Offender Profiling:Top Down Approach Flashcards

1
Q

What is offender profiling?

A
  • An investigative tool used by police
  • Aim to narrow down the list of suspects
  • Involves carefully scrutinizing the crime scene
  • Involves analysing evidence
  • Generates a hypothesis about the possible offender
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the American approach?

A

top down approach
- Originated in 1970s by FBI
- Behavioural science unit used interviews with 36 sexually motivated murderer including Ted Bundy and Charles Manson
- Concluded data could be categorised as organised and disorganised crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the American Approach consist of?

A

Each category has certain characteristics
- If data from a future crime scene matched those characteristics, we can predict other characteristics that might be likely
- used to find the offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Top Down mean?

A

You collect data about the crime and then decide which category it fits into

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the characteristics of organised offenders?

A
  • Show evidence of having planned the crime
  • Victim is deliberately targeted
  • Usually has a ‘type’ of victim
  • Offender maintains a high degree of control
  • Little evidence left behind
  • Above average IQ
  • In a skilled, professional job
  • Socially and sexually competent
  • Usually married
  • Sometimes have children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are disorganised offenders?

A
  • Little evidence of planning
  • Offences are spontaneous
  • Impulsive attack
  • Body usually still at scene
  • Offended has little control of the situation
  • Lower than average IQ
  • Unskilled job or unemployed
  • History of sexual dysfunction and failed relationships
  • Live close to where the crime took place
  • Often live alone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 key terms involved in constructing an FBI profile?

A

Data assimilation, crime scene classification, crime reconstruction and profile generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is data assimilation?

A

Review the evidence (crime scene photos etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is crime scene classification?

A

Organised/disorganised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is crime reconstruction?

A

Sequence of events and behaviour of victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is profile generation?

A

Hypothesis related to the likely offender, demographics, physical characteristics and behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are strengths of the top down approach?

A
  • Canter et al analysed 100 US murders committed by different serial killers
  • Can be adapted to other types of crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is Canter et Al’s analysis a strength?

A

> Smallest-space analysis was used
(identifies correlations across different
samples of behaviour)
Assessed the co-occurence of 39
aspects of serial killings
Included whether there was torture,
restraints, attempt to conceal body,
weapon used and cause of death
Revealed that there seems to be subset
of features of many serial killings that
matched FBI typology for organised
offenders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is adaptation a strength?

A

> Meketa top down profiling recently applied to
burglary
85% rise in solved cases in 3 US States
2 new categories have been added
Now organised/disorganised/interpersonal (usually
knows victim and steals items/opportunistic
(inexperienced young offender)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are limitations of top down approach?

A
  • evidence suggests that organised and disorganised types aren’t mutually exclusive
  • Developed using 36 murder interviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is evidence against organised/disorganised a limitation?

A

> lots of combinations occur at different
murder scenes
Godwin: it’s hard to classify killers as
one or the other
Killers have contrasting characteristics
Organised killers sometimes act
unorganized
Unorganized killers sometimes act
organised
Behaviours at a crime scene let us little
about how that offender acts in everyday
life

17
Q

Why is the use of murder interviews a limitation?

A

> 24 were classified as organised
12 were disorganised
25 of these were serial killers
11 were single/double murderers
Canter et al: argued that the same was poor
It wasn’t a random or large sample and didn’t include
different types of offenders
Each interview was not standardised
Not completely sound or scientific