Module 8 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Imagery

A

Mental representation of something; mostly visual but can occur in any modality; lots of individual difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Symbolic representation

A

Something that stand for an object in the real world but does not look like it (ex: language); can be schematic or abstract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Imagery debate

A

Do we store knowledge as a symbolic or analogue code first? Most scientists agree we use both propositions and mental images equally as often

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paivio’s Dual Code Theory

A

Thoughts can be represented in symbolic code (words) and analogue code (pictures); some items are coded in both, some can only have analogue coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Functional-equivalence hypothesis (Kosslyn)

A

All images are represented as spatial representations (spatial aspects of an object are maintained in the image); images are functionally equivalent to their object. Argues basic unit of knowledge is images whenever possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Propositional theory (Pylyshyn)

A

Argues we store information as verbal propositions, and images are a biproduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Proposition

A

Smallest unit that can stand for an assertion and be verified; can be expressed in language or images; not tied to a modality; internal and mental (only the individual has direct access to them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mental rotation experiments

A

2D images of 3D objects, judge reaction time of determining if the object is the same or different. Found longest time for different, and time increased with amount of rotation of same. Same findings for real 3D objects, supports functional-equivalence theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Image scanning experiments

A

Present a map, memorize it, mentally travel from one spot to another, push button at location. Reaction time measured. Longer time for longer distances; same as real life; supports functional-equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Image scaling experiments

A

Imagined one large animal and one small animal. Asked about physical details. Reaction time to answer was slower for smaller animals, indicating mental zoom process. Similar to real life; supports functional-equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ambiguous figures experiment

A

Presented star of david symbol. Memorized it. Asked about shapes that exist in it. Failed recognizing parallelogram despite it being a part of the shape. Argued that we stored it as a label rather than an image, otherwise we’d be able to recognize that shape. Rejects functional-equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aspects of representational knowledge

A

Symbolic, amodal, decontextualized (when you think of something you access all knowledge about it every time), stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Embodied cognition

A

considering how our bodies act in the world; interaction between the body and the environment creates meaning; does not require representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aspects of embodied cognition

A

Simulation based, Modality-specific, Situated, Dynamic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Simulation based

A

Thought is a simulation of an action, not a representation of knowledge; when we access knowledge we are actually reliving past experiences sensationally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Modality-specific

A

The way we store knowledge depends on how we experienced it, and it’s representation will follow that (ex: taste knowledge activates taste areas of brain)

17
Q

Situated/Context dependent

A

The context of why you are thinking about an object will change how you bring it to mind. Ex: apple in orchard vs. apple in bakery

18
Q

Dynamic

A

The way we encode or access knowledge can change the knowledge itself. Direct consequence of situated aspect.

19
Q

Zwaan egg experiment

A

Read sentences about egg being in fridge or pan. Shown a whole egg (in a shell). Asked if image matched what was described, measured reaction time. Found longer for pan than for fridge. Supports embodied cognition (context will determine what kind of egg you bring to mind; situated)

20
Q

Situated Simulation Theory (Barsalou)

A

Body/sensorimotor have causal connection with intelligent behavior; cognition requires reactivation of sensorimotor experience; neural representation of concepts is not amodal or abstract; knowledge is flexible and goal driven

21
Q

Semantic knowledge representation

A

Old assumption: semantic memory was stored in the anterior temporal lobe (based on dementia patients)
New assumption: knowledge is stored across the brain (patients can lose knowledge of specific categories, none of which coincide with the ATL)

22
Q

Hauk et al experiment

A

Studied brain activity of people performing and thinking about actions, saw that same areas activated when thinking as performing. Supports distribution of knowledge
Issue: brain imaging studies changes of activity, and since ATL is always active it won’t show up

23
Q

Hub and Spoke model

A

Knowledge is stored in a singular hub with a surrounding set of spokes

24
Q

Hub

A

modality-independent concept center; stores static and abstract knowledge (like the ATL)

25
Q

Spoke

A

Modality specific areas involved in thought simulation; works alongside the hub

26
Q

Probic TMS experiment

A

Applies TMS to the inferior parietal lobe and ATL to temporarily deactivate knowledge of reaching and grasping. Showed ppl images of living and nonliving objects. Measured reaction time to name the objects. Found all knowledge was affected when applied to ATL, but only non-living was affected when applied to IPL. Found that IPL area only concern knowledge about high manipulability non-living objects. Supports hub and spoke theory and that IPL is a spoke.