negligence Flashcards
neighbourhood test
Donoghue vs Stevenson
3reasonably foreseeable
Kent vs Griffiths
3proximity
Hill vs Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
3fair,just and reasonable
capital and Counties PLC vs Hampshire CC
reasonable man test
blyth vs birmingham waterworks
higher standard of care-professionals
bolam vs friern
lower standard of care-children
mullins vs richard
inexperience doesn’t affect standard of care
nettleship vs weston
characteristics not taken into account
nettleship vs weston
size of risk
if there is no risk there is no breach
roe vs minster of health
reasonable person not expect to go large length to prevent small risk
miller vs jackson
risk may be small, potential harm may be great, reasonable person expected to take precaution
paris vs stepney BC
the benefit of taking risk
balance usefulnessness to society with level of risk
watt vs hertfordshire CC
practical precautions
d expected to prevent harm
Latimer vs AEC
special characteristics of claimant
drunkenness taken into account
Griffiths vs Brown