memory - catching the moment Flashcards
what is an episodic memory made of?
- Contextual information - time + location, what we were thinking
- Relations (associations) of details - people + time + location
- A one-shot memory
- Details about an event e.g., who was there
- When these details come to mind we often have a sense of “reliving the past” = recollection (Tulving, 1983)
episodic memory in the lab
- study phase - encoding new ‘events’
- test phase - retrieving these ‘events’
stages of memory
- Encoding
- Storage
- Retrieval
divided attention and memory
- Dividing attention during encoding markedly impairs memory
- i.e., if you do something else at the same time you will not learn much!
in the brain - the hippocampus
- fMRI scanning when attending to colour or location
- Attention boosted source memory for the attended feature
- Hippocampus activated more when people encoded the attended features
- Hippocampus essential for binding items with context to create memories
- Known from effects of amnesia (H.M.)
- Further suggests attention may modify input to hippocampus
attention and memory
· Attention is important for encoding new memories
· Attention may boost inputs to the hippocampus
· To learn as much as you can, avoid distractions like social media
· Pictures often easier to remember than words (picture superiority effect) · Mentally imageable words are also easier to remember · So are concrete words (words that refer to objects)
why? dual code theory
· Paivio’s (1971) dual code theory - an image plus a verbal code produces a richer memory trace
· But this theory only explains the picture superiority effect (and did not predict it)
Or? distinctiveness theory
- The Von Restorff (1933) (isolation) effect - a memory boost from processing difference in the context of similarity (Hunt 2013)
distinctiveness and picture superiority
- Ensor, Suprenant and Neath (2019) abolished the picture superiority effect by making the words more distinctive using colour and fonts
predictors of memorability
· Objects, colour, and complexity made data visualisations memorable
· Scientific figures did not do as well as infographics, Govt worst
· Borkin et al (2013)
· Varying contexts - distinctive images were memorable Bylinski et al (2015)
meaning in image memorability
- images are less memorable where their concepts share more features with other concepts
- images with people are memorable, but natural scenes arent
- atypical versions of objects are - more distinctive
- review by Rust and Mehrpour (2020)
in the brain and at uni
· Studied new facts within degree courses
· Related (existing schema) to previous year’s content
· Or unrelated (no schema) to previous year’s content
· Memory better for course-related (schema) information 24 hours later
· fMRI while encoding new facts
· Schema-related facts:
○ Activated the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) more
○ Activated the medial temporal lobe (MTL) less (includes hippocampus)
· Medial PFC schema-related activation predicted Y2 course performance
schemas + prediction = distinctiveness?
- prediction error/distinctiveness effect - unexpected objects also better remembered than neutral
- schema effect - expected objects better remembered than neutral objects
- might prediction account for other kinds of distinctiveness effects on memory too?
levels of processing
· The baker-Baker paradox
· Processing for meaning often helps memory encoding
· But idea of ‘depth’ doesn’t tell us why or when this semantic processing will help.
depth of processing in the brain
· Brain regions like ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (A: VLPFC) are activated by semantic bs phonological processing
· Also activated when words are successfully encoded into memory