Organizational Decision Making and Problem Solving Flashcards
Designing your selection system strategy
- selection strategies may be based off business strategies
- important to find the right person
Personnel selection
- the process of determining those applicants who are selected for hire versus those who are rejected
predictor cutoff (aka cutoff score)
- a score on a test that differentiates those who passed the test from those who failed
- score on the predictor that reflects the level of knowledge and ability that is needed to successfully perform a job
- often equated with the passing score on a test
- predictor-criterion correlation
- people above the cutscore are accepted for hire, people below the cutscore are rejected.
criteria and predictor (in selection decision making)
- criteria = job performance
- predictor = selection measure (interview, cognitive ability test, work sample, etc)
1991 civil rights act (on use of cutoff scores)
“it is unlawful to adjust the scores of, use different cutoff scores for, or otherwise alter the results of employment tests on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or natural origin.”
criterion cutoff
- a standard that separates successful from unsuccessful job performance
true positives
- individuals who were correctly selected for hire because they became successful employees (above both predictor and criterion cutoff)
true negatives
- individuals who were correctly rejected for employment as they would have been unsuccessful employees (below prediction (and criterion) cutoff and would have performed poorly if hired)
false negatives
- individuals who were incorrectly rejected for employment as they would have been successful employees (above criterion cutoff but below predictor cutoff)
false positive
- individuals who were incorrectly accepted for employment as they became unsuccessful employees (below criterion cutoff but about predictor cutoff)
banding
- grouping together individuals with similar scores on a predictor
- a method of interpreting test scores such that scores of different magnitude in a numeric range or band are regarded as being equivalents
- based on standard error measurement
- ex: grades as A, B, C, D, F
multiple hurdle (when multiple predictors)
- evaluating each predictor separately
- must succeed in current predictor before moving on
- pros: fewer people
- cons: takes longer, cant make up poor performance
composite of predictors (when multiple predictors)
- evaluating all or many predictors together at once
- may need to determine weight of each predictor
- pros: more people, more money/time
- cons: faster, can fake poor performance
multiple correlation
- combining several predictors and evaluating with the criterion
- can still use cutoff
selection ration (equation)
selection ration = # hired / # applied