Milgrams research into obedience Flashcards
What is Obedience?
It is a form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority, who has the power to punish when obedient behavior is not forthcoming.
What is Internal validity?
It is a measure of whether results obtained in a research study are solely affected by changes in the variable being manipulated (i.e. by the independent variable) in a cause-and-effect relationship.
What is External validity?
It is a measure of whether data gathered in a research study can be generalised to other situations outside of the research environment they were originally gathered in.
How do conformity and obedience differ?
Conformity is a change in behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people. (Asch & Zimbardo’s research)
Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority, who has the power to punish when orders are not carried out. (Milgram’s research)
What was the aim of Milgram’s study
It was to investigate whether ordinary people would obey an unjust order from an authority figure and inflict pain and injure an innocent person.
What was the sample/technique of Milgram’s study
Sample/Technique: Milgram’s sample consisted of 40 male American p’s recruited through a newspaper advert, the ad said he was looking for participants for study about memory. They were all volunteers and were paid $4.50 to take part (this was a reasonable amount of money in the 60’s)
What was the Type of experiment of Milgram’s study
Lab experiment
What were the variables of Milgram’s study
IV = the degree of authority,
DV = the participants willingness to obey instructions given by authority figure.
What were the ethics of Milgram’s study
Participants were told that they could leave the study at any time, this means that they were given the right to withdraw.
What was the procedure of Milgram’s study?
Participant, known as teacher, shows learner (fake participant) every time they got something wrong and are told by the experimenter, each time they shock they increase the voltage.
What were the results of Milgram’s study
All p’s went to at least 350 volts, 64% continued to full 450 volts!
Qualitative observations made reporting p’s showing signs of distress and tension (sweating, stuttering, trembling).
What were the Results of Milgram’s study?
Results: All p’s went to at least 350 volts, 64% continued to full 450 volts!
Qualitative observations made reporting p’s showing signs of distress and tension (sweating, stuttering, trembling).
Does Milgram’s study have internal validity?
Originally, Milgram’s study was criticised for lacking internal validity.
Orne and Holland (1968) propose that many of the p’s went to higher voltages because they did not believe the shocks to be real and they were not fooled by the experimenter set up. This means that Milgram may not have been testing what he intended to investigate.
Milgram argued that at least 70% of the p’s did believe that the shocks were real.
Does Milgram’s study have external validity? (example)
Aim: Charles K. Hofling (1966) created a more realistic study of obedience than Milgram’s by carrying out field studies on nurses who were unaware that they were involved in an experiment.
GRAVE for Milgram’s experiment
G: All male sample, cannot be generalised to females: beta bias and androcentrism, we do not know whether females would have behaved in the same way.
R: Research by Hofling et al (1996).
A: Can be applied to real-life settings such as hospitals, as shown by Hofling suggesting that there are power dynamics in everyday relationships that impact obedience levels.
V: Milgram’s research was a lab experiment so it is argued that it lacked ecological validity for not reflecting obedience in everyday life. But it has external validity as it can be applied to other settings outside of he lab setting, as seen in Hofling’s research.
E: Ethical guidelines were breached: protection from psychological harm and deception.