PACER. Flashcards
Pacer
Police and Community Engagement Review (PACER 2.0) Committee. She is also a pas
Original pacer report in 2012 at how many recommendations
31 31 recommendations intended to address bias free delivery of police services. Recommendation number four was the creation of an advisory committee, comprise equally of service members from all areas of the organization and community members and partners agencies investing in improving relations between police in the cities black communities
The pacer committee dedicated hours of ensuring the appropriate and thorough implementation of all 31 recommendations at five and continue supervisor service on matters of fair and equitable deliver your policing
PACER 2.0
In 2020 the Toronto police service board approved 81 recommendations for police reform and report in titled police reform in Toronto: systemic racism, alternative community safety and crisis response models and building new confidence in public safety.
These recommendations establish a roadmap for comprehensive police reform in Toronto and include building new committee safety response models there is initiative to address systemic racism and concrete steps to improve trust with our communities
As a result of the boards 81 recommendations to framer reconvene the police and community engagement review pacer pacer 2.0
Specifically recommendation number 70 reads direct to chief of police to develop and execute a multi facetted know your rights campaign before the end of 2020 on the basis of consulting and collaboratingWith various stakeholders, including representatives from the board funded collective impact initiative, representatives of toronto’s black and indigenous communities, youth groups, and community-based organizations that serve vulnerable and marginalized populations
I know you’re right subcommittee of pace or 2.0 it was created with the mandate to inform the community what their legal rights are in the interactions with police.

A/Superintendent Stacy Clarke
Acting Superintendent Stacy Clarke is the Unit Commander of the Community Partnerships and Engagement Unit.
Stacy’s diverse policing career has included working in primary and community response units, intelligence, homicide, criminal investigative bureau and the Toronto Police College. She is known for implementing the Province’s Street Check Legislation and Co-chairing the Police and Community Engagement Review (PACER 2.0) Committee. She is also a past Service representative on the Board’s Anti-Racism Advisory Panel (ARAP).
Manager Ian Williams
Ian Williams is the Manager of Analytic
Pacer. A big party is the know your rights in this
This is the pacer 2.0
In 2012 the Chiefs internal organization review exam in all aspects of community engagement pacer committee submitted a report with 31 recommendations number four was the creation of an advisory committee comprised equally of service members from all areas of the organization and community members and partners agencies invested in improving relations between police and the cities black communities.
2020 pacer 2.0 was created and the board approved 81 recommendations
Entitled police reform in Toronto systemic racism alternative community safety plan and crisis response models and building new confidence in public safety.
As a result of the Boers 81 recommendations chief Ramer reconvene the police and community engagement review. PAC ER 2.0
Specifically recommendation number 70 reads “ Direct the chief of police to development and execute a multi facetted know your rights campaign before the end of 2020.
In collaboration with representatives from the board funded collective impact initiative, representatives of toronto‘s black and indigenous communities, youth groups, and community-based organizations that serve vulnerable and marginalized populations.
I know you’re right subcommittee of pacer 2.0 was created with the mandate to inform the community “what their legal rights are and their interactions with police”

Incorporate by standards intervention
.
In March 2012 police chief William Blair Directed I review over the field intelligence report. This review is the foundation of phase 2 of the pacer
.There is a significant difference between bias and racism. We’re buyers may be viewed as a human frailty, racism can be viewed as a human failure.
Please sing as a high-risk business there will always be a stress between each from Forssman or individuals legal rights. A balance between operation requirements in the public trust of accountability is where the legal risk arises
These risks ultimately need to be managed and mitigated Service is Legal Service Section was consulted extensively throughout this process direction was clear from the onset.
What is the purpose of interacting with the community
Why the officers gather information
How is it actively carried out.
The declaration of principles of the police services act make it clear police services are required to conduct their affairs in accordance with the law have a respect for the charter and the Ontario human rights code.
Practises a Procedures must be carried out in a respectful manner and free of bias or racism
Number 13. At the services recruiting and hiring process of strengthen to include an evaluation of all potential candidates for evidence of discriminatory handle a racist behavior, including an examination of related social media content.
.
Indicate that pays her speaks a lot to the topic of
Public perception of racial profiling
