occupiers Liability Act 1957 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

deciding who occupier is

A

wheat vs E lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

if nobody is in control of premise

A

bailey vs armes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

premise

A

1(3)(a) -person possess or controls a fixed or movable structure(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

occupier did actions an ordinary person could’ve done

A

revill vs newbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

occupier doesnt have to make premise completely, has to do what is reasonable

A

laverton vs kiapasha takeaway supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

premise must pose serious threat before foreseeability of damage can be found

A

dean v debell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

no liability for pure accidents or multiple causes of damage

A

cole v david

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what section is about children

A

s 2(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

occupier needs to take precautions for allurement that could lead to harm

A

glasgow v taylor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if allurement exists but damage is not foreseeable- there is no liability

A

jolley vs sutton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

tradesman must protect themselves from any risk

A

roles vs Nathan s(2 (3)(b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

contributory negligence

A

claimant is partly responsible for injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

consent

A

if successfully argued D will not be liable for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

warning notice

A

can be oral or written s2(4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

occupier may be required to erect barriers or warnings to keep visitors safe

A

Rae vs Marrs ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if danger is obvious and visitor appreciates it, no additional warning necessary

A

Staples vs West Dorset

17
Q

exclusion clauses

A

an occupier is able to restrict modify or exclude his duty by agreement

18
Q

child trespasser

A

keown vs coventy

19
Q

occupiers liability for independent contractors
3 requirements
-insurance check

A

BOTTOMLEY v Todmorden Cricket Club

20
Q

occupiers liability for independent contractors
3 requirements
-reasonable to give work to contractor

A

HASELINE vs DAW

21
Q

occupiers liability for independent contractors
3 requirements
-if the occupier is not an expert, an expert may be needed

A

WOODWARD vs Mayor of Hastings