methods in attachment research Flashcards
what type of technique do researchers rely on when studying babies and small children?
the observational technique
what is a frame-by-frame analysis?
when observing babies and small children, researchers have to focus on the small details. for instance where is the baby looking at each point in time and facial expressions. researchers record the behaviour on a camera and make detailed observations of behaviours displayed on each frame.
what can frame-by-frame video analysis lead to?
lead to more reliable observations
what is a longitudinal study?
where researchers investigate the same participants at multiple time points.
what type of study is a longitudinal study?
it is known as an observational study however they don’t have to be observational. they may use the self-report technique.
longitudinal study strengths
- it allows researchers to have a deep insight into behaviour and how it changes over time
- it gives the researcher insights into how early experiences shape behaviour
- by studying behaviours at multiple time points researchers can see if results are reliable across time
longitudinal study weaknesses
- attrition —> when, across the study, the researcher loses some of their participants from the sample
when is a natural or quasi experiment used?
because attachment reserchers often study independent variables that would be unethical to manipulate, they often conduct quasi or natural experiments.
when is an animal study used?
because attachment researchers often study independent variables that would be unethical to manipulate, the alternative is to conduct animal studies.
animal studies strengths
- instead of just relying on natural or quasi experiments that have lots of extraneous variables, we can still directly test cause and effect
animal studies weakness - generalisability
- the results of animal studies may not generalise to humans because animals are very different to humans
animal studies weakness - ethical issues
- might not always be considered ethical as they might cause distress to the animal. if we argue the studies don’t cause distress to the animals then this implies animals are different to humans which limits the generalisability of the findings. on the other hand, many researchers argue the benefits outweigh the negative impacts and even if animals are quite different to humans, they have sufficiently similar behaviours and genes that make the results still valid
animal studies weakness response - ethical issues
- on the other hand, many researchers argue the benefits outweigh the negative impacts and even if animals are quite different to humans, they have sufficiently similar behaviours and genes that make the results still valid