memory video Flashcards
memory is important for brands
brand names
brand benefits
experience with the brand
brand names
Brand names→ if we remember a brand name, it will be considered for purchase
Ex: walking into wine store and you see many dif brands of wine, the brands you can remember will be the brands that you will consider
brand benefits
If we remember a brands benefits→ our attitude towards the brand will improve
experience with brand
If we remember good experiences with a brand
our attitude towards the brand will improve
we may recommend the brand to others
Memory is important for brands but the issue is that consumers have bad memory towards brands
Ex: if you think about super bowl commercials, brands will pay for the commercials and want to show their ads in the hope that people will remember the brand and brand benefits
The reality is that people can barely remember the ads
People dont remember ads that they see and even when they remember the ad but they dont remember then brand
Monster did a funny ad but people didnt remember the brand but rmebered the ad
Consumer memory is not good and even when they remember the ad, they dont remember the brand
memory failure
interference
confirmation
sleeper effect
interfence with Mastercard
Ex of mastercard vs visa
Mastercard has been the official sponsor of the fifa world cup since 1994
Mastercard was the sponsor for the final in 1994 so there were mastercard logos everywhere
Mastercatd hoped that their investment would pay off in terms of memory and in terms of liking so people would like mastercard more bc of association between fifa and mastercard
To test if the mastercard investment payed off, mastercard hired a market research company to measure day after recall→ took a random sample of people and asked them questions
The question was: which credit card company sponsored the final → the answer was that 56% said visa was the one who sposonored, only 42% was mastercard
Why would this happen? Why would they make this mistake
One reason: visa is a leading market share brand in credit cards, stronger link in our minds between the concept of credit card and visa, when we think of credit cards, the first brand that comes to mind is visa
interrfereance
Interference : interference of a stronger link in memory. Big issue for marketers
We see this in oter product categories like cameras: canon having a big market share. Kodak would sponsor the olympics but not anymore
solution for interference
SOLUTION for a smaller brand facing interference from a larger brand: create a new link in the consumers memory that the leading market share company doesnt have . mastercard could target mcgill alumni and sponsor mcgill activities → goal is to create a strong link between mcgill and mastercard (when they think of mcgill, should think of mastercard
Solution: CREATE AND OCCUPY A SPECIFIC NICHE^
confirmation
Confirmation bias
Our mind wants to follow that expectation
Research study done during the 2004 election in the us→ between bush and kerry
Looked at debates
Took a 5 min video clip of the debate, there were the same number of grammatical mistakes made by each candidate
Showed the clip to people who hadnt seen the debate, one hour later, people were asked to recall the number of grammatical mistakes made by each
What they found: people found more mistakes for bush even though he made the same as kerry
‘Explanation for this: confirmation bias, there was an expectation that bush uses sloppy language → influences our memory
Another example: go to a restaurant, have a bad meal but we recall bad service even if the service was actually good
slepper effect
We remember the message not the source
Ex: germex. Has the message fight germs with your bare hands
Over time, our mind is more likely to remember the message rather than who said it—> good news for marketers because when marketers create ads, they can be confident that as time goes by, consumers will remember the ad but forget the source . firms are not credible sources
Rumours spreading oin population and sleeper effect
Can explain why rumors spread in the population→ ex; what is obamas religion. 12-18% say that he is a muslim even though he isnt. Why does a rumour persist over time? People remember the rumour but forget who spread the rumour. It was fox that spread it and people only remembered the claim
confirmation bias plus sleeper effect
Can also talk about confirmation bias→ the people who think he is muslim are people that dont like obama anyways , will have negative attributes
neg avdterising and sleeper effect
Sleeper effec also explains why negative advertisement is likely to be effective → ex: political advertising. Steven harper launched a negative ad campaign towards the liberals. He then apologized. Sleep effect says that people dont the source or the apology but what will be remembered is the attack
repetition and sleeper effect
Rumours and neg advertising also work with repetition
Ex: conspiracy theory that 911 was planned by the cia . if the rumour is repeated, comes to mind quickly through the availability heuristic, it becomes true
Repetition is another reason why rumours gain strength over time
“ repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth”–> repetition increases believability