TNCs and trade rely on it.
Signpost
Assess the significance of IGOs & economic organisations in accelerating globalisation (12)
intro - Globalisation is the increase in interconnectivity of countries through flows of transport trade, labour and information. IGOs have promoted neo-liberal views of development based on the adoption of free trade, privatisation and deregulation of financial markets but also, recent programmes have been aimed at improving environmental quality, health, education and human rights. - very significant in acceleration economic and political globalisation
promotion of free trade policies
and foreign direct investment (FDI)
Organisations have helped to promote free trade and end ‘protectionism’. In the past, many countries protected their own industries and businesses by: demanding taxes / tariffs on imported goods, so making them more expensive than home-produced goods.
Using quotas to limit the volume of imports, protecting home producers from foreign competition. Restricting, or banning, foreign companies from investing in their country.
Protectionism reduces total trade volume, whereas free trade (no taxes, tariffs, or quotas) increases it.
World Bank - role of lending money giving grants to the developing world to fund economic development and reduce poverty.
2014 - $470 million loan Philippines for poverty reduction programme. $70 million grant to the Democratic Republic of Congo for HEP project.
HOWEVER requires recipients to adopt trade liberalisation policies and open up to FDI by removing legal restrictions. It also requires them to adopt structural adjustment programmes to reduce government budget deficits. helped developing countries develop deeper ties to the global economy but been criticised for having policies that put economic development before social development.
The IMF provides loans to countries facing debt. aims to maintain a stable international financial system, and this promotes free trade and globalisation.
HOWEVER IMF has been criticised for promoting a ‘western’ model of economic development that works in the interests of developed countries and their TNCs. Also, Recipients must adopt structural adjustment and trade liberalisation programmes e.g open up to FDI and free trade.
World Trade Organisation (WTO) - international organisation that works to reduce trade barriers & create free trade.
WTO’s ‘most favoured nation’ requires a country to treat all WTO members to the same low barriers as the most favoured.
Mainly benefits developed and emerging countries.
Deals with the flow of goods and services (commodities), not specifically about FDI (financial flow from one country to another for purpose of constructing physical capital, i.e. building a factory in another country.)
however to a smaller extent, transport and communication are also significant in accelerating globalisation.
aircrafts, steam power - movement of goods,
internet, social media, apps
fibre optics - 1m cables underwater carry worlds data
Evaluate the extent to which differences in economic activity is reflected through variations in your local & contrasting place (20)
Evaluate how external factors have shaped the functional characteristics of your local place (20)]
function: role a place plays for its community/surroundings - can change. e.g. banks, department stores, doctors surgeries
Kidbrooke’s functional changes?
1: firstly agricultural land
2: then had RAF bases
3: then post ww1 homes for heroes (lloyd george) began to make kidbrooke residential
4. Ferrier Estate residential continued until
5. A2 motorway built for connectivity
6. Ferrier estate declined - noise, air pollution
7. more residential of Kidbrooke Village regeneration
kidbrooke always had function of social housing (residential)
connectivity & accessibility to Kidbrooke has changed:
A2 motorway, railway station, close proximity to city airport
DLR, public transport
historical development of social issues in Kidbrooke changed:
agricultural
RAF base
homes for heroes
Ferrier estate: deprived, low income area, high crime
Kidbrooke village: increased affluence, lower crime
(EU accession migration of European migrants before motorway)
role of gov. and other stakeholders: MOST SIGNIFICANT
post ww1 homes for heroes (lloyd george) & Ferrier estate built
Berkeley homes + local gov funds + national gov funds made kidbrooke village £1bn regeneration
local interest groups like Blackheath society influenced the gov to not built the A2 motorway though Blackheath - educated and rich
physical location:
proximity to global hub : London, Canary Wharf (financial capital), close to CBD
Evaluate how external factors have shaped the demographic characteristics of your local place (20)
demographic change: characteristics of age, ethnic composition, socio economic background, gentrification, studentification.
kidbrooke demographic changes:
- increasing population - people lived near London so they were affluent to afford semi detached houses.
- post WW2 homes for heroes = 400k homes built everyone like it.
- historical development - migration of eastern European migrants 1972 EU
- spiral of decline after A2 built. affected poor people more
- regeneration of kidbrooke village: pricey homes, fast train services = gentrification happening today, affluent young business people attracted to kidbrooke. poorer people pushed out, old people affected by busy area. long term.
63% good health
24% BME
47% level 4 qualifications
Evaluate how past and present connections have shaped the social characteristics of your chosen place (20)
Evaluate how past and present connections have shaped the economic characteristics of your chosen place (20)
Evaluate how regional & national influences have shaped your chosen place (20)
Evaluate how economic & social changes have influenced people’s identity (20)
Evaluate the extent to which infrastructure investment can regenerate an area (20)
- improving transport links.
improves migration and trade link = increases economic productivity. e.g. H2S rail network connect London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. connects poor regions to economic core in London & south east. reduces travel times and increase connectivity. accessibility is key to improving area. north south divide becomes more reduced.
Also ast Manchester metro link, so city centre more accessible people can work and boost economy, more income coming in. - improves built environment
kidbrooke village - shops, housing, parks built to attract families, young business people for more economic & social growth. lot of green aesthetic space, enjoy leisure time. business owners benefit from more profit. positive long term impact for locals.
Stratford regeneration of Olympic park - improves social progress, gives positive view to public, more friendly open spaces and improved services. both economy and built environment improved, on the way to sustainability (Egan Wheel factors) - however infrastructure can also cause problems.
A2 motorway in Kidbrooke 1988 caused housing estate to fall into decline because of increased air and noise pollution.
similarly, many MPS, residents and environmental NGOs oppose 3rd runway in Heathrow, it will increase traffic and pollution, impacts mental and physical health, also larger scale issue of global climate change, adds more co2 emissions, unsustainable.
fracking to become more energy secure, increase jobs and grow economy. This has failed as its unethical, adds to degradation of environment & disturbs public.
Elizabeth line - creates jobs and connects South Est to North West. however increased housing prices in now attractive areas e.g., Woolwich and consequently drives locals out of area, leads to gentrification. decreases quality of life.
to conclude infrastructure investment regenerates an area positively to a much larger extent that it does to ruin an area, the aim of regeneration to improve an area by infrastructure reduces journey times, increases jobs and services and built environment, this can be seen by improvements in the IMD factors and Egan wheel. This overpowers the negative aspects of infrastructure where people are disturbed.
Evaluate the role of national governments in promoting growth in an area (20)
intro - role of gov: planning permission, funding schemes in areas (leisure and culture led), sports led promoting growth after events to attract investments.
ability to create growth: economic growth links to social change demographic change / gentrification)
- planning permission - allow for culture led schemes.
Kidbrooke ‘Berkley Homes’ will have made billions by the end of the regeneration scheme with the land provided to them cheap due to the principle of planning gain. they have been provided government funding, have built school & doctors surgery.
social growth : brings change to economic demographic of an area. - funding diff. regeneration schemes in areas promote tourist investment via retail led regeneration. the gov can promote investments from public via shopping etc.
gov is investing £1bn in high street to maintain jobs and prevent growth of online shopping.
culture le: could argue Boscombe was culture led as area had an coast that made it attractive. gov spent £3bn on artificial reef that failed! - promoting growth via external stakeholders: sport led regeneration from externals due to opportunities.
2012 Olympic games: £13bn invested into national economy and 100k jobs created by govs. role of having games in the UK.
growth: Stratford had 10k homes built and 3 new schools - promoting demographic change (regeneration -> gentrification or changes in economic policy: CBD district
national policies e.g. deregulation of economy by Thatcher the witch.
deregulation of banking industry led to FDI and promoted growth of the east end which was suffering from a spiral of decline due to outsourcing.
Evaluate the ways in which local governments can create sympathetic environments for investment (20)
science park
Evaluate the success of urban regeneration scheme you have studied (20)
kidbrooke?
STRATFORD
glasgow gorbals
Evaluate the success of rural regeneration scheme you have studied (20)
cornwall???
eden project
Evaluate the factors that might influence the view of different stakeholders’ perception of success (20)
intro: factors- profit of building (planning gain), aiding local area. cost effective/benefits national economy, whether it brings money or business.
stakeholders: business, locals, gov (regional & national), building companies.
- local businesses : perception of success will be relative to economic investment which follows the regeneration scheme. any scheme that increases their customer base is likely to be supported by the business.
e. g Boscombe tourism led regeneration. initial success with reef brought back tourists after the area suffered spiral of decline in 1970s as international holidays flourished, however has left many business going bust as surf industry has collapsed again. - national and regional government: perception will be based off economic / social success of scheme. Stratford = large success.
10k new homes (regional gov happy, housing crisis fixed)
100k new jobs (national gov happy, increases economic output decreasing level of employment) - building companies: profit / planning gain (how much they benefit from the project itself economically)
e. g. kidbrooke: ‘Berkley homes’
- gov subsided part of the scheme in return for housing.
- 1000s of home prices over £400k off of cheap land = major profit!
Evaluate the effectiveness of geopolitical interventions in defence of human rights (20)
Geopolitical interventions can come in a variety of forms including giving development aid, trade embargoes and military aid and intervention, however although all aim to improve peoples human rights this can often not end up being the case and varies considerably between different regions.
-One of the most common forms of intervention can be that of development aid, which can be through bi-lateral agreements from one country into another or more commonly multi-lateral through IGOs or NGOs. This is usually given to developing countries to help them with development or to help in times of crisis however there are a number of examples where this seems to not improved human rights at all if not actually worsened them. An example of this can be seen in Haiti, a country that has and still does receive a large amount of aid mainly from IGOs such as the IMF. It has received over $12bn in aid for 2010 disaster yet despite this still remains one of the poorest countries with much of the population continuing to live in poverty. only 5bn has been given. also language barrier of red cross helpers wa diffuciult to communicate. also sitll 50k people living in temp. shelters.
However development aid doesnt always reduces human rights. For example large successes can be seen especially in regard to MDGs. For example aid given by the WB into primary education within developing countries and investing in improving maternal health has lead to global reductions by 44% in maternal mortality rates. Also through development aid given by the UN in many African countries has helped prevent malaria deaths by over 6 million, clearly improving peoples human rights as has saved peoples lives and most likely many more into the future.
-This perhaps shows that whether geopolitical interventions are success or not depends greatly on those involved. For example in Haiti the main reason this can be seen to not be successful is due to the strict conditions imposed on it in receiving these loans, as well as a long history of being in a state of debt leading it into a dependency cycle that is hard to get out of. However in countries that receive aid such as for specific things such as education or healthcare, perhaps as these are more short term and are given often without conditions, they are more successful. Also the actual place the aid is going to effects the success, with Haiti having a large history with being corrupt, something that perhaps is the reason conditions have been applied to it.
there is also debates as to whether military action always improves human rights, as often despite the aim being to do this the opposite ends up occurring. For example it cannot be denied that the military action taken in Syria by countries such as uk and US has not improved the human rights of the local civilians, with almost half of the Syrian population being displaced or dead and 7 million now being refugees throughout Europe. enviormental degresdation. comtsmination and heritage sites e.g Aleppo have also been destoryed. assad fired chemical weapons at civillians. HDI decreased from 0.65 to 0.5 in 2018.
however at times it could be said military intervention especially non-military action may help improve them. for example in 2011 the 2nd civil war of the ivory coats specil french military helped defend the president supporters against the 2010 loser preisdent Gbagbo, he and his wife were arrested for war cfimes. ivorcy coast is now stable and president was re elected.
Conclusion- therefore can be seen interventions often do reduced human rights, especially in longer term without any plans in place. But must be said that the location etc of where the intervention takes place is also important in determining this.
Evaluate the view that geopolitical interventions are ineffective in defence of human rights (20)
intro- Geopolitical interventions can come in a variety of forms including giving development aid, trade embargoes and military aid and intervention, however although all aim to improve peoples human rights this can often not end up being the case and varies considerably between different regions.
- one of the most common forms of intervention can be that of development aid, which can be through bi-lateral agreements from one country into another or more commonly multi-lateral through IGOs or NGOs. This is usually given to developing countries to help them with development or to help in times of crisis however there are a number of examples where this seems to not improved human rights at all if not actually worsened them. e.g Haiti, a country that has and still does receive a large amount of aid mainly from IGOs such as the IMF. It has received over $35billion in aid since the 1990s yet despite this still remains one of the poorest countries with much of the population continuing to live in poverty. This is mainly due to much of the aid it receives being tied to loans and given through SAPs. It is now classed as a HIPC yet in order for it to receive these loans and to have its debts cancelled, strict conditions are applied, such as large cuts on public spending + privatising local businesses which are having large impacts on the human rights of the population. e.g. poor infrastructure, health + sanitation and due to so many NGOs now being in the country local businesses cannot compete and so the economy is still not growing with little impact from TNCs. Also from 2015 only 1/2 promised aid has been provided, many aid workers couldn’t speak the language, 500k people are still living in temporary shelters after the 2010 earthquake immediate aid intervention.
- However it cannot be said that development aid is always ineffective. For example large successes can be seen especially in regard to MDGs. For example aid given by the World Bank into primary education in developing countries and investing in improving maternal health has lead to global reductions by 44% in maternal mortality rates. Also through development aid given by the UN in many African countries has helped prevent malaria deaths by over 6 million, clearly improving peoples human rights as has saved peoples lives and most likely many more into the future.
This perhaps shows that whether geopolitical interventions are success or not depends greatly on those involved. For example in Haiti the main reason this can be seen to not be successful is due to the strict conditions imposed on it in receiving these loans, as well as a long history of being in a state of debt leading it into a dependency cycle that is hard to get out of. However in countries that receive aid such as for specific things such as education or healthcare, perhaps as these are more short term and are given often without conditions, they are more successful. Also the actual place the aid is going to effects the success, with Haiti having a large history with being corrupt, something that perhaps is the reason conditions have been applied to it.
- There is also debates as to whether military action always improves human rights, as often despite the aim being to do this the opposite ends up occurring. For example it cannot be denied that the military action taken in Syria by countries such as UK and US has not improved the human rights of the local civilians, with almost half of the Syrian population being displaced or dead and 4 million now being refugees throughout Europe.
However at times it could be said military intervention especially non-military action may help improve them. For example Libya civil war/number of civilian casualties led to UN intervention including no fly zones
Was successful as Gadafi was killed! however this led to a power vacuum for the Islamic State. dead: 100k. displaced: 645k
Also in Timor leste the actions of the UK and US with trade/military embargoes and negotiation talks by the UN ensured that Indonesia military withdrew peacefully meaning more deaths were prevented clearly helping the human rights of the population. However again, looking at the long term Timor leste has now been left in poor conditions with little help and so human rights have declined.
Conclusion- therefore can be seen interventions often are effective in defence of human rights, especially in longer term without any plans in place. But must be said that the location etc of where the intervention takes place is also important in determining this.
Evaluate the extent which measuring the outcomes of geopolitical interventions are successful (20)
Evaluate the extent to which military interventions are effective in defence of human rights (20)
intro - define intervention, types - development aid, disaster aid, trade embargoes, military aid, indirct & direct military aid. although all aim to improve peoples human rights this can often not end up being the case and varies considerably between different regions.
- military interventions are effective military example in 2011 the 2nd civil war of the ivory coats specil french military helped defend the president supporters against the 2010 loser preisdent Gbagbo, he and his wife were arrested for war cfimes. ivorcy coast is now stable and president was re elected.
Libya civil war/number of civilian casualties led to UN intervention including no fly zones Was successful as Gadafi was killed! however this led to a power vacuum for the Islamic State. dead: 100k. displaced: 645k - not so effective - military action always improves human rights, as often despite the aim being to do this the opposite ends up occurring. For example it cannot be denied that the military action taken in Syria by countries such as uk and US has not improved the human rights of the local civilians, with almost half of the Syrian population being displaced or dead and 7 million now being refugees throughout Europe. enviormental degresdation. comtsmination and heritage sites e.g Aleppo have also been destoryed. assad fired chemical weapons at civillians. HDI decreased from 0.65 to 0.5 in 2018.
middle east cold war - less effective than military aid - devloment / disaster aid
haiti 2010 earthwauek disaster
lqnhguage barrier, 12bn aid promised butvonly 5bn given due to corrupt governnce and bribes. 500k still liv in shelter. cholera outbreak = less effective than military interventon long term takes longer to work as its not hard power
conclusion
Evaluate the view that non-military interventions have a stronger record of improving human rights and development than military intervention (20)
Development aid takes many forms, from charitable gifts (e.g. hazard relief) from NGOs or governments, to loans that must be paid back.
Human rights are improved in terms of access to healthcare, eradication of poverty, primary education, gender equality and help for those with malaria etc. Development aid often focuses on improving these rights with specifically
targeted projects, e.g.to improve maternal health, or to build schools. Progress towards improving human rights varies between countries because of wealth, conflict, governance, location, trade opportunities, colonial legacy and other factors.
Development aid may come from NGOs, bilateral arrangements or multilateral agencies like the UN, World Bank, or Global Fund who have different priorities.
There may be some who do not benefit from development aid because it does not “trickle down” to those in most need, but is siphoned off to government elites, meaning that human rights for the majority are ignored.
Some states have experienced decreased human rights (e.g. Iraq, Syria) where development aid has not been sufficient to overcome costs of military intervention.
Assess the extent to which superpower demands can cause environmental degradation and global warming (12)
To a large extent, superpower demands can cause environmental degradation and global warming. but it can also can cause political and socio - economic challenges to a smaller extent.
- Global carbon dioxide emissions in 2015: 29% China , 14% USA, 10% EU, 7% India, 5% Russia, 35% Rest of the world. Energy demand will increase by 40% in 2040 compared to 2010. With countries relying heavily on non-renewables, there will be a point where they are no longer available. China accounts for over half of the worlds coal consumption but only 19% of the world’s population. Causes enhanced greenhouse effect leading to higher global sea and land temperatures.
to combat this, countries have come up with policies and agreements e.g. Paris Agreement 2015. However USA and China are reluctant to set emissions reduction targets, whereas the EU has often led in this regard. EU and US emissions are falling (because of greater efficiency and green policies) but in China emissions are still rising.
Attitudes to issues such as trade, globalisation and attitudes to the environment differ between countries. The EU has shown itself willing to reduce the global warming threat, but this is less true of the USA and even less so of the emerging powers (China, Russia), which tend to prioritise economic development over environmental protection.
2. rising middle class - Over the next 30-40 years resource demand in the USA/EU is likely to remain static. Most people are already wealthy and their demand for more resources will be met by efficient use of existing resources. In emerging powers, this is not the case. Pressure on resources has a number of causes: increasing population (India, Indonesia & Brazil) increasing wealth: the global middle class (people earning $10-100 per day) is expected to increase from 2 billion in 2012 to 5 billion by 2030. this increases demand for: Rare earths - 80-90% of global rare earth production is in China - rare earth metals (e.g. Scandium used in electronic, medical and laser devices. Food - as China and India develop = increased demand for wheat, rice. Demand for meat, dairy products and sugar will also rise as these countries transition to 'Western' diets. Oil - in 2015 the USA used 19 million barrels of oil per day, China 12 million and India 4 million. Indian and Chinese demand could reach American levels. Water - In USA and EU washing machines, dishwashers, a daily shower and swimming pools are common. vast additional water supplies will be needed if emerging countries do it. the rise of middle-class consumption will affect the physical environment: more mining, oil drilling and deforestation in the quest to access raw materials, increased carbon emissions from higher energy consumption and more factories, problems disposing of consumer waste in landfill sites, more use of water so more polluted waste water. High resource consumption (the last stage in Rostow’s Modernisation Model) has caused many environmental problems: - Urban air quality in emerging power cities is very dangerous due to poor vehicle engines. - Imports and exports have increased so CO2 has increased through increased transport. This means goods have a larger carbon footprint. - Deforestation has accelerated as people cut down trees in order to grow crops for food or biofuel.
- can also lead to socio - economic consequences and political challenges
The price of key resources rises as higher demand puts pressure on supply
The availability of resources (non-renewable ones) falls as some supplies are used up.
contested spheres of influence:
oil in the Artic is becoming increasingly contested for. 30% of the world’s undiscovered gas and 13% of oil are in the Artic. creates political challenges between countries on who has the right to use these resources. Much of the dispute centres around whether an area of ocean bed is an extension of Russia’s EEZ, or not. Three of the contesting parties, USA, EU and Russia, all have nuclear weapons, which gives them hard power. In 2007, Russia planted their flag on the seabed of the North Pole, which ignited tensions between the countries.
The risks of environmental disaster from oil spills is high in one of the few remaining pristine ecosystems on the planet also with a large indigenous population (Inuit).
Russian invaded and took Crimea by force to gain total control of the Russian naval base in Crimea - home to Russia’s Black Sea Fleet
Russia feared that if Ukraine joined the EU and NATO this strategic base could be lost
Fearing the loss of land and a port, both physical resources, Russia acted.
to conclude, environmental degradation and global warming will be the main consequence of increasing resource demands. if political conflict happens, this can lead to the degradation of environment e.g. ruined infrastructure, contaminated water and pollution.