Page 45 Flashcards
Who has the burden of proving a qualified or conditional privilege for defamation?
Defendant
Under a qualified or conditional privilege for defamation, when is the defendant protected?
When he makes a statement, unless:
- he acts with malice
- exceeds the scope of his privilege
- makes a statement without believing it is true
What are the qualified or conditional privileges that apply to defamation?
IRAC DAC
- INTEREST: protection of own interest
- REPORT: fair and accurate report
- AUTHORS: freelance authors
- CONSTITUTIONAL privilege
- DICTATION
- ASK: credit agencies and prospective employers
- fair COMMENT
Why is it a qualified privilege for a boss to explain why he fired someone?
Because he was not trying to defame the person
Are you allowed to say matters of public interest to an official that is empowered to deal with the matter without being liable for defamation?
Yes, you can tell your suspicions to a cop
What are qualified or conditional privileges for defamation based on?
Moral, legal, or social obligations
How is a person allowed to protect his own interest as a qualified or conditional privilege to defamation?
If he is wrongly accused, he can exonerate himself by implicating someone else, or can explain why something happened
If someone asks you why you quit your job, and that requires that you make a statement about your boss that would otherwise be defamatory, do you have a qualified privilege to explain yourself?
Yes, under protection of your own interest
What is the fair and accurate report qualified privilege for defamation?
You can report a public meeting and info and public records as long as it is accurate and unbiased
Would a radio station or TV station be liable for a broadcast that has defamations during a campaign speech?
No, because that would fall under the fair and accurate report qualified privilege for defamation
What is the fair comment qualified privilege for defamation?
Critics are allowed to comment on the efforts of others like writers, stars, athletes, restaurants, etc.
What are the two different views about fair comment privilege to defamation?
- majority view: protected if it was about a matter of public interest, based on truth, and honestly believed
- minority view: as long as the critic honestly believed it, the privilege stays even if the facts are incorrect
If a credit agency or prospective employer asks you for information about someone, can you be liable for defamation?
No, responses to these people are privileged so long as the party who asked you for it needed the information, and the information was relevant
How can you lose a qualified privilege for defamation?
- if you don’t have an honest belief that what you said was true
- you give more information than was necessary
- you exceed the scope of the privilege
- you act with malice
What is the burden of proof for a qualified privilege for defamation?
- Defendant must prove the privilege is applicable
- Plaintiff must show the privilege was lost
What is excessive publication, and how can it result in the loss of a qualified privilege for defamation?
When a person speaks so loudly in a public place that they are overheard by others
Is dictation considered a privileged for defamation?
Sometimes, because of the confidential relationship involved, although most courts say that any publication to any third party is defamation