Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Torts FYLSE > Add-ons > Flashcards

Add-ons Flashcards

1
Q

Is the requirement of a license to drive meant to prevent pedestrians in crosswalks from being hit by unlicensed drivers?

A

No, the requirement of a driver’s license is for registration and identification of drivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If you don’t have a current driver’s license, does that establish your incompetence to drive?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If you cause an injury while driving without a current license, is that a negligence per se situation?

A

No, because your lack of a license is not a safety statute violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If someone harms someone while driving with an expired license, does that create strict liability on the basis of engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If a mechanic inspected your brakes, and then they failed, can that be the basis for strict liability?

A

No, because he only inspected them, he did not install new ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can a product be defective if it doesn’t include a feasible safety device?

A

Yes, if the device would prevent injuries foreseeably incurred in ordinary use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can a manufacturer avoid SPL if he offers a safety device for a product as an additional purchase?

A

No, because that indicates the company had reason to foresee that the product, without the safety device, would pose a significant risk to someone who operates it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If it is feasible to install a safety device, does a manufacturer fulfill its obligation to make a safe product by warning the purchaser that the product is unsafe?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a company supplied and installed a defective engine in the normal course of business in maintaining and repairing private airplanes, what are they considered?

A

A commercial seller of the defective product, so they can be held strictly liable for damages caused by the pilot as a result of his use of the defective engine. (The pilot can recover the full amount of the judgment against him from this commercial seller)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If necessity privileges you to trespass on someone’s property, is the owner allowed to untie your boat?

A

No, then he has committed an unprivileged trespass against your property, and he must pay for the loss of your boat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If an upstream owner of property stops the flow of the stream of water to downstream property, what is that considered?

A

Private nuisance, because it interferes with the use of enjoyment of the downstream property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If a fact pattern says that joint and several liability has been abolished, what does that mean?

A

Each defendant is liable only for his own share of the damages, not the entire award

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Contribution between tortfeasors is only available when what?

A

One defendant has paid more than his determined share of the damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the obligations and status of a city?

A

They are considered a municipality with tort immunity limitations set by the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are municipalities immune from tort liability?

A

Usually, with a few exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the exceptions that apply to municipality immunity from tort liability?

A
  1. Torts committed in a proprietary capacity
  2. Municipality created nuisances
  3. Negligently maintained municipal property, like roads, streets, sewers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does a municipality owe a higher duty of care than a landlord to an invitee?

A

No, the standard is to make conditions reasonably safe within a reasonable period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If a parent doesn’t exercise control about a known propensity of his child, is he vicariously liable for the child’s tortious behavior?

A

No, he is liable for his own negligence in failing to control the child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If a bystander forcefully pushed a pedestrian, thinking unreasonably that he was protecting her, can he be liable for battery?

A

Yes because:

  • he acted intentionally
  • made harmful contact
  • his actions were not privileged, because he had to have had a reasonable belief (and his belief was not reasonable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can a child as young as 4 be held capable of forming tortious intent and be liable for his actions?

A

Yes, any minor can be liable for an intentional tort as long as he possesses the requisite intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Work in public places often gives rise to what kind of duty on the part of the landowner?

A

A non-delegable duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

If a mall contracts with an independent contractor to fix an escalator, who will be liable if a customer is injured?

A

The mall, because their duty to maintain safe conditions is non-delegable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

If a newspaper writes about a political candidate’s ex-wife, saying she was unfaithful, can she have a claim for defamation as a private person suing on an issue of public concern?

A

Yes, because she is not a public figure, so she doesn’t have to prove New York Times malice, she only has to prove the Gertz standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the Gertz standard for defamation?

A

It must be proven that the newspaper:

  • published false information
  • was negligent in investigating its accuracy
  • caused actual harm to P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the three major categories of intentional torts?

A

Injury to body, emotions, and property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the three types of intentional torts that qualify as injury to the body?

A

Assault, battery, false imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are the two types of injury that are classified under intentional torts for injury to the emotions?

A

Distress associated with a separate tortious injury, and IIED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the two extra considerations for false imprisonment?

A
  • if the plaintiff was aware of the confinement or actually harmed
  • whether there was a reasonable means of escape
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are the two major categories for intentional torts for injury to property?

A
  • injury to real property

- injury personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is the purpose of a driver’s license?

A

For registration and identification of drivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

How can you recover on a battery claim against a child?

A

If you can show the child intended to touch you in a way that would be harmful or offensive, even if he was too young to understand what he was doing or appreciate the wrongfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Must you have proof of intent to cause injury or knowledge that injury might result to recover on the battery claim?

A

No, as long as you intend to touch the person in a way that will be harmful or offensive, that is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

If you buy a television from the store, and four years later it starts on fire while you’re sleeping, does that establish negligence on behalf of the store?

A

No, Res Ipsa Loquitur would not apply here, because the manufacturer is the one that might’ve been negligent, or the negligence might’ve happened after the sale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Is lack of privity a barrier to negligence claims based on malfunctioning products?

A

No, anyone foreseeably put at risk by the defective product and actually injured by it can sue for negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

If you buy a product with a warning on it, and your friend uses the product, what is your duty?

A

Duty of a reasonably prudent person to warn the friend of the risks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Does the term “nondelegable duty” apply to many factors in strict liability claims?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the two types of nuisance?

A

Private nuisance and public nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What are the two extra questions that you should ask when you’re dealing with public nuisance?

A
  • if a representative of the public is the one suing

- if the plaintiff has suffered damages that are different in kind from those inflicted on the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are the two different torts involved in an injury to personal property?

A

Conversion and trespass to chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is the question you should always ask once you’ve dealt with the elements of conversion and trespass to chattels?

A

If there is an available remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What are the two different kinds of consent?

A

Express and implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What are the things that can negate consent?

A

DIMSFIM

  • lack of capacity
  • fraud
  • duress
  • mistake
  • exceeding the scope
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What are the four things that you have to consider for both self defense and defense of others?

A
  • was there a reasonable belief?
  • imminence
  • unprivileged attack
  • reasonable force
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What are the two major things you need to think about for defense of property?

A
  • reasonable non-deadly force

- in order to recover personal property you must make a demand for its return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What are the three major areas of the defense of authority?

A
  • privilege to arrest
  • shopkeepers’ privilege
  • maintain discipline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What are the two different types of necessity?

A

Private and public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What are the four major categories of defenses to intentional torts?

A
  • consent
  • self defense/defense of others/defense of property
  • authority
  • necessity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What are the two major things that have to be discussed for private necessity?

A
  • injured property of another

- avoidance of substantially greater harm to own property or self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What are the two things that have to be considered for public necessity?

A
  • injury of the property of another

- avoidance of substantially greater harm to public

50
Q

After your discuss intentional torts and the defenses, in the checklist, what is the next category?

A

Negligence

51
Q

If you hire an independent contractor, are you vicariously liable for their negligence?

A

Usually no

52
Q

If a landowner holds open his land to the public, he has a non-delegable duty to do what?

A

Keep the premises safe for business visitors

53
Q

If you own a mall, and a guest is injured on your escalator, that was just fixed by an independent contractor, who is liable for the negligence?

A

The owner, because he has a nondelegable duty to keep the premises safe, even though the negligence was from the independent contractor

54
Q

What is the usual remedy for public nuisance?

A

Damages

55
Q

What is the only time that injunctive relief is given for public nuisance?

A

When damages are unavailable or an inadequate remedy

56
Q

If you are a police officer, and you’re driving back from the scene of an accident, does the firefighters rule apply to you if you were hit in that circumstance?

A

No, because being struck by a car in normal traffic is not a special risk inherent to dangerous police work, and the firefighters rule only bars claims for injuries that come from risks that are unique or special to the plaintiff’s inherently dangerous work

57
Q

A defendant’s duty to a known child trespasser is also referred to as what?

A

Attractive nuisance doctrine

58
Q

If you have a trampoline on your land, the attractive nuisance doctrine applies if you knew or should’ve known what four things?

A
  • Children come to your property when you are not home
  • Kids play on the trampoline
  • Using the tramp would likely cause injury because kids wouldn’t realize the danger of using it without mats
  • The expense of remedying the situation was slight compared to the probability of injury
59
Q

Must a child be lured onto the premises in order for attractive nuisance doctrine to apply?

A

No, that was the old rule

60
Q

Can you recover under a negligence action for pure economic loss to a plaintiff as a result of an injury suffered by a third-party?

A

No, with the exception of a wrongful death claim allowed by statute

61
Q

Can assumption of the risk be an affirmative defense to strict liability?

A

Yes, like when a state employee willingly takes on auditing duties in a potentially dangerous explosives factory

62
Q

At common law, parents are not vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of their children, but they can be liable for their what?

A

Own negligence in allowing or encouraging the child to act in a dangerous way, or knowing of a child’s tendency to injure others and not using due care to control that tendency

63
Q

If parents encourage their child to be aggressive and tough and they know their child has a reputation for being a bully, can they be liable for their child’s actions in injuring another child?

A

Yes, because they did not exercise due care

64
Q

What is considered a substantial interference for nuisance?

A

Something that would be offensive, inconvenient, or annoying to an average person of the same community

65
Q

What are the duties that a supermarket owes?

A
  • take reasonable steps to make conditions on the premises reasonably safe (inside and out)
  • use reasonable care for activities
  • use reasonable care to protect customers against foreseeable criminal acts of third persons/animals
66
Q

If a supermarket has actual knowledge of violent crimes on the premises, and they fail to take reasonable steps to protect customers, what happens?

A

they are liable

67
Q

If a product doesn’t have an adequate warning, what is that treated as?

A

Design defect

68
Q

If an injury would have occurred even with a legally sufficient warning, can someone that is injured recover?

A

No

69
Q

Can you recover for emotional damages as the consequence of a tort?

A

Yes, they can be tacked on as parasitic damages caused by another tort so long as the plaintiff suffered physical injuries

70
Q

If an underlying tort only causes property loss, can you recover for emotional distress also?

A

No, there has to be physical injury

71
Q

If a doctor failed to observe the medical standard, and no injury resulted, is that medical malpractice?

A

No, you can only have malpractice is an injury resulted

72
Q

What things have to be proved for medical malpractice?

A
  • proof that a medical standard was breached

- chain of causation to the injury

73
Q

Is legal causation superseded by a doctor’s decision to end artificial life support?

A

No

74
Q

If you negligently park in a crosswalk, what is your responsibility?

A

You bear the responsibility for harm caused to negligent jaywalkers because pedestrians were forced to walk outside of the crosswalk and that is a foreseeable consequence of what you did

75
Q

Someone is negligently parked across the crosswalk, and you have to jaywalk because you can’t use the crosswalk, is that an assumption of the risk?

A

No

76
Q

Can bad babysitting ever be a source of strict liability?

A

No, only negligence

77
Q

If you are going to a bowling alley to bowl, and you drop your kid off in childcare, what category do you belong in and what is the duty owed to you?

A

You are a business invitee and owed a duty of ordinary care, your child is a business invitee because he is accompanied by you

78
Q

Recovery for negligent misrepresentation is usually limited to what?

A

Pecuniary loss, unless it involves a risk of physical harm

79
Q

If you’re fired from your job because of someone’s negligent misrepresentation, and you immediately get a better position, what can you recover for your emotional harm?

A

Nothing, because you didn’t suffer any actual harm from the misrepresentation other than your emotional distress

80
Q

Are independent contractors liable for their own torts?

A

Yes

81
Q

What is an exception for an independent contractor being liable for his own tort?

A

If he is carrying out an inherently dangerous activity on the employer’s property that causes an injury or trespass. Ie: blasting

82
Q

If you contact an independent contractor to build a swimming pool, and he must use explosives in the job, and he hurts someone with those explosives, who is liable?

A

You are, because you have a nondelegable duty to the plaintiff because the contractor’s use of explosives in a residential neighborhood is inherently dangerous

83
Q

Anytime negligence must be inferred, what is at issue?

A

Res Ipsa Loquitur

84
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitur establishes a prima facie case for negligence when what things occur?

A
  • D had exclusive control of the instrumentality

- Plaintiff proves he was not responsible for the injury

85
Q

If a landlord owns a building occupied by tenants and a pedestrian is hurt by a flowerpot falling from one of the tenant’s windows, what would the pedestrian have to prove against the landlord in order to recover?

A

That he did not have exclusive control of the flowerpot during the relevant time frame, so Res Ipsa Loquitur could not establish negligence

86
Q

Is a landlord responsible for conditions created by tenants in their apartments?

A

No

87
Q

If you are well known in the community, does that make you a public figure?

A

No, you’re still a private party because you’re not an elected official or a celebrity and you have not placed yourself in the forefront of a public controversy

88
Q

How do you determine if a matter is of public concern?

A

By looking at the content, form, and context of the publication

89
Q

If the company doesn’t know that their product is dangerous, can they be liable for failure to warn?

A

No, they’re only required to warn of dangers that were, or reasonably should have been known to them at the time the product was delivered

90
Q

In a nuisance situation, when would you balance the competing interests?

A

Only when injunctive relief from the nuisance is sought (not when damages are the only thing being asked for)

91
Q

If you lend your car to someone knowing that the brakes are defective, but fail to warn that person of it, and then remember and call their wife and warm them, but the brakes fail and your friend is hurt because the wife doesn’t warn him, who is liable?

A

The wife’s failure to warn is a foreseeable risk taken when you failed to warn your friend, and is dependent, so it doesn’t supersede your own liability

92
Q

When does a directed verdict allow judgment?

A

If the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, is enough for a reasonable person or a jury to not be able to disagree

93
Q

When is a directed verdict encountered?

A

At the close of the evidence and before the matter goes to a jury

94
Q

Some states require a land owner that borders cattle grazing lands to do what?

A

Erect a fence

95
Q

If you are in a state that has a fence-out statute, what is the only way you can be liable for your cattle’s damage?

A

If you intentionally drive your cattle on to someone else’s land

96
Q

If you drive a truck that has a defect, can you be strictly liable for it?

A

No, you are a user, not a manufacturer or seller of the truck

97
Q

If you are the driver of a meat truck where meat hangs and because of a defect in the design, the meat can swing and cause you to tip over, what is your liability?

A

If you know about this dangerous propensity and there is a reasonable means to increase the safety at a minimal cost, you’re liable for negligence

98
Q

If a fact pattern says that two friends are in the habit of playing practical jokes on one another, and the one put something in the other’s food that he knew would make him very sick, what has happened?

A

A battery, don’t be fooled by the red herring that they are friends and playing a joke

99
Q

When are waivers most easily justified?

A

When an activity poses inherent risks that are familiar to the participants and cannot be entirely illuminated without removing the pleasure from the activity

100
Q

What is the threshold requirement for a product liability claim?

A

The defect existed at the time the product left the defendant’s control

101
Q

If a reconditioned saw injures someone, can the original producing company be liable for it?

A

No, because the defect did not exist at the time the saw left that company’s control. The reconditioning was a substantial alteration of the product, which severed strict liability from the company

102
Q

What does a standalone claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress require?

A

A negligent act that:

  • resultS in a personally witnessed injury to a close family member
  • or if the plaintiff was in the zone of danger himself
103
Q

If a driver accidentally hits a child that ran out into the street, and the child’s mom watched the incident, can the driver be liable for NIED?

A

Probably not, because he was probably not negligent

104
Q

Is contributory negligence a defense to strict liability?

A

No, but if it is an ultrahazardous activity, it can be a defense if the plaintiff knew of the danger and his unreasonable conduct was the reason the activity caused injury because his conduct is deemed contributory negligence and treated as an assumption of the risk

105
Q

Can a landowner be liable for the act of an independent contractor?

A

Not usually, unless the contractor was:

  • negligently hired, or
  • engaging in an ultra dangerous activity on the land
106
Q

If the homeowner is aware of his contractor’s ultra hazardous activity, who is liable for damage that results?

A

The homeowner, because ultrahazardous activity gives rise to strict liability, and a homeowner has a nondelegable duty for ultrahazardous activity that takes place on his land

107
Q

Does respondeat superior apply to independent contractors?

A

No, because they are not employees

108
Q

Can a university be vicariously liable for the actions of its students?

A

No, there is no master/servant relationship between universities and their students unless the student was authorized by a professor to do something

109
Q

If a professor authorizes students in his class to do something, does vicarious liability apply?

A

Yes, the students become agents of the University

110
Q

If the word “must” is used, why should you be careful about that?

A

It is probably a trap

111
Q

Is expert testimony absolutely necessary to establish a professional standard of care?

A

No, it is not required when the standard and breach are common knowledge

112
Q

Can the owner of an animal be responsible for its damage when he escapes the owner’s property?

A

Yes

113
Q

If a construction company specializes in the construction of certain facilities, will they be liable for damages caused by defective design?

A

Yes, because they knew or should’ve known of the dangerous defect

114
Q

If you purchase a product that has a warning on the box, and you dispose of the box, and then your roommate uses the product, what has happened?

A

The product has substantially changed from the condition it was sold in

115
Q

If two people’s negligence caused one injury, and the facts do not indicate that either action alone would’ve caused the injury, who would be liable and what kind of liability would it be?

A

It would be joint and several liability and both people will be liable

116
Q

A claim for defamation must prove that there was what?

A
  • defamatory communication of fact about P
  • published to a third person that understood it
  • resulting in harm to P
117
Q

What is the only way that a qualified privilege to testify can be overcome?

A

If the person’s statement was made with knowledge that it was false or reckless disregard for its truth

118
Q

If you testify about something that you reasonably believe is true, and it turns out not to be, does your qualified privilege to testify get overcome?

A

No

119
Q

What does a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict require?

A

Finding by the judge that the verdict could not have been reached by a reasonable jury

120
Q

If it appears that possibly the defendant was not in exclusive control of an instrumentality, can Res Ipsa Loquitur be used?

A

No

Torts FYLSE (61 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions