Neuroscience methods Flashcards
neuroscience techniques
- Serving for study of relationship between brain & beh
Ideal methods? - Spatial resolution: cellular level
- Temporal resolution: millisecond scale
- Whole brain studied simultaneously?
- Non-invasive
- No such method
- Match existing methods, all with certain limitations, to the research question
microscopic anatomy: Brodmann areas
- Brain segmented according to appearance in microscope (cytoarchitectonics)
- 6 layers correlating to function
- Combined with comparative neuroanatomy
- Appearance reflects type of cells e.g. inputs vs outputs
- Type of cell sometimes correlates with function
- Studies restricted to small num of brains
6 layers of Brodmann areas
- 1: closest to cortical surface
- Not equally wide
- Layer 5 wider than 4
- Layer 5: contains mostly cells sending signals from brain –> periphery (output levels)
- Layer 4: cells receiving input from periphery (output layer)
- Relatively wide output layers typical of brain areas e.g. primary moto
transcarnial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
- Stimulator placed above scalp, contains a coil of wire
- Brief pulse of high electrical current fed through the coil
- Result: magnetic field with flux lines perpendicular to plane of coil
- Magnetic field induces electrical field perpendicular to magnetic field
- Electric field leads to neuronal excitation within the brain (trans-cranial)
- non-invasive, painless, safe stimulation of human brain cortex
- effects depend on stimulation site
how to measure effects of TMS
- Spatial resolution? - TMS to neighbouring sites of neighbouring sites of motor homunculus activates diff lower arm muscles (thumb vs little finger twitches)
- Motor cortex stimulation
- occipital cortex stimulation
- somatosensory cortex stimulation
- auditory cortex stimulation
- frontal cortex stimulation
- effects measured as peripheral responses, as impaired/altered perception task performance, or as brain’s direct response
motor cortex stimulation
how to measure effects of TMS
- Activates corticospinal neurons trans-synaptically
- Example: TMS coil 5cm lateral from vertex > often contralateral thumb twitches (20ms post TMS)
- Small change in coil position would result in little finger twitches instead of thumb twitches
- Record motor Eps (surface EMG, target muscle relaxed) - relaxed target muscle: motor evoked potential start from 20ms post TMS
- Record silent period in contracted target muscles ~150ms after motor cortex stim’, cortical mechanisms
occipital cortex stimulation
how to measure TMS
- Excitatory effects: e.g. phosphenes; inhibitory effects: suppression of motion perception & letter identification
- Phosphenes: ppt reports perception of light in the absence of light input to the eye
- Inhibitory effects can occur as ppt-reported suppression of motion perception or as decreased performance in a latter identification task
somatosensory cortex stimulation
how to measure TMS
- May elicit tingling, block the detection of peripheral stim (tactile, pain)
- Detection of tactile or painful stim may decline
- Can modify somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)
auditory cortex stimulation
how to measure TMS
interpretation of results challenging: loud coil click
frontal cortex stimulation
how to measure TMS
- Effects on subject’s mood? Potential for therapeutic use?
- Ongoing studies about this
example application TMS
- Study crossmodal plasticity in the brain
- Braille
- Superior tactile perception (compared with sighted ppl)
- Underlying changes in the brain?
- Blind persons’ visual cortex is known to be activated during Braille reading - Example of crossmodal plasticity
- Functional sig of this activation? = research question for TMS studies - Unclear if this activation is functionally sig
chronometry as an example of TMS
- Single-pulse TMS for mental chronometry
- Early blind subjects
- Tactile stim in shape of Braille letters applied to tip of right middle finger (peripheral stim) in a grid that display wither meaningful or nonsense characters
- Real & nonsensical Braille stim presented via tactile stimulator
- 2 TMS conditions in separate blocks: TMS coil either placed over left somatosensory cortex, Over left occipital cortex
- Interval between tactile stim & TMS systematically varied
- Subjects’ task - Detect stim, Identify stim as real vs nonsensical
- DV: num of correctly detected/identified stim
- Conclusion: visual cortex contributes to tactile info processing in early blind subjects = crossmodal plasticity
virtual lesions as an example of TMS
- Repetitive TMS for temporary inhibition of brain areas, fully reversible: virtual lesion (for a few mins, ppts behave as if after a brain lesion)
- repetitive TMS can induce temporary inhibition of brain areas in a fully reversible way, meaning that lesions can arise
- During these few mins, a behavioural tasks can be carried out
- Errors during Braille reading, early blind vs sighted subjects
- Error rates depend on sight of virtual lesions
- Crossmodal plasticiaty in early blind subjects: occipital cortex supports Braille reading
- With certain TMS protocols virtual lesion can outlast TMS stimulation by several mins - During these mins a behavioural task can be carried out
TMS advantages
- Temporal resolution in ms range
- Virtual lesion in subject may be better defined than lesion in patient
- Short duration of experiment minimizes risk of plasticity
- Repeated studies in same subject
- Group studies with standardised experimental setup
- Study double dissociations: stimulate or temporarily disrupt diff cortical regions during 1 task, 1 region during diff tasks
TMS disadvantages
- Spatial under-sampling (only 1 area at a time) - Notice paired-pulse TMS with 2 diff coils, assessing the effect of a conditioning stim from coil 1 on the response to a later test stim from coil 2
- Only cortical areas accessible
- Auditory cortex areas accessible
- Auditory cortex stimulation problematic (muscles)
- Loud coil click, need “sham stimulation”
EEG
measuring electrical activity of the brain
- Neurons aligned perpendicular to cortical surface, dendrites closer to the surface & axons closer to the white matter
- Synchronous firing of large neuron populations can be recorded non-invasively - Electrodes placed on scalp - evenly spaced to cover whole scalp
- EEG generated by postsynaptic potentials
- Under the influence of postsynaptic potentials, cortical neurons create surface-negative electrical dipoles
non-invasive neurophysiology
EEG
- Occipital rhythm of ~10 cycles/second or 10Hz = alpha rhythm: typically blocked by opening the eyes = Berger effect
- Oscillatory waveform
- Rhythms (oscillations) that can be observed in “spontaneous” (“continuous”)
EEG rhythms
- beta
- alpha
- theta
- delta
beta rhythms
EEG
- most evident frontally
- dominant rhythms when subject is alert
- eyes open
alpha rhythms
EEG
- occipital maximum
- dominant when subject is relaxed with eyes closed
- blocked by opening the eyes or by onset of mental effort (Berger effect)
theta rhythms
EEG
- ‘slow’ activity
- rare in adults when awake but perfectly normal inn children and sleep
delta rhythms
EEG
dominant rhythm in infants and stages 3 and 4 of sleep
spontaneous EEG without experimentally controlled sensory stim & without task
Ongoing oscillations in multiple freq bands e.g. varying with sleep stage
EEG-based parameters for bio psych
- Event-related oscillations: stimulus- or task- related changes in EEG oscillations, in terms of freq/amplitude
- Event-related potentials: waveforms defined in terms of latency relative to an event such as a sensory stim
event-related EEG oscillations
- Example: lateralised occipito-parietal alpha (~10 Hz) oscillations during visual spatial attention
- Regionally specific change to ongoing alpha oscillations
- After cue for right (left) hemifield, suppression of alpha oscillations in left (right) occipito-parietal region of interest (ROI)
- A brain correlate of lateralised attention towards subsequent target
- Processed signal: momentary amplitude of EEG alpha oscillations as a function of time - Relative to cue = 0ms
ERP types
- exogenous
- endogenous
- mesogenous
exogenous ERPs
- automatic responses of the brain, controlled by physical props of the stim
- sensory evoked potentials (<100ms post stim)
- Elicited whenever modality-specific sensory pathway (auditory, somatosensory…) is intact
- Influenced by intensity/freq of stim
- Highly important for neurological diagnosis, less so for psych research
endogenous ERPs
- reflect interaction between subject & event (attention, task-relevance, expectation)
- Response to omitted stim
mesogenous ERPs
- semi-automatic but modulated by cog processes
- effect of attention: subject responses to standard tones in attended ear
- effect of selective attention emerges as early as 100ms after
- mismatch negativity (MMN) passive auditory oddball paradigm
- subject not attending to auditory stim but reading a book the more discriminable the stim, the shorter the MMN latency and the larger the MMN amplitude frontal/central maximum MMN may reflect
- preattentive processing of deviant features
source localisation for ERPs
- ‘determine neural generator(s) whose activity results in scalp-recorded potential’ = inverse problem: no unique solution
- further difficulty: scalp distorts and ‘smears’ electrical fields
2nd bullet point: can be overcome by recording magnetic instead of electric fields as skull is transparent to the former: MEG
applications of MMN
- MMN in patients with SZ
- MMN in children with dyslexia
MMN in patients with SZ
- Decrease in MMN amplitude (compared with healthy control group)
- Attenuation stronger for duration deviants than for freq deviants
- Attenuated MMN also in first-degree relatives of SZ patients who are at increased risk for SZ, reflecting genetic vulnerability
MMN in children with dyslexia
- Reduction in amplitude (freq-deviant MMN)
- Reduction correlated with the severity of dyslexia
P300/P3
+ve deflection with ~300ms latency which can be observed under several conditions
endogenous ERPs, P300
- classic P3, P3b
- novelty P3, P3a
- omitted stim P3
- endogenous ERPs elicited by infrequently occuring targets, equally infrequent novel, environmental sounds
- during an actively attended novelty oddball task
- diff topographic distributions
- surface potential maps
classic P3, P3b
endogenous ERPs
- Response to task-relevant oddball stim, parietal maximum
- Sensitive to stim probability
- May reflect categorisation of stim (longer latency when stim are difficult to categorise)
novelty P3, P3a
endogenous ERPs
- response to unexpected deviant stim, frontal max orienting to stim for which no mem template available
- Amplitude maximum over frontal electrodes
- Auditory oddball paradigm may elicit MMN & P3a